Simulation as a pedagogical learning method for critical paediatric nursing in Bachelor of Nursing programmes: a qualitative study.

Iben Akselbo, Heidi Killingberg, Ingvild Aune
Author Information
  1. Iben Akselbo: Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), 7004 Trondheim, Norway. ORCID
  2. Heidi Killingberg: Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), 7004 Trondheim, Norway.
  3. Ingvild Aune: Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), 7004 Trondheim, Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the national education plan for Bachelor of Nursing in Norway, it is emphasized that focus areas for practical studies must include experience related to paediatric nursing. However, given the paucity of children's wards in Norwegian hospitals, few students are offered this. The purpose of this study is to explore undergraduate nursing student's perception of using simulation as a learning method to obtain knowledge and skills in delivering quality healthcare to children and their parents in emergencies.
METHOD: A total of 36 students participated in focus groups. The students were asked to reflect on their learning outcomes regarding the educational method during the simulation. In addition, the students were encouraged to discuss whether this pedagogical method was useful in preparing them to deal with critical medical situations in relation to children and their parents. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Three subjects emerged from the analysis. The first, simulation as an educational method, showed that the students thought that simulation gave a greater degree of realism and seriousness than other learning activities. The second subject, preparedness for later practice, showed that the students perceived simulation as one of the ways in which they were best prepared for the profession as a nurse. The students emphasized the benefit of having concentrated on children and their parents. The third subject, stress and leadership, showed that simulation as a method was stressful to most students, and lack of knowledge and anxiety about conducting other students kept them from taking the lead. However, the students experienced that they learned a lot about themselves and how they appear as nurses.
CONCLUSION: The bachelor-level student nurses experienced simulation as a realistic and effective educational method for gaining knowledge in the critical healthcare of children and their parents. Simulation made them reflect on a nurse's area of responsibility in emergencies. When offered practical experience in children's wards, the use of simulation as a didactic method may help students develop sufficient competence to act appropriately and expediently in critical paediatric nursing settings.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study (number 52776) was approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data.

Keywords

References

  1. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Nov;15(11):2666-2706 [PMID: 29135750]
  2. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):96-103 [PMID: 15921126]
  3. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(16):661-694 [PMID: 27820553]
  4. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Mar;23:40-47 [PMID: 28214431]
  5. Clin Teach. 2015 Jun;12(3):171-5 [PMID: 26009951]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:419-21 [PMID: 26599594]
  7. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 May 17;1:13 [PMID: 29449982]
  8. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jan;48:140-144 [PMID: 27810632]
  9. Int J Med Educ. 2015 Nov 22;6:166-71 [PMID: 26590951]
  10. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:85-89 [PMID: 30476728]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:63-71 [PMID: 27902949]
  12. Nurse Educ. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):E6-E9 [PMID: 30052586]
  13. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 May;169(5):419-20 [PMID: 25751767]
  14. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):319-321 [PMID: 29596104]
  15. Public Health Nurs. 2019 Mar;36(2):226-232 [PMID: 30460752]
  16. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  17. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):74-79 [PMID: 28936157]
  18. Disaster Mil Med. 2016 Feb 6;2:4 [PMID: 28265438]
  19. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Mar;71(3):591-8 [PMID: 25384709]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:17-24 [PMID: 28011333]
  21. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1416-21 [PMID: 23218907]
  22. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):554-61 [PMID: 25054868]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentssimulationmethodnursingstudylearningchildrenparentscriticalpaediatricknowledgeeducationalqualitativeshowedSimulationBachelorNursingemphasizedfocuspracticalexperienceHoweverchildren'swardsNorwegianofferedusinghealthcareemergenciesreflectpedagogicalanalysissubjectexperiencednursesstudentBACKGROUND:nationaleducationplanNorwayareasstudiesmustincluderelatedgivenpaucityhospitalspurposeexploreundergraduatestudent'sperceptionobtainskillsdeliveringqualityMETHOD:total36participatedgroupsaskedoutcomesregardingadditionencourageddiscusswhetherusefulpreparingdealmedicalsituationsrelationinterviewstranscribedanalyzedcontentRESULTS:ThreesubjectsemergedfirstthoughtgavegreaterdegreerealismseriousnessactivitiessecondpreparednesslaterpracticeperceivedonewaysbestpreparedprofessionnursebenefitconcentratedthirdstressleadershipstressfullackanxietyconductingkepttakingleadlearnedlotappearCONCLUSION:bachelor-levelrealisticeffectivegainingmadenurse'sarearesponsibilityusedidacticmayhelpdevelopsufficientcompetenceactappropriatelyexpedientlysettingsTRIALREGISTRATION:number52776approvedCentreResearchDataprogrammes:LearningNursePaediatricemergency

Similar Articles

Cited By