Intramuscular stimulation vs sham needling for the treatment of chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Lyndal Solomons, Jenny J Y Lee, Margaret Bruce, Lynita D White, Alex Scott
Author Information
  1. Lyndal Solomons: Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  2. Jenny J Y Lee: Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
  3. Margaret Bruce: Kinetic Rehabilitation Centre, North Vancouver, Canada.
  4. Lynita D White: Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  5. Alex Scott: Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The insertion of filiform needles intramuscularly (a.k.a. intramuscular stimulation/dry needling) has been suggested as a possible treatment for various painful musculoskeletal conditions. Our aim was to answer the question, is intramuscular stimulation more effective than sham intramuscular stimulation/dry needling for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy?
METHODS: 52 participants with persistent midportion Achilles tendinopathy began and 46 completed one of three treatment protocols which were randomly assigned: (G3) a 12-week rehabilitation program of progressive tendon loading plus intramuscular stimulation (n = 25), (G2) the same rehabilitation program but with sham intramuscular stimulation (n = 19), or (G1) a reference group of rehabilitation program alone (as an additional control) (n = 8). The a priori primary outcome measure was change in VISA-A score at 12 weeks-VISA-A was also measured at 6 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include the proportion of patients who rated themselves as much or very much improved (%), dorsiflexion range of motion (degrees), and tendon thickness (mm).
RESULTS: The study retention was 94% at 12 weeks and 88% at 1 year. VISA-A score improved in all three groups over time (p<0.0001), with no significant difference among the three groups in VISA-A score at the start of the study (mean ± SD: G3 59 ± 13, G2 57 ± 17, G1 56 ± 22), at 12 weeks (G3 76 ± 14, G2 76 ± 15, G1 82 ± 11) or at any other timepoint. The percentage of patients who rated themselves as much or very much improved (i.e. treatment success) was not different after 12 weeks (G3 70%, G2 89%, G1 86% p = 0.94), or at 26 (p = 0.62) or 52 weeks (p = 0.71). No clinically significant effects of intervention group were observed in any of the secondary outcome measures.
CONCLUSION: The addition of intramuscular stimulation to standard rehabilitation for Achilles tendinopathy did not result in any improvement over the expected clinical benefit achieved with exercise-based rehabilitation alone.

References

  1. JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):144-9 [PMID: 20068208]
  2. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Dec;14(6):945-956 [PMID: 31803527]
  3. Clin J Sport Med. 2005 May;15(3):133-5 [PMID: 15867554]
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Nov;99(5):1977-84 [PMID: 16037403]
  5. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1990-7 [PMID: 27257167]
  6. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;47(9):536-44 [PMID: 23584762]
  7. Chin J Integr Med. 2013 Dec;19(12):900-4 [PMID: 23263998]
  8. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Aug;29(8):1223-1231 [PMID: 31044450]
  9. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Apr;13(2):283-292 [PMID: 30090686]
  10. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;39(3):607-13 [PMID: 21084657]
  11. J Res Med Sci. 2018 Apr 26;23:37 [PMID: 29887905]
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):627-630 [PMID: 31519545]
  13. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jul;64(7):1083-6 [PMID: 15958764]
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1160-3 [PMID: 18359821]
  15. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(16):1004-7 [PMID: 26701922]
  16. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2014 Aug;7(4):186-9 [PMID: 25151451]
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):944-63 [PMID: 15834340]
  18. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 May;48(5):A1-A38 [PMID: 29712543]
  19. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):249-56 [PMID: 18484252]
  20. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):94-101 [PMID: 15163110]
  21. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):298-305 [PMID: 24725800]
  22. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 26;(5):CD010960 [PMID: 26009861]
  23. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;83(5):368-74, quiz 375-7, 389 [PMID: 15100626]
  24. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;53(21):1352-1361 [PMID: 30718234]
  25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Nov;440:199-204 [PMID: 16239807]
  26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1817-1838 [PMID: 26971111]
  27. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jul;26(7):2038-2044 [PMID: 28856388]
  28. BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e015126 [PMID: 28473518]
  29. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Dec;63(6):631-4 [PMID: 1471511]
  30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 May;13(4):338-44 [PMID: 15688235]
  31. FASEB J. 2020 Jan;34(1):776-788 [PMID: 31914656]
  32. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;46(6):409-29 [PMID: 27117725]
  33. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87 [PMID: 22666642]
  34. J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Nov 19;18(4):780-788 [PMID: 31827363]
  35. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(5):284-291 [PMID: 28698221]
  36. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Apr 24;5(1):e000528 [PMID: 31191975]
  37. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jul;92(7):1098-105 [PMID: 21529778]
  38. J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Dec 01;9(4):587-96 [PMID: 24149785]
  39. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):916-22 [PMID: 15118032]
  40. Sports Med. 2018 Aug;48(8):1875-1891 [PMID: 29766442]

MeSH Term

Achilles Tendon
Adult
Chronic Disease
Exercise Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Therapy Modalities
Range of Motion, Articular
Tendinopathy
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0±intramuscular=treatmentstimulationrehabilitation12weeksAchillesG3G2G1muchneedlingshamthreeprogramnoutcomeVISA-Ascoreimprovedp0astimulation/dry52midportiontendinopathytendongroupalone6measurespatientsratedstudygroupssignificant76clinicalBACKGROUND:insertionfiliformneedlesintramuscularlyksuggestedpossiblevariouspainfulmusculoskeletalconditionsaimanswerquestioneffectivetendinopathy?METHODS:participantspersistentbegan46completedoneprotocolsrandomlyassigned:12-weekprogressiveloadingplus2519referenceadditionalcontrol8prioriprimarymeasurechangeweeks-VISA-AalsomeasuredmonthsSecondaryincludeproportion%dorsiflexionrangemotiondegreesthicknessmmRESULTS:retention94%88%1yeartimep<00001differenceamongstartmeanSD:59135717562214158211timepointpercentageiesuccessdifferent70%89%86%94266271clinicallyeffectsinterventionobservedsecondaryCONCLUSION:additionstandardresultimprovementexpectedbenefitachievedexercise-basedIntramuscularvschronictendinopathy:randomizedcontrolledtrial

Similar Articles

Cited By