Pre-Sleep Low Glycemic Index Modified Starch Does Not Improve Next-Morning Fuel Selection or Running Performance in Male and Female Endurance Athletes.

Monique D Dudar, Emilie D Bode, Karly R Fishkin, Rochelle A Brown, Madeleine M Carre, Noa R Mills, Michael J Ormsbee, Stephen J Ives
Author Information
  1. Monique D Dudar: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  2. Emilie D Bode: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  3. Karly R Fishkin: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  4. Rochelle A Brown: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  5. Madeleine M Carre: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  6. Noa R Mills: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
  7. Michael J Ormsbee: Department of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sport Sciences and Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. ORCID
  8. Stephen J Ives: Health and Human Physiological Sciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA. ORCID

Abstract

To determine the effects of pre-sleep supplementation with a novel low glycemic index (LGI) carbohydrate (CHO) on next-morning substrate utilization, gastrointestinal distress (GID), and endurance running performance (5-km time-trial, TT). Using a double-blind, randomized, placebo (PLA) controlled, crossover design, trained participants ( = 14; 28 ± 9 years, 8/6 male/female, 55 ± 7 mL/kg/min) consumed a LGI, high glycemic index (HGI), or 0 kcal PLA supplement ≥ 2 h after their last meal and <30 min prior to sleep. Upon arrival, resting energy expenditure (REE), substrate utilization, blood glucose, satiety, and GID were assessed. An incremental exercise test (IET) was performed at 55, 65, and 75% peak volume of oxygen consumption (VO) with GID, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and substrate utilization recorded each stage. Finally, participants completed the 5-km TT. There were no differences in any baseline measure. During IET, CHO utilization tended to be greater with LGI (PLA, 56 ± 11; HGI, 60 ± 14; LGI, 63 ± 14%, = 0.16, = 0.14). GID was unaffected by supplementation at any point ( > 0.05). Performance was also unaffected by supplement (PLA, 21.6 ± 9.5; HGI, 23.0 ± 7.8; LGI, 24.1 ± 4.5 min, = 0.94, = 0.01). Pre-sleep CHO supplementation did not affect next-morning resting metabolism, BG, GID, or 5-km TT performance. The trend towards higher CHO utilization during IET after pre-sleep LGI, suggests that such supplementation increases morning CHO availability.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2016 Jun 25;8(7): [PMID: 27347999]
  2. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Sep;98(2):139-51 [PMID: 16896734]
  3. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Mar;62(3):983-8 [PMID: 3571097]
  4. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009 Sep;4(3):331-44 [PMID: 19953821]
  5. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Oct;51(4):783-7 [PMID: 7028704]
  6. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Oct;97(4):1245-53 [PMID: 15155717]
  7. Nutrition. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):669-77 [PMID: 15212750]
  8. Int J Sport Nutr. 1992 Mar;2(1):48-59 [PMID: 1338583]
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Mar;31(3):393-9 [PMID: 10188743]
  10. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7 [PMID: 11733293]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jan;31(1):164-70 [PMID: 9927025]
  12. Int J Sports Med. 1991 Apr;12(2):180-6 [PMID: 1860741]
  13. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 Sep;71(3):1082-8 [PMID: 1757304]
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Apr;50(4):827-836 [PMID: 29166321]
  15. Int J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;31(10):704-8 [PMID: 20617481]
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Nov;88(5):1272-6 [PMID: 18996862]
  17. J Sports Sci. 1996 Aug;14(4):321-7 [PMID: 8887211]
  18. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):287-90 [PMID: 12098173]
  19. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;94(6):1570-81 [PMID: 10364027]
  20. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2005 Jun;15(3):308-22 [PMID: 16131700]
  21. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;44(4):368-72 [PMID: 15051743]
  22. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Jun 20;14:20 [PMID: 28642676]
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1374-9 [PMID: 17762371]
  24. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;62(5):608-16 [PMID: 17440522]
  25. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 01;7(5):1294-304 [PMID: 24124957]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Feb;44(2):344-51 [PMID: 21775906]
  27. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Aug;55(2):628-34 [PMID: 6618956]
  28. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006 Oct;31(5):502-11 [PMID: 17111004]
  29. Nutr Rev. 2017 May 1;75(5):327-338 [PMID: 28383695]
  30. J Clin Invest. 1974 Apr;53(4):1080-90 [PMID: 4815076]
  31. J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1204-7 [PMID: 18076252]
  32. Int J Sports Med. 1997 Oct;18(7):543-8 [PMID: 9414079]
  33. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013 Dec;64(8):1001-6 [PMID: 23937441]
  34. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Jan;88(4-5):459-65 [PMID: 12527978]
  35. Br J Sports Med. 1994 Jun;28(2):105-9 [PMID: 7921908]
  36. Nutrition. 2011 Jun;27(6):659-65 [PMID: 20951003]
  37. J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Jan;13(1):182-8 [PMID: 19230767]
  38. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Aug;81(2):853-7 [PMID: 8872656]
  39. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2009 Mar-Apr;8(2):85-91 [PMID: 19276909]
  40. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000 Mar;10(1):51-61 [PMID: 10722781]
  41. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Nov;89(5):1845-51 [PMID: 11053335]
  42. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Nov;54(5):866-70 [PMID: 1951158]
  43. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2002 Jun;12(2):157-71 [PMID: 12187616]
  44. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jul;41(7):719-27 [PMID: 27329516]
  45. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jun;31(6):767-73 [PMID: 10378901]
  46. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Oct;16(5):510-27 [PMID: 17240783]
  47. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Jun;17(3):232-43 [PMID: 17693685]
  48. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007 Jun;30(3):350-7 [PMID: 17514432]
  49. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 May;61(5):590-6 [PMID: 17136034]
  50. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;241(1):45-57 [PMID: 4278539]
  51. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jun;30(6):844-9 [PMID: 9624641]
  52. Metabolism. 2001 Jul;50(7):849-55 [PMID: 11436193]
  53. Am J Physiol. 1993 Sep;265(3 Pt 1):E380-91 [PMID: 8214047]
  54. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12(6):697-703 [PMID: 18789762]

MeSH Term

Adult
Athletes
Athletic Performance
Blood Glucose
Cross-Over Studies
Dietary Carbohydrates
Double-Blind Method
Energy Metabolism
Female
Glycemic Index
Humans
Male
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Endurance
Placebos
Running
Satiation
Sleep
Starch

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Dietary Carbohydrates
Placebos
Starch

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0±0LGIutilizationCHOGID=supplementationsubstratePLA5-kmTT14HGIIETpre-sleepglycemicindexnext-morninggastrointestinaldistressperformanceparticipants9557supplementminrestingsatietyexerciseunaffectedPerformance5determineeffectsnovellowcarbohydrateendurancerunningtime-trialUsingdouble-blindrandomizedplacebocontrolledcrossoverdesigntrained28years8/6male/femalemL/kg/minconsumedhighkcal2hlastmeal<30priorsleepUponarrivalenergyexpenditureREEbloodglucoseassessedincrementaltestperformed6575%peakvolumeoxygenconsumptionVOratingperceivedexertionRPErecordedstageFinallycompleteddifferencesbaselinemeasuretendedgreater5611606314%16point>05also21623824149401Pre-sleepaffectmetabolismBGtrendtowardshighersuggestsincreasesmorningavailabilityPre-SleepLowGlycemicIndexModifiedStarchImproveNext-MorningFuelSelectionRunningMaleFemaleEnduranceAthletescarbohydratesfatoxidationfatiguetimetrial

Similar Articles

Cited By