Collaboration between community social services and healthcare institutions: The use of a collaborative individual plan.

Håkan Källmén, Anders Hed, Tobias H Elgán
Author Information
  1. Håkan Källmén: STAD, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.
  2. Anders Hed: STAD, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.
  3. Tobias H Elgán: STAD, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-functioning care of people with substance use and psychiatric disorders presumes collaboration between different parties such as psychiatric care and substance use treatment centres, as well as social services. According to Swedish law, a collaborative individual plan, i.e., a written action plan to support structured inter-organisational collaboration, should be established. However, there are indications that such action plans are not used to a satisfactory extent.
AIM: To explore current inter-organisational collaboration and use of collaborative individual plans among healthcare units and social services in Stockholm County.
DESIGN: The study uses a cross-sectional design. Participants ( = 797) in a course specifically aimed at improving the knowledge and use of collaborative individual plans were invited to take part in the study prior to attending the course. A total of 705 participants accepted. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire sent to each participant's workplace. Non-respondents were offered a paper version to fill out.
RESULTS: Respondents reported participating in one to two collaborative individual plans per month and about 70% reported using a particular template. Respondents perceived mainly positive consequences of establishing a collaborative individual plan, for instance that it clarifies what measures are to be performed and who is responsible.
CONCLUSIONS: Although respondents were generally positive about establishing a collaborative individual plan and the consequences thereof, they reported low use of such action plans.

Keywords

References

  1. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Mar;23(1):140-5 [PMID: 19250454]
  2. Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Mar;13(2):136-44 [PMID: 15717915]
  3. Health Soc Care Community. 2014 May;22(3):225-33 [PMID: 23750908]
  4. Health Soc Care Community. 2005 Nov;13(6):531-41 [PMID: 16218982]
  5. Int J Integr Care. 2007 Oct 18;7:e39 [PMID: 18043723]
  6. J Clin Nurs. 2004 Oct;13(7):876-85 [PMID: 15361161]
  7. Int J Integr Care. 2010 Apr 29;10:e043 [PMID: 20543972]
  8. J Interprof Care. 2002 Feb;16(1):7-17 [PMID: 11915720]
  9. J Interprof Care. 2008 Dec;22(6):639-49 [PMID: 19012144]
  10. J Interprof Care. 2014 Jan;28(1):58-63 [PMID: 24000882]
  11. J Manag Med. 2001;15(6):430-45 [PMID: 11811794]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 26;160(12):1825-33 [PMID: 10871977]
  13. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 08;13:e009 [PMID: 23687481]
  14. Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e016 [PMID: 26528093]
  15. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1998 Apr-Jun;13(2):91-106 [PMID: 10185509]
  16. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1373-82 [PMID: 21082871]
  17. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 May;12:1-16 [PMID: 26040019]
  18. Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jan;11 Spec Ed:e007 [PMID: 21677844]
  19. Int J Integr Care. 2011 Jul;11:e124 [PMID: 22125502]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0collaborativeindividualuseplanservicesplanscarecollaborationsocialsubstancepsychiatricactionreportedtreatmentinter-organisationalhealthcarestudycourseRespondentspositiveconsequencesestablishingBACKGROUND:Well-functioningpeopledisorderspresumesdifferentpartiescentreswellAccordingSwedishlawiewrittensupportstructuredestablishedHoweverindicationsusedsatisfactoryextentAIM:explorecurrentamongunitsStockholmCountyDESIGN:usescross-sectionaldesignParticipants=797specificallyaimedimprovingknowledgeinvitedtakepartpriorattendingtotal705participantsacceptedDatacollectedelectronicquestionnairesentparticipant'sworkplaceNon-respondentsofferedpaperversionfilloutRESULTS:participatingonetwopermonth70%usingparticulartemplateperceivedmainlyinstanceclarifiesmeasuresperformedresponsibleCONCLUSIONS:AlthoughrespondentsgenerallythereoflowCollaborationcommunityinstitutions:integrated

Similar Articles

Cited By