Faculty perceptions of student plagiarism and interventions to tackle it: a multiphase mixed-methods study in Qatar.

Mai A Mahmoud, Ziyad R Mahfoud, Ming-Jung Ho, John Shatzer
Author Information
  1. Mai A Mahmoud: Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1320 York Avenue, HT-621, New York, NY, 10021, USA. mam2080@qatar-med.cornell.edu. ORCID
  2. Ziyad R Mahfoud: Department of Medical Education, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
  3. Ming-Jung Ho: Department of Family Medicine, Center for Innovation and Leadership in Education (CENTILE), Georgetown University Medical Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
  4. John Shatzer: Johns Hopkins University School of Education, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of the internet and other digital resources has contributed to the escalation of plagiarism among medical students and students of other healthcare professions. Concerns were raised by faculty at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q), a branch of Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University in New York, who had been observing plagiarism in students' assignments.
METHODS: To identify the extent of plagiarism practices and their contributing factors, a two-phase mixed-method research study was conducted, comprising a survey administered in 2013, followed by longitudinal interventions, and a second survey in 2017 to measure the impact of the interventions.
RESULTS: By Phase II, overall observed plagiarism incidents per year decreased from 44 to 28%, and the number of faculty who observed no plagiarism incidents increased significantly from 12 to 37%. The faculty concerned about student plagiarism decreased by 33% [53.1 to 20%] between Phase I and Phase II.
CONCLUSION: When students are provided with information regarding what constitutes plagiarism and their institution's policy in response to plagiarism incidents, they are less likely to engage in such practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):672-9 [PMID: 17014934]
  2. Med Teach. 2016 Dec;38(12):1262-1266 [PMID: 27631714]
  3. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Sep;81(9):787-795 [PMID: 30173724]
  4. J Nurs Educ. 2009 Nov;48(11):614-23 [PMID: 19650608]
  5. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1372669 [PMID: 28918704]
  6. Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):925 [PMID: 20520050]
  7. J Dent Educ. 2007 Aug;71(8):1027-39 [PMID: 17687085]
  8. ABNF J. 2009 Winter;20(1):17-21 [PMID: 19278183]
  9. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):285 [PMID: 27821170]
  10. Med Teach. 2013 Nov;35(11):e1561-72 [PMID: 24004029]
  11. Nature. 2008 Mar 6;452(7183):29 [PMID: 18322507]
  12. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):767-772 [PMID: 28507368]
  13. J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):315-8 [PMID: 20439329]
  14. Med Educ. 2003 Jul;37(7):589-96 [PMID: 12834415]
  15. Med Teach. 2015 Feb;37(2):162-7 [PMID: 25154773]
  16. Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):463-74 [PMID: 24661014]
  17. Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):104-8 [PMID: 21194646]
  18. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56 [PMID: 24279835]

MeSH Term

Faculty
Humans
New York
Perception
Plagiarism
Qatar

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plagiarismstudentsfacultyCornellinterventionsPhaseincidentsWeillpracticesstudysurveyIIobserveddecreasedstudentBACKGROUND:widespreaduseinternetdigitalresourcescontributedescalationamongmedicalhealthcareprofessionsConcernsraisedMedicine-QatarWCM-QbranchMedicineUniversityNewYorkobservingstudents'assignmentsMETHODS:identifyextentcontributingfactorstwo-phasemixed-methodresearchconductedcomprisingadministered2013followedlongitudinalsecond2017measureimpactRESULTS:overallperyear4428%numberincreasedsignificantly1237%concerned33%[53120%]CONCLUSION:providedinformationregardingconstitutesinstitution'spolicyresponselesslikelyengageFacultyperceptionstackleit:multiphasemixed-methodsQatarAcademicintegrityInternationallearnersMedicalPlagiarismintervention

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.