3D tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using deep convolutional neural network.

Yanfeng Li, Wen Wu, Houjin Chen, Lin Cheng, Shu Wang
Author Information
  1. Yanfeng Li: School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
  2. Wen Wu: School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
  3. Houjin Chen: School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
  4. Lin Cheng: Center for Breast, People's Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
  5. Shu Wang: Center for Breast, People's Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) has drawn attention in breast disease detection and diagnosis applications. Reviewing hundreds of slices produced by ABUS is time-consuming. In this paper, a tumor detection method for ABUS image based on convolutional neural network is proposed.
METHODS: First, integrating multitask learning with YOLOv3, an improved YOLOv3 detection network is designed to detect tumor candidate in two-dimensional (2D) slices. Two-dimensional detection separately treats each slice, leading to larger differences of position and score for tumor candidate in adjacent slices. Due to the influence of artifact, noise, and mammary tissues, 2D detection may include many false positive regions. To alleviate these problems, a rescoring processing algorithm is first designed. Then three-dimensional volume forming and FP reduction scheme are built.
RESULTS: This method was tested on 340 volumes (124 patients, 181 tumors) with fivefold cross validation. It achieved sensitivities of 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, and 70% at 7.42, 3.31, 1.62, 1.23, and 0.88 false positives per volume.
CONCLUSION: Compared with existing ABUS tumor detection methods, our method gets a promising result.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Kim SJ. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:99-103.
  2. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH. Current status of automated breast ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2015;34:165-172.
  3. Wiskin J, Malik B, Natesan R, Lenox M. Quantitative assessment of breast density using transmission ultrasound tomography. Med Phys. 2019;46:2610-2620.
  4. Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, et al. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys. 2004;31:549-555.
  5. Cao Z, Yang G, Chen Q, Chen X, Lv F. Breast tumor classification through learning from noisy labeled ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2020;47:1048-1057.
  6. Lo CM, Chen RT, Chang YC, et al. Multi-dimensional tumor detection in automated whole breast ultrasound using topographic watershed. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:1503-1511.
  7. Yap MH, Pons G, Martí J, et al. Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;22:1218-1226.
  8. Brem RF, Lenihan MJ, Lieberman J, Torrente J. Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:234-240.
  9. Moon WK, Shen YW, Bae MS, Huang C, Chen J, Chang R. Computer-aided tumor detection based on multi-scale blob detection algorithm in automated breast ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32:1191-1200.
  10. Ihnatsenka B, Boezaart AP. Ultrasound: basic understanding and learning the language. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2010;4:55-62.
  11. Moon WK, Lo CM, Chen RT, et al. Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound images using quantitative tissue clustering. Med Phys. 2014;41:042901.
  12. Kozegar E, Soryani M, Behnam H, Salamati M, Tan T. Breast cancer detection in automated 3D breast ultrasound using iso-contours and cascaded rusboosts. Ultrasonics. 2017;79:68-80.
  13. Tan T, Mordang JJ, Zelst J, et al. Computer-aided detection of breast cancers using Haar-like features in automated 3D breast ultrasound. Med Phys. 2015;42:1498-1504.
  14. Shen D, Wu G, Suk H. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:221-248.
  15. Hiramatsu Y, Muramatsu C, Kobayashi H, Hara T, Fujita H. Automated detection of masses on whole breast volume ultrasound scanner: false positive reduction using deep convolutional neural network. Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 101342S. SPIE; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2254581
  16. Muramatsu C, Hiramatsu Y, Fujita H, Kobayashi H, Mass detection on automated breast ultrasound volume scans using convolutional neural network. In 2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT). IEEE; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAIT.2018.8369795
  17. Chiang T, Huang Y, Chen R, Huang C, Chang R. Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using 3-D CNN and prioritized candidate aggregation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38:240-249.
  18. Moon WK, Haung YS, Hsu CH, et al. Computer-aided tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using a 3-D convolutional neural network. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;190:105360.
  19. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). June 2014; OH, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2014.81
  20. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016;39:1137-1149.
  21. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Ali F. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016; NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91
  22. Redmon J, Farhadi A. YOLOv3. An Incremental Improvement; 2018: arXiv:1804.02767.
  23. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016; NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
  24. Lin T-Y, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), July 2016; HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.106
  25. Lin T-Y, Maire M, Belongie S, et al. Microsoft coco: common objects in context. European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48
  26. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li LJ, Li K, Fei-Fei L. ImageNet: a largescale hierarchical image database. CVPR; 2009.
  27. Miller H. The FROC curve: a representation of the observer’s performance for the method of free response. J Acoustical Soc Am. 1969;46:1473-1476.

Grants

  1. 2019TSLH0206/Shandong Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project
  2. 61872030/National Nature Science Foundation of China
  3. 2019TSLH0206]/Shandong Province
  4. 2019TSLH0206/Shandong Province

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Neoplasms
Neural Networks, Computer
Ultrasonography, Mammary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0detectiontumorABUSbreastultrasoundslicesmethodnetworkYOLOv3falseconvolutionalneuralmultitasklearningdesignedcandidate2Dpositivevolumereduction1automatedPURPOSE:AutomateddrawnattentiondiseasediagnosisapplicationsReviewinghundredsproducedtime-consumingpaperimagebasedproposedMETHODS:Firstintegratingimproveddetecttwo-dimensionalTwo-dimensionalseparatelytreatssliceleadinglargerdifferencespositionscoreadjacentDueinfluenceartifactnoisemammarytissuesmayincludemanyregionsalleviateproblemsrescoringprocessingalgorithmfirstthree-dimensionalformingFPschemebuiltRESULTS:tested340volumes124patients181tumorsfivefoldcrossvalidationachievedsensitivities90%85%80%75%70%7423316223088positivesperCONCLUSION:Comparedexistingmethodsgetspromisingresult3Dusingdeep

Similar Articles

Cited By