The importance of acquisition learning on nicotine and varenicline drug substitution in a drug-discriminated goal-tracking task.

Brady M Thompson, Scott T Barrett, Y Wendy Huynh, David A Kwan, Jennifer E Murray, Rick A Bevins
Author Information
  1. Brady M Thompson: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  2. Scott T Barrett: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  3. Y Wendy Huynh: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  4. David A Kwan: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  5. Jennifer E Murray: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
  6. Rick A Bevins: Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: rbevins1@unl.edu.

Abstract

nicotine and varenicline (Chantix®; the leading non-nicotine cessation pharmacotherapy) can come to control appetitive behaviors such as goal-tracking. We tested Rats (N = 48) in a drug-discriminated goal-tracking (DGT) task where each rat received daily subcutaneous injections of either nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) or saline (0.9% [w/v]) interspersed across the acquisition phase (Phase 1). On saline days, sucrose was intermittently available. On nicotine days, sucrose was withheld. All Rats acquired the discrimination with increased goal-tracking rates on saline days relative to nicotine days. Following acquisition, Rats were separated into four groups to assess drug-substitution and discrimination reversal in Phase 2. The first group maintained the stimulus-reinforcer relation from acquisition (NIC-). The reversal group was now given access to sucrose on nicotine days (NIC+). The substitution group replaced nicotine with varenicline (1 mg/kg) while maintaining the acquisition stimulus-reinforcer relation (VAR-). The substitution and reversal group had nicotine replaced by varenicline and the stimulus-reinforcer relation reversed (VAR+). Rats in all groups learned or maintained their Phase 1 discriminations. For Phase 2, the reversal groups (+ conditions) acquired their discriminations within 10 sessions. The VAR- group displayed a pattern of disrupted discrimination at the outset of Phase 2 but was reestablished after continued training. In substitution testing, VAR groups received nicotine and NIC groups received varenicline. The NIC- and VAR- groups displayed full substitution of the test stimulus whereas the NIC+ and VAR+ groups displayed partial substitution of the test stimulus. Rats underwent nicotine extinction in Phase 3. Initial responding for each group mimicked Phase 2 training (i.e., higher responding by the reversal groups). All Rats maintained similarly low levels of responding after six sessions. In conclusion, initial learning history with nicotine (i.e., + or -) influenced drug-stimulus substitution and the rate at which new learning (e.g., reversal) occurs with the varenicline and nicotine interoceptive stimuli.

References

  1. J Subst Abuse. 1989;1(3):287-300 [PMID: 2535609]
  2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD009329 [PMID: 23728690]
  3. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Feb;190(3):353-62 [PMID: 16847680]
  4. J Med Chem. 2005 May 19;48(10):3474-7 [PMID: 15887955]
  5. Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun;127(3):465-73 [PMID: 23731077]
  6. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Mar;232(5):975-83 [PMID: 25209677]
  7. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Feb;190(2):157-70 [PMID: 17115136]
  8. Biol Sex Differ. 2019 Jul 17;10(1):37 [PMID: 31315660]
  9. Behav Processes. 2012 May;90(1):28-33 [PMID: 22119845]
  10. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014 Aug 20;5(8):624-31 [PMID: 25010473]
  11. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):876-84 [PMID: 22048468]
  12. Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):463-91 [PMID: 19393839]
  13. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Mar;14(3):299-305 [PMID: 21994342]
  14. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Dec;232(23):4347-58 [PMID: 26364957]
  15. Behav Processes. 2019 Jan;158:144-150 [PMID: 30445119]
  16. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2009 Sep;2(3):243-55 [PMID: 20443771]
  17. Behav Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;29(6):493-502 [PMID: 29634495]
  18. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2009;55:91-109 [PMID: 19013940]
  19. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Aug;237(8):2395-2404 [PMID: 32448943]
  20. Neuropharmacology. 2017 Feb;113(Pt A):354-366 [PMID: 27765626]
  21. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Jan;91(3):461-7 [PMID: 18817808]
  22. Toxicology. 2016 Jul 15;365:67-75 [PMID: 27477296]
  23. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Mar;234(5):781-792 [PMID: 28028600]
  24. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Jan;68(1):135-45 [PMID: 11274718]
  25. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):367-81 [PMID: 16205918]
  26. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Feb;190(3):269-319 [PMID: 16896961]
  27. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004 Sep;3(3):143-58 [PMID: 15653812]
  28. Neuropharmacology. 2010 Jun;58(8):1237-45 [PMID: 20302882]
  29. J Gen Psychol. 2013 Jul-Sep;140(3):187-203 [PMID: 24837654]
  30. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Jun;181:9-16 [PMID: 30954637]

Grants

  1. P20 GM130461/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. R01 DA034389/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. R01 DA046109/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Discrimination Learning
Drug Substitution
Goals
Male
Nicotine
Nicotinic Agonists
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Smoking Cessation Agents
Varenicline

Chemicals

Nicotinic Agonists
Smoking Cessation Agents
Nicotine
Varenicline

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nicotinegroupsPhasesubstitutionvareniclinereversalgroupacquisitiondaysgoal-trackingrats2receivedsalinesucrosediscriminationmaintainedstimulus-reinforcerrelationVAR-displayedrespondingelearningdrug-discriminatedtask01acquiredNIC-NIC+replacedVAR+Ratsdiscriminations+sessionstrainingteststimulusiNicotineChantix®leadingnon-nicotinecessationpharmacotherapycancomecontrolappetitivebehaviorstestedN = 48DGTratdailysubcutaneousinjectionseither4 mg/kg9%[w/v]interspersedacrossphaseintermittentlyavailablewithheldincreasedratesrelativeFollowingseparatedfourassessdrug-substitutionfirstnowgivenaccess1 mg/kgmaintainingreversedlearnedconditionswithin10patterndisruptedoutsetreestablishedcontinuedtestingVARNICfullwhereaspartialunderwentextinction3Initialmimickedhighersimilarlylowlevelssixconclusioninitialhistory-influenceddrug-stimulusratenewgoccursinteroceptivestimuliimportancedrug

Similar Articles

Cited By