Anatomy-based diagnostic criteria for complex body wall anomalies (CBWA).

Nieves Martín-Alguacil
Author Information
  1. Nieves Martín-Alguacil: Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise diagnosis and classification of CBWA cases can be challenging. BSA are considered when there is a body wall anomaly, skeletal abnormalities, and the umbilical cord is anomalous, absent or rudimentary, and LBWC when there is a body wall and structural limb anomalies with or without craniofacial abnormalities.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for body stalk anomalies, limb body wall complex, body stalk anomalies and amniotic band syndrome, and limb body wall complex and amniotic band syndrome. Sixty nine articles were selected and reviewed. This article systematically classifies the variants of CBWA in 218 cases, the study is based on the embryological and anatomical criteria established by Martín-Alguacil and Avedillo to study BSA in the pig.
RESULTS: Eight different BSA presentation were defined. One hundred and eighty nine cases were classified as BSA, from which five were Type I, nine Type II, 20 Type III, 57 Type IV, 11Type V, 24 Type VI, 11 Type VII, and 52 Type VIII. Twenty six cases presented cranial phenotype, 114 abdominal phenotype, 42 cranio/abdominal overlapping phenotype, and five without defined phenotype. In addition, 52 BSA cases presented some kind of spinal dysraphism (SPDYS) and were classified as BSA/SPDYS, most of these cases did not show structural limb anomalies, except for three cases and were classified as LBWC/SPDYS.
CONCLUSION: This morphology-based classification represents a useful tool for clinical diagnosis, it helps to quantify and to evaluate CBWA in a precise, objective manner.

Keywords

References

  1. J Korean Med Sci. 1991 Jun;6(2):177-81 [PMID: 1751021]
  2. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1996;30(1):165-70 [PMID: 9125325]
  3. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):QD04-5 [PMID: 26894130]
  4. Hum Pathol. 1990 Aug;21(8):875-6 [PMID: 2143746]
  5. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;48(4):446-50 [PMID: 20045776]
  6. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;21(4):322-8 [PMID: 12704737]
  7. J Reprod Med. 1998 Aug;43(8):659-64 [PMID: 9749415]
  8. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;17(2):157-9 [PMID: 11251927]
  9. Radiol Case Rep. 2016 Mar 15;11(2):116-20 [PMID: 27257465]
  10. J Med Genet. 1988 May;25(5):340-3 [PMID: 3290490]
  11. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004 Jan;60(1):77-80 [PMID: 27407587]
  12. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000 Jun;29(4):385-91 [PMID: 10844326]
  13. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Mar;7(3):543-4 [PMID: 23634417]
  14. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):342-4 [PMID: 12913346]
  15. Indian J Hum Genet. 2014 Apr;20(2):195-8 [PMID: 25400352]
  16. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:357285 [PMID: 25105039]
  17. Pediatr Pathol. 1993 Jul-Aug;13(4):505-17 [PMID: 8372034]
  18. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014 Oct;100(10):739-49 [PMID: 24975578]
  19. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;57(5):769-771 [PMID: 30342671]
  20. Pediatr Surg Int. 2001 Jul;17(5-6):486-90 [PMID: 11527200]
  21. Appl Clin Genet. 2010 Feb 04;3:7-15 [PMID: 23776348]
  22. AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e264-e276 [PMID: 30377551]
  23. Anat Histol Embryol. 2020 Jan;49(1):144-149 [PMID: 31513296]
  24. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003 May;19(3):223-5 [PMID: 12811483]
  25. Genet Couns. 2014;25(3):315-20 [PMID: 25365854]
  26. Cases J. 2008 Aug 12;1(1):86 [PMID: 18699998]
  27. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2015;34(4):257-70 [PMID: 26111189]
  28. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;39(3):142-146 [PMID: 28257587]
  29. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:3974139 [PMID: 27699204]
  30. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(7):737-8 [PMID: 20925627]
  31. Prenat Diagn. 2000 Sep;20(9):769-70 [PMID: 11015711]
  32. Hum Pathol. 1989 Nov;20(11):1071-7 [PMID: 2530150]
  33. Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Apr;31(4):289-92 [PMID: 23385378]
  34. Birth Defects Res. 2019 Mar 1;111(4):222-228 [PMID: 30589520]
  35. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;11:20 [PMID: 22514754]
  36. Indian Pediatr. 2003 Sep;40(9):891-4 [PMID: 14530552]
  37. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Jul;158A(7):1702-8 [PMID: 22653710]
  38. J Lab Physicians. 2013 Jan;5(1):65-7 [PMID: 24014975]
  39. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):e1227 [PMID: 32281290]
  40. Prenat Diagn. 2003 Jun;23(6):513-4 [PMID: 12813769]
  41. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Feb 15;42(4):470-9 [PMID: 1609831]
  42. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(3):354-6 [PMID: 24992795]
  43. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;20(1):79-81 [PMID: 12100424]
  44. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58(4):1453-1460 [PMID: 29556640]
  45. Am J Med Genet. 1997 Jul 11;71(1):97-105 [PMID: 9215777]
  46. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Sep;155A(9):2045-59 [PMID: 21815262]
  47. J Comp Pathol. 2020 Jan;174:99-103 [PMID: 31955810]
  48. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008 Apr-Jun;51(2):255-6 [PMID: 18603699]
  49. APSP J Case Rep. 2017 May 01;8(3):19 [PMID: 28540190]
  50. AJP Rep. 2015 Oct;5(2):e124-8 [PMID: 26495169]
  51. J Comp Pathol. 2020 Feb;175:69-74 [PMID: 32138845]
  52. Pathol Res Pract. 2000;196(11):783-90 [PMID: 11186176]
  53. Pediatr Int. 2004 Feb;46(1):85-7 [PMID: 15043672]
  54. Am J Med Genet. 1993 Nov 1;47(6):893-900 [PMID: 8279488]
  55. Pol J Pathol. 2019;70(1):33-41 [PMID: 31556549]
  56. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Sep;11(5):241-4 [PMID: 19643652]
  57. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;50(4):558-60 [PMID: 22212340]
  58. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;10(6):419-21 [PMID: 9476329]
  59. J Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Mar 31;9(3):12-9 [PMID: 25926929]
  60. Prenat Diagn. 2001 May;21(5):418-9 [PMID: 11360287]
  61. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 May;146(5):1019-24 [PMID: 2938458]
  62. Am J Med Genet. 1991 Oct 1;41(1):21-5 [PMID: 1719813]
  63. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:218626 [PMID: 23970900]
  64. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Dec;35(12):2736-2739 [PMID: 27872425]
  65. Genet Couns. 2007;18(1):105-12 [PMID: 17515306]
  66. Ultraschall Med. 2009 Dec;30(6):598-601 [PMID: 19998210]
  67. J Pediatr Genet. 2012 Dec;1(4):235-8 [PMID: 27625829]
  68. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015 Jan-Mar;25(1):67-70 [PMID: 25709170]
  69. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2007 May-Jun;26(3):135-51 [PMID: 17886024]
  70. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015 Oct-Dec;58(4):528-30 [PMID: 26549084]
  71. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993 Dec;43(3):317-21 [PMID: 7907044]
  72. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Apr;84(4):602-8 [PMID: 11460977]
  73. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015 Sep;3(5):424-32 [PMID: 26436108]

MeSH Term

Abdomen
Congenital Abnormalities
Embryonic Development
Humans
Phenotype
Skull

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0casesbodyTypeBSAwallanomaliesCBWAlimbphenotypeclassificationcomplexnineclassifieddiagnosisabnormalitiesLBWCstructuralwithoutstalkamnioticbandsyndromestudycriteriadefinedfive52presentedBACKGROUND:PrecisecanchallengingconsideredanomalyskeletalumbilicalcordanomalousabsentrudimentarycraniofacialMETHODS:PubMedsearchedSixtyarticlesselectedreviewedarticlesystematicallyclassifiesvariants218basedembryologicalanatomicalestablishedMartín-AlguacilAvedillopigRESULTS:EightdifferentpresentationOnehundredeightyII20III57IV11TypeV24VI11VIIVIIITwentysixcranial114abdominal42cranio/abdominaloverlappingadditionkindspinaldysraphismSPDYSBSA/SPDYSshowexceptthreeLBWC/SPDYSCONCLUSION:morphology-basedrepresentsusefultoolclinicalhelpsquantifyevaluatepreciseobjectivemannerAnatomy-baseddiagnosticABSdefinition

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)