The Relationship Between Youth Cyberbullying Behaviors and Their Perceptions of Parental Emotional Support.

Laura Grunin, Gary Yu, Sally S Cohen
Author Information
  1. Laura Grunin: New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, 433 First Avenue, New York, NY 10010 USA.
  2. Gary Yu: New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, 433 First Avenue, New York, NY 10010 USA.
  3. Sally S Cohen: New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, 433 First Avenue, New York, NY 10010 USA.

Abstract

Studies of bullying among youth usually focus on those who are bullied. Understanding the factors that affect youth who exhibit bullying behaviors is equally important. Such knowledge can heighten effectiveness of prevention and interventions at the individual, family, school, and community levels. We performed a secondary data analysis using data from the 2009 to 2010 World Health Organization's (WHO's) Health Behavior in School-Aged Children cross-sectional survey ( = 12,642), the most recent WHO data collected in the USA. Using latent class analysis, we clustered sample participants into categories of children who do bully, bully with a cyberbullying element, bully with a cyberbullying element, and bully with a cyberbullying element. We used multinomial logistic regression to explore the relationships between youth's perception of certain family characteristics (e.g., parental emotional support and socio-demographic characteristics) and the odds ratios of falling into one of the four latent classes generated. Establishing if a relationship exists between youth's perception of parental support factors and their bullying behavior can enhance understanding of variables that might modify adolescents' bullying. Findings of this study point to the importance of parental emotional support as a factor that can affect adolescent cyberbullying behavior. This evidence is useful for parents, education and healthcare professionals, and others involved in young people's lives.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sch Health. 2010 Dec;80(12):614-21; quiz 622-4 [PMID: 21087257]
  2. J Adolesc. 2018 Apr;64:109-123 [PMID: 29448185]
  3. Int J Public Health. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 2:140-50 [PMID: 19639259]
  4. Int J Behav Med. 2019 Apr;26(2):175-184 [PMID: 30635873]
  5. J Youth Adolesc. 2013 May;42(5):711-22 [PMID: 23296318]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 05;10(12):6820-31 [PMID: 24317387]
  7. Int J Psychoanal. 1960 Mar-Jun;41:89-113 [PMID: 13803480]
  8. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:139-143 [PMID: 29279213]
  9. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Oct;45(4):368-75 [PMID: 19766941]
  10. J Child Fam Stud. 2017 May;26(5):1388-1397 [PMID: 30828238]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 27;15(12): [PMID: 30486401]
  12. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):354-380 [PMID: 29294894]
  13. Stat Med. 1986 Jan-Feb;5(1):21-7 [PMID: 3961312]
  14. Arch Sex Behav. 2016 May;45(4):975-81 [PMID: 26728055]
  15. Violence Vict. 2016;31(4):638-63 [PMID: 27506491]
  16. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Feb;44(2):421-8 [PMID: 25104104]
  17. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:109-38 [PMID: 20192788]
  18. J Adolesc. 2015 Jun;41:86-95 [PMID: 25828551]
  19. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1707-15 [PMID: 22327406]
  20. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2017 Oct 16;4:e19 [PMID: 29230315]
  21. Public Health. 2016 Mar;132:72-8 [PMID: 26718424]
  22. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 May;21(5):294-303 [PMID: 29762067]
  23. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 24;5(2):e83 [PMID: 27220556]
  24. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Nov;59(5):502-509 [PMID: 27528471]
  25. Child Dev. 1991 Oct;62(5):1049-65 [PMID: 1756655]
  26. J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Feb;48(2):399-409 [PMID: 30478820]
  27. J Sch Nurs. 2020 Aug;36(4):251-257 [PMID: 30665324]
  28. J Sch Nurs. 2018 Feb;34(1):38-50 [PMID: 29103352]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bullyingbullycyberbullyingsupportcandataanalysiselementparentalyouthfactorsaffectfamilyHealthlatentclassyouth'sperceptioncharacteristicsemotionalbehaviorCyberbullyingParentalStudiesamongusuallyfocusbulliedUnderstandingexhibitbehaviorsequallyimportantknowledgeheighteneffectivenesspreventioninterventionsindividualschoolcommunitylevelsperformedsecondaryusing20092010WorldOrganization'sWHO'sBehaviorSchool-AgedChildrencross-sectionalsurvey = 12642recentWHOcollectedUSAUsingclusteredsampleparticipantscategorieschildrenusedmultinomiallogisticregressionexplorerelationshipscertainegsocio-demographicoddsratiosfallingonefourclassesgeneratedEstablishingrelationshipexistsenhanceunderstandingvariablesmightmodifyadolescents'Findingsstudypointimportancefactoradolescentevidenceusefulparentseducationhealthcareprofessionalsothersinvolvedyoungpeople'slivesRelationshipYouthBehaviorsPerceptionsEmotionalSupportAdolescentsBullyingLatent

Similar Articles

Cited By