Effect of resilience on infertile couples' quality of life: an actor-partner interdependence model approach.

Ju-Young Ha, Seon-Hwa Ban
Author Information
  1. Ju-Young Ha: College of Nursing, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
  2. Seon-Hwa Ban: College of Nursing, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea. elli2378@hanmail.net. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility is an emerging socioeconomic issue affecting an individual's life and the nation. However, only few studies have examined the influence of resilience on the quality of life (QoL) of spouses as actors and partners. Hence, this study aimed to analyze the influence of resilience, a positive factor that infertile couples may have, on QoL using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM).
METHODS: By the analyses of couples' data, we analyzed the effect of resilience on the QoL of infertile couples as actors and partners. This cross-sectional study included 150 infertile couples. The Fertility Quality of Life and Resilience Scale was used to measure couples' QoL and resilience. APIM was applied to analyze QoL.
RESULTS: In terms of actor effects, the resilience of both wives (β = 0.201, p <  0.001) and husbands (β = 0.713, p <  0.001) had a significant effect on individual QoL. With regard to partner effects, husbands' resilience (β = 0.351, p <  0.001) had a significant impact on wives' QoL and the wives' resilience (β = 0.219, p = 0.009) had a significant impact on husbands' QoL.
CONCLUSIONS: The resilience of an infertile actor was found to affect both his/her own QoL and his/her partner's QoL. In the future, if a program is to be developed to improve couples' QoL, both spouses should work together to improve their resilience, thereby improving their QoL.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 24;16(1):73 [PMID: 29690877]
  2. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Apr;21(2):293-308 [PMID: 17241818]
  3. Hum Reprod. 1997 Jan;12(1):183-90 [PMID: 9043926]
  4. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):38 [PMID: 30770738]
  5. J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78 [PMID: 7850498]
  6. J Menopausal Med. 2019 Apr;25(1):35-40 [PMID: 31080787]
  7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Nov;28(11):1111-7 [PMID: 21901362]
  8. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;31(2):101-10 [PMID: 20443659]
  9. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018 Sep;21(3):195-203 [PMID: 28521566]
  10. J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(5):588-601 [PMID: 27802115]
  11. Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2151-7 [PMID: 19451130]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91 [PMID: 21665875]
  13. J Holist Nurs. 2018 Mar;36(1):6-14 [PMID: 29436974]
  14. Contemp Nurse. 2011 Dec;40(1):130-40 [PMID: 22545911]
  15. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Jun;43(3):312-20 [PMID: 23893221]
  16. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1656-64 [PMID: 19287047]
  17. Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):361-8 [PMID: 19485613]

MeSH Term

Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Infertility
Male
Quality of Life
Resilience, Psychological
Spouses

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0QoLresilienceinfertilecouples'β = 0lifecouplesinterdependencemodelp <  0001significantInfertilityinfluencequalityspousesactorspartnersstudyanalyzeactor-partnerAPIMeffectQualityResilienceactoreffectshusbands'impactwives'his/herimproveBACKGROUND:emergingsocioeconomicissueaffectingindividual'snationHoweverstudiesexaminedHenceaimedpositivefactormayusingMETHODS:analysesdataanalyzedcross-sectionalincluded150FertilityLifeScaleusedmeasureappliedRESULTS:termswives201husbands713individualregardpartner351219p = 0009CONCLUSIONS:foundaffectpartner'sfutureprogramdevelopedworktogethertherebyimprovingEffectlife:approachActor–partner

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)