Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda.

Jonathan Peñalver, Marisa Salanova, Isabel M Martínez
Author Information
  1. Jonathan Peñalver: Department of Education, Universidad Internacional de Valencia, 21, 46002 Valencia, Spain. ORCID
  2. Marisa Salanova: WANT Research Team, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain. ORCID
  3. Isabel M Martínez: WANT Research Team, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain.

Abstract

Group positive affect is defined as homogeneous positive affect among group members that emerges when working together. Considering that previous research has shown a significant relationship between group positive affect and a wide variety of group outcomes (e.g., behaviors, wellbeing, and performance), it is crucial to boost our knowledge about this construct in the work context. The main purpose is to review empirical research, to synthesize the findings and to provide research agenda about group positive affect, in order to better understand this construct. Through the PsycNET and Proquest Central databases, an integrative review was conducted to identify articles about group positive affect published between January 1990 and March 2019. A total of 44 articles were included and analyzed. Finding suggests that scholars have been more interested in understanding the outcomes of group positive affect and how to improve the productivity of groups than in knowing what the antecedents are. A summary conclusion is that group positive affect is related to leadership, job demands, job resources, diversity/similarity, group processes, and contextual factors, all of which influence the development of several outcomes and different types of wellbeing at the individual and group levels. However, with specific combinations of other conditions (e.g., group trust, negative affect, and interaction), high levels of group positive affect could cause harmful results. Conclusions shed light on group positive affect research and practice and might help Human Resources professionals to initiate empirically-based strategies related to recruitment, group design and leadership training.

Keywords

References

  1. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):167-82 [PMID: 26208085]
  2. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285 [PMID: 27732008]
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):956-68 [PMID: 14599257]
  4. Psicothema. 2012 Feb;24(1):94-9 [PMID: 22269370]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1214-27 [PMID: 25495091]
  6. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):219-30 [PMID: 10784286]
  7. J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):421-34 [PMID: 22181678]
  8. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2010 Mar;8(1):102-6 [PMID: 26761761]
  9. Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):803-55 [PMID: 16351326]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1): [PMID: 31861812]
  11. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):162-76 [PMID: 19186902]
  12. Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jul;12(3):417-9 [PMID: 26207140]
  13. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319 [PMID: 21850154]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 06;16(3): [PMID: 30736334]
  15. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):285-309 [PMID: 17599783]
  16. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 [PMID: 3397865]
  17. Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Summer;17(3):715-34 [PMID: 16262989]
  18. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):53-74 [PMID: 25938701]
  19. J Appl Psychol. 1988 May;73(2):193-8 [PMID: 3384771]
  20. Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):218-26 [PMID: 11315248]
  21. J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):558-73 [PMID: 21341884]
  22. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):3-19 [PMID: 26391957]
  23. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):546-53 [PMID: 16268861]
  24. Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):217-34 [PMID: 24905387]

MeSH Term

Affect
Australia
Facial Expression
Group Processes
Humans
Leadership
Workplace

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupaffectpositiveresearchoutcomesreviewGroupegwellbeingperformanceconstructintegrativearticlesantecedentsrelatedleadershipjoblevelsdefinedhomogeneousamongmembersemergesworkingtogetherConsideringpreviousshownsignificantrelationshipwidevarietybehaviorscrucialboostknowledgeworkcontextmainpurposeempiricalsynthesizefindingsprovideagendaorderbetterunderstandPsycNETProquestCentraldatabasesconductedidentifypublishedJanuary1990March2019total44includedanalyzedFindingsuggestsscholarsinterestedunderstandingimproveproductivitygroupsknowingsummaryconclusiondemandsresourcesdiversity/similarityprocessescontextualfactorsinfluencedevelopmentseveraldifferenttypesindividualHoweverspecificcombinationsconditionstrustnegativeinteractionhighcauseharmfulresultsConclusionsshedlightpracticemighthelpHumanResourcesprofessionalsinitiateempirically-basedstrategiesrecruitmentdesigntrainingPositiveAffectBeyond:IntegrativeReviewFutureResearchAgendahappy-productivemediatorspitfalls

Similar Articles

Cited By