Improvement of Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in sputum using DNA extracted by sonication.

Graziele Lima Bello, Franciele Costa Leite Morais, Jonas Michel Wolf, Mirela Gehlen, Tainá Dos Santos Soares, Maria Laura Halon, Regina Bones Barcellos, Maria Lucia Rosa Rossetti
Author Information
  1. Graziele Lima Bello: Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada à Saúde, Canoas, RS, Brasil.
  2. Franciele Costa Leite Morais: Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada à Saúde, Canoas, RS, Brasil.
  3. Jonas Michel Wolf: Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada à Saúde, Canoas, RS, Brasil.
  4. Mirela Gehlen: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pneumologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  5. Tainá Dos Santos Soares: Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Curso de Biomedicina, Canoas, RS, Brasil. Electronic address: taina.soares@rede.ulbra.br.
  6. Maria Laura Halon: Secretaria do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (SES/ RS), Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CDCT), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  7. Regina Bones Barcellos: Secretaria do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (SES/ RS), Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CDCT), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
  8. Maria Lucia Rosa Rossetti: Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular Aplicada à Saúde, Canoas, RS, Brasil; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. Electronic address: maria.rossetti@ulbra.br.

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the infectious diseases with high mortality in the world. DNA amplification techniques have been used to overcome barriers to the diagnosis of this disease. However, the success of these methodologies is highly dependent on the DNA obtained from the sample. This study was carried out to verify whether the DNA extracted by sonication (in house method) could yield suitable DNA for amplification by real-time PCR (qPCR). Sixty sputum samples were submitted to DNA extraction using sonication compared to a commercial method (Detect-TB kit, Labtest/MG-Brazil). All DNA samples were amplified by qPCR for IS6110 region (IS6110-qPCR/SYBR Green assay). Out of 60 samples, 40 were positive for TB; of these, all had positive results when extracted by sonication (100%) and 80% when extracted by the commercial method. The limit of detection (LOD) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Rv strain) by qPCR was 14 CFU/mL when the DNA was extracted by sonication, compared to countless colonies when extracted by commercial kit. In conclusion, the sonication protocol (without purification step) proved to be a simple, fast, and suitable method for obtaining DNA for use in qPCR from sputum samples.

Keywords

References

  1. J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Dec;131:144-147 [PMID: 27984057]
  2. Anal Biochem. 2016 May 15;501:44-6 [PMID: 26774955]
  3. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Sep;24:158-163 [PMID: 27448236]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Oct;39(10):3750-2 [PMID: 11574609]
  5. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017 Feb;112(2):94-99 [PMID: 28177043]
  6. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 27;16(1):517 [PMID: 27677540]
  7. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Dec 28;6:561 [PMID: 24373461]
  8. Bioresour Technol. 2015 May;184:276-279 [PMID: 25435064]
  9. Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;80S:S1-S5 [PMID: 30802624]
  10. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9306564 [PMID: 28785592]
  11. Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 28;5:12567 [PMID: 26215170]
  12. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 17;6:28063 [PMID: 27312200]
  13. J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Oct;141:10-16 [PMID: 28728909]
  14. J Microbiol Methods. 2004 May;57(2):241-9 [PMID: 15063064]
  15. J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Apr;123:51-61 [PMID: 26853124]
  16. Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jun;275:171-177 [PMID: 28391112]
  17. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2020 Mar;121:101915 [PMID: 32279871]
  18. Bioinformation. 2011;6(7):283-5 [PMID: 21738331]
  19. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0148023 [PMID: 26821228]
  20. mSystems. 2016 Oct 18;1(5): [PMID: 27822556]
  21. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jan 17;7:3 [PMID: 28144587]
  22. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 30;10(1):e0115960 [PMID: 25635817]
  23. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2015 Nov;80(11):1478-84 [PMID: 26615439]
  24. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May;43(5):2471-3 [PMID: 15872286]
  25. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(2):70-3 [PMID: 19242860]
  26. J Biomol Tech. 2005 Dec;16(4):316-7 [PMID: 16522851]
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):495-503 [PMID: 1691208]
  28. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23;7:45199 [PMID: 28332631]
  29. Zebrafish. 2017 Feb;14(1):35-41 [PMID: 27788059]
  30. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):629-30 [PMID: 7751368]
  31. Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Oct 09;45(3):841-3 [PMID: 25477916]
  32. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011 Mar;106(2):194-9 [PMID: 21537680]
  33. mBio. 2017 Aug 29;8(4): [PMID: 28851844]

MeSH Term

Brazil
DNA
DNA, Bacterial
Humans
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sonication
Sputum
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Chemicals

DNA, Bacterial
DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DNAextractedsonicationmethodqPCRsamplessputumcommercialTuberculosisTBamplificationsuitableextractionusingcomparedkitpositivedetectionMycobacteriumtuberculosisoneinfectiousdiseaseshighmortalityworldtechniquesusedovercomebarriersdiagnosisdiseaseHoweversuccessmethodologieshighlydependentobtainedsamplestudycarriedverifywhetherhouseyieldreal-timePCRSixtysubmittedDetect-TBLabtest/MG-BrazilamplifiedIS6110regionIS6110-qPCR/SYBRGreenassay6040results100%80%limitLODH37Rvstrain14 CFU/mLcountlesscoloniesconclusionprotocolwithoutpurificationstepprovedsimplefastobtaininguseImprovementSonicationSputum

Similar Articles

Cited By