Health Design Thinking: An Innovative Approach in Public Health to Defining Problems and Finding Solutions.

Sylvie Abookire, Colin Plover, Rosemary Frasso, Bon Ku
Author Information
  1. Sylvie Abookire: Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  2. Colin Plover: Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  3. Rosemary Frasso: Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  4. Bon Ku: Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Abstract

Current trends in the United States health care landscape call for innovative and adaptive approaches to improve outcomes and reduce inefficiencies. Design Thinking is an innovative approach to problem-solving that leverages insights from the end-users of new products, services, and experiences in order to develop best-fit solutions that are rapidly prototyped and iteratively refined. When compared to traditional problem-solving methods in health care and other public health adjacent fields, Design Thinking leads to more successful and sustainable interventions. Design Thinking has facilitated improvements in patient, provider, and community satisfaction, and in public health, has increased efficiency and collaboration in intervention development. Given the promising nature of Design Thinking as an effective problem-solving method, it follows that Design Thinking training would prove a beneficial addition to public health education. The integration of Design Thinking in public health education may equip public health leaders with essential skills necessary to understand and more effectively approach historically intractable challenges. This article describes the development and evaluation of a hands-on Design Thinking workshop, piloted with Master of Public Health (MPH) students in April, 2019 at Thomas Jefferson University. Preceding and following the workshop, evaluation forms were used to assess participants' knowledge about Design Thinking concepts and attitudes towards the workshop experience. Metrics were aligned with established learning objectives related to process, impact, and outcomes of the workshop. We hypothesized that the workshop intervention would increase participants understanding of Design Thinking concepts and applications in public health. Evaluations demonstrated that after attending the workshop, participants were able to understand and apply Design Thinking concepts in a public health context. Following the evaluation of pilot data, the workshop was refined and embedded in the MPH curriculum at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, PA.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e317 [PMID: 27986647]
  2. Design Health (Abingdon). 2018;2(2):236-252 [PMID: 31773070]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(S2):S116 [PMID: 30785799]
  4. Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):621-2 [PMID: 26959263]
  5. J Health Commun. 2014 Dec;19(12):1460-71 [PMID: 25491581]
  6. Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2094-102 [PMID: 20864728]
  7. Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 07;5:192 [PMID: 28824899]
  8. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:303-329 [PMID: 28972525]
  9. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Dec;19(12):2552-9 [PMID: 26197732]
  10. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Dec 20;9:151 [PMID: 23256730]
  11. Implement Sci. 2019 Feb 28;14(1):18 [PMID: 30819223]
  12. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117 [PMID: 30264690]
  13. Popul Health Manag. 2018 Feb;21(1):13-19 [PMID: 28537786]
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 14;21(1):e11528 [PMID: 31344671]

MeSH Term

Creativity
Curriculum
Humans
Philadelphia
Problem Solving
Public Health
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DesignhealthThinkingpublicworkshopproblem-solvingeducationevaluationHealthconceptscareinnovativeoutcomesapproachrefinedinterventiondevelopmentunderstandPublicMPHThomasJeffersonUniversityparticipantsdesignCurrenttrendsUnitedStateslandscapecalladaptiveapproachesimprovereduceinefficienciesleveragesinsightsend-usersnewproductsservicesexperiencesorderdevelopbest-fitsolutionsrapidlyprototypediterativelycomparedtraditionalmethodsadjacentfieldsleadssuccessfulsustainableinterventionsfacilitatedimprovementspatientprovidercommunitysatisfactionincreasedefficiencycollaborationGivenpromisingnatureeffectivemethodfollowstrainingprovebeneficialadditionintegrationmayequipleadersessentialskillsnecessaryeffectivelyhistoricallyintractablechallengesarticledescribeshands-onpilotedMasterstudentsApril2019Precedingfollowingformsusedassessparticipants'knowledgeattitudestowardsexperienceMetricsalignedestablishedlearningobjectivesrelatedprocessimpacthypothesizedincreaseunderstandingapplicationsEvaluationsdemonstratedattendingableapplycontextFollowingpilotdataembeddedcurriculumPhiladelphiaPAThinking:InnovativeApproachDefiningProblemsFindingSolutionsthinkinghuman-centeredinnovation

Similar Articles

Cited By