Affective disorders: A question of continuing treatment during pregnancy (Review).

Simona Corina Trifu, Alexandra Popescu, Maria Alina Marian
Author Information
  1. Simona Corina Trifu: Department of Neurosciences, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
  2. Alexandra Popescu: Department of Psychiatry, 'Alex. Obregia̓ Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry, 041914 Bucharest, Romania.
  3. Maria Alina Marian: Department of Psychiatry, 'Alex. Obregia̓ Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry, 041914 Bucharest, Romania.

Abstract

Fetal development, especially in the first trimester, has proven to be heavily influenced by external factors, such as chemical intake of medication. Chronic psychiatric treatment might interfere with the anatomical and physiological wellbeing of the fetus, because psychotropic medication proceeds past the placenta, into the amniotic fluid, and can enter breast milk. Hence some of the medications prescribed for mood disorders should be reconsidered during pregnancy, without sub-optimally treating when it is needed. A literature review is presented which systematically collects modern data and synthesizes previous interdisciplinary research findings on the safety of psychiatric treatment for affective disorders during pregnancy (term-based) and lactation. Antidepressants and mood stabilizers, fundamental strategies in treating affective disorders, have been classified by the FDA as C respectively D drugs pertaining to their risk, with some exception. Most guidelines recommend pharmacologically treating moderate-severe depression, preferably with SSRIs. Evidence advocates that drugs should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed and the benefit outweighs the risk to the fetus. However, guidelines the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists state that antidepressants are a preferred first course of treatment and does not take into account the severity of the depression. Among mood-stabilizers, lithium is considered to be the safest option for pregnant women. Anticonvulsants have a higher risk of teratogenicity compared with lithium, with lamotrigine being the safest one. All mood stabilizers should be recommended in the lowest effective doses. There is controversy regarding the safety of second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy and further research is required. Several case reports and meta-reviews have been published in order to emphasize the safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) during pregnancy, but practitioners still stigmatize this procedure. Evaluating the overall risk-benefit ratio should be assessed by the medical care provider, taking into consideration current findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Feb;160(2):173-6 [PMID: 16461873]
  2. Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Dec;16(4):609-16 [PMID: 19892603]
  3. BMJ. 2020 Feb 19;368:m237 [PMID: 32075794]
  4. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Feb;38(1):89-91 [PMID: 29194089]
  5. Clujul Med. 2015;88(3):381-5 [PMID: 26609273]
  6. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Apr;22(4):385-9 [PMID: 23046044]
  7. J Psychiatr Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):2-6 [PMID: 30633726]
  8. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;21(2):264-268 [PMID: 27931774]
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):932-6 [PMID: 15746694]
  10. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Aug;19(4):581-90 [PMID: 26940835]
  11. CNS Spectr. 2014 Aug;19(4):305-15 [PMID: 24571806]
  12. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2019 Jul-Sep;15(3):410-415 [PMID: 32010366]
  13. J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:593-596 [PMID: 29957476]
  14. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0165122 [PMID: 27906972]
  15. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;175(6):564-574 [PMID: 29730938]
  16. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 15;349:8-20 [PMID: 29679653]
  17. CNS Drugs. 2017 Jun;31(6):439-450 [PMID: 28434134]
  18. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;74(4):e293-308 [PMID: 23656855]
  19. Epilepsia. 2013 Mar;54(3):405-14 [PMID: 23360413]
  20. Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):918-926 [PMID: 17697910]
  21. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 1;173(2):117-27 [PMID: 26514657]
  22. Neurology. 1992 Apr;42(4 Suppl 5):83-8 [PMID: 1574183]
  23. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007 Apr;79(4):301-8 [PMID: 17216624]
  24. BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):1900-1907 [PMID: 27239775]
  25. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2016 Mar-Apr;54:5-14 [PMID: 26791321]
  26. Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1716-25 [PMID: 27053714]
  27. Brain Behav. 2019 Jul;9(7):e01315 [PMID: 31104352]
  28. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):1017-25 [PMID: 24692316]
  29. BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 18;2(3): [PMID: 22710132]
  30. Acta Naturae. 2014 Jul;6(3):98-105 [PMID: 25349718]
  31. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;57(Suppl 2):S308-23 [PMID: 26330649]
  32. J Med Life. 2009 Apr-Jun;2(2):155-64 [PMID: 20108534]
  33. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Dec;21(6):715-722 [PMID: 29796968]
  34. Daru. 2012 Nov 01;20(1):75 [PMID: 23351929]
  35. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan;84(1):189-194 [PMID: 29044597]
  36. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 May;16(5):474-84 [PMID: 16897811]
  37. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;9(12):1533-1546 [PMID: 27825017]
  38. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2019 Jul-Sep;15(3):404-405 [PMID: 32010363]
  39. Can J Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;48(2):106-10 [PMID: 12655908]
  40. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Feb;62(2):865-70 [PMID: 21964434]
  41. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;175(12):1225-1231 [PMID: 30111186]
  42. Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Jul;37(7):e71-e75 [PMID: 28543284]
  43. Neurology. 2015 Jan 27;84(4):382-90 [PMID: 25540307]
  44. J Neurol. 2014 Mar;261(3):579-88 [PMID: 24449062]
  45. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013 Aug 01;14:38 [PMID: 23902726]
  46. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Feb;18(2):13 [PMID: 26781551]
  47. CNS Drugs. 2018 Apr;32(4):351-366 [PMID: 29637530]
  48. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015 Apr;18(2):139-146 [PMID: 25589155]
  49. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;22(1):2-5 [PMID: 28657488]
  50. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;67(10):1012-24 [PMID: 20921117]
  51. J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 01;212:1-6 [PMID: 28129551]
  52. Life Sci. 2007 Nov 10;81(21-22):1501-8 [PMID: 17977561]
  53. Neurology. 2002 Jul 23;59(2):251-5 [PMID: 12136066]
  54. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 May;11(3):425-37 [PMID: 22400907]
  55. J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:82-89 [PMID: 31846905]
  56. BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 1;9(9):e025908 [PMID: 31575566]
  57. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;67(8):1280-4 [PMID: 16965209]
  58. JAMA. 1994 Jan 12;271(2):146-50 [PMID: 8031346]
  59. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Feb;49:82-9 [PMID: 25498856]
  60. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;34(2):244-55 [PMID: 24525634]
  61. Birth Defects Res. 2017 Sep 1;109(15):1196-1203 [PMID: 28657171]
  62. Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):131-48 [PMID: 20331658]
  63. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;193(6):2004-9 [PMID: 16325604]
  64. J ECT. 2016 Dec;32(4):230-235 [PMID: 27327556]
  65. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Mar;88(3):159-70 [PMID: 19739149]
  66. Eur J Pediatr. 1990 Dec;150(2):136-8 [PMID: 2279511]
  67. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;13(2):207-25 [PMID: 24383525]
  68. Riv Psichiatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;50(1):8-11 [PMID: 25805349]
  69. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):609-17 [PMID: 21652013]
  70. Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Sep;29(Suppl 3):679-684 [PMID: 28953852]
  71. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;51(11):1087-1097 [PMID: 28825316]
  72. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):111-20 [PMID: 21646927]
  73. BMC Med. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):6 [PMID: 29332605]
  74. Early Hum Dev. 2012 Jun;88(6):375-8 [PMID: 22000820]
  75. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011 May;12(5):781-8 [PMID: 21342118]
  76. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;175(12):1161-1162 [PMID: 30501412]
  77. Curr Drug Saf. 2010 Apr;5(2):153-70 [PMID: 19534639]
  78. Adv Bioinformatics. 2012;2012:352729 [PMID: 22693500]
  79. Neurology. 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1565-70 [PMID: 23553472]
  80. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):52 [PMID: 31462311]
  81. J ECT. 2020 Jun;36(2):e14-e15 [PMID: 31913929]
  82. Epilepsy Res. 2014 May;108(4):717-24 [PMID: 24598456]
  83. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e017248 [PMID: 28729328]
  84. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Dec;98:211-221 [PMID: 30033161]
  85. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1179-98 [PMID: 17978143]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pregnancytreatmentmooddisorderstreatingsafetystabilizersriskfirstmedicationpsychiatricfetusneededresearchfindingsaffectivedrugsguidelinesdepressionantidepressantslithiumsafestelectroconvulsivetherapyFetaldevelopmentespeciallytrimesterprovenheavilyinfluencedexternalfactorschemicalintakeChronicmightinterfereanatomicalphysiologicalwellbeingpsychotropicproceedspastplacentaamnioticfluidcanenterbreastmilkHencemedicationsprescribedreconsideredwithoutsub-optimallyliteraturereviewpresentedsystematicallycollectsmoderndatasynthesizespreviousinterdisciplinaryterm-basedlactationAntidepressantsfundamentalstrategiesclassifiedFDACrespectivelyDpertainingexceptionrecommendpharmacologicallymoderate-severepreferablySSRIsEvidenceadvocatesusedclearlybenefitoutweighsHoweverAmericanCollegeObstetriciansGynecologistsstatepreferredcoursetakeaccountseverityAmongmood-stabilizersconsideredoptionpregnantwomenAnticonvulsantshigherteratogenicitycomparedlamotrigineonerecommendedlowesteffectivedosescontroversyregardingsecond-generationantipsychoticsrequiredSeveralcasereportsmeta-reviewspublishedorderemphasizeECTpractitionersstillstigmatizeprocedureEvaluatingoverallrisk-benefitratioassessedmedicalcareprovidertakingconsiderationcurrentAffectivedisorders:questioncontinuingReviewneonataltoxicityneurodevelopmentperinatalpsychiatryteratogenesis

Similar Articles

Cited By