Safety and efficacy of fentanyl versus pethidine in cataract surgery under propofol- based sedation: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Hamidreza Shetabi, Seyed Jalal Hashemi, Fariba Haghi, Dariush Moradi Farsani
Author Information
  1. Hamidreza Shetabi: Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  2. Seyed Jalal Hashemi: Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  3. Fariba Haghi: Student Research Committee, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  4. Dariush Moradi Farsani: Department of Anesthesiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fentanyl and pethidine on the sedative quality of patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Propofol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, patients who were candidates for elective phacoemulsification surgery with topical anesthesia were enrolled. The selected patients were randomly allocated into the two groups for receiving sedation with Propofol-Pethidine (PP) or propofol-fentanyl (PF) combinations. Demographic characteristics, hemodynamic parameters before, during, and after the operation, sedation and pain scores, and patients' and surgeons' satisfaction scores were compared in the two studied groups.
RESULTS: In this trial, 70 patients (35 patients in each group) have completed the study. Mean (standard deviation) operation time was 22.9 (6.8) and 25.46 (7.7) minutes in PF and PP groups ( = 0.118).Mean pain score in PF 0.46 (0.14) was significantly higher than PP groups 0.236 (0.06) ( = 0.011). The mean value of diastolic and systolic blood pressures, pulse rate, and mean arterial pressure dioxide were significantly decreased in both PF and PP groups ( < 0.001), although there was no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated the equivalence effects on hemodynamic parameters for both pethidine and fentanyl in combination with propofol in which they could provide appropriate sedation and safe anesthesia with lower complications and acceptable patients' and surgeons' satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Mo Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;113(1):58-62 [PMID: 27039493]
  2. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):618-625 [PMID: 30429746]
  3. Br J Pain. 2012 Feb;6(1):11-6 [PMID: 26516461]
  4. Ophthalmologica. 2003 Nov-Dec;217(6):413-6 [PMID: 14573974]
  5. Br J Anaesth. 1990 Jan;64(1):45-7 [PMID: 2302375]
  6. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jul;6(6):801-805 [PMID: 30023057]
  7. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):600-612 [PMID: 28242111]
  8. Dig Dis Sci. 2004 May;49(5):888-91 [PMID: 15259516]
  9. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1429-35 [PMID: 23885165]
  10. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;22(1):4-9 [PMID: 21107260]
  11. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000 Feb;11(1):7-11 [PMID: 10724831]
  12. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 14;15:146 [PMID: 26468074]
  13. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 Apr;7(3 Suppl):S3-7 [PMID: 1517629]
  14. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2144-62 [PMID: 23245606]
  15. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Sep;27(9):1372-9 [PMID: 11566518]
  16. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan - Feb;63(1):75-85 [PMID: 28739400]
  17. BJOG. 2015 Jun;122(7):983-92 [PMID: 25558983]
  18. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jun;27(6):880-3 [PMID: 11408135]
  19. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 15;29(8):817-23 [PMID: 19154568]
  20. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):681-7 [PMID: 19251010]
  21. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov;138(5):782-7 [PMID: 15531313]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00groupspatientsfentanylpethidinesurgerysedationPPPFtrialstudyefficacyphacoemulsificationcataractdouble-blindrandomizedcontrolledclinicalanesthesiatwohemodynamicparametersoperationpainscorespatients'surgeons'satisfactionMean467=significantlymeanpropofolBACKGROUND:aimedevaluatesafetysedativequalityunderwentPropofolMATERIALSANDMETHODS:candidateselectivetopicalenrolledselectedrandomlyallocatedreceivingPropofol-Pethidinepropofol-fentanylcombinationsDemographiccharacteristicscomparedstudiedRESULTS:7035groupcompletedstandarddeviationtime2296825minutes118score14higher23606011valuediastolicsystolicbloodpressurespulseratearterialpressuredioxidedecreased<001althoughsignificantdifferenceCONCLUSION:findingsindicatedequivalenceeffectscombinationprovideappropriatesafelowercomplicationsacceptableSafetyversuspropofol-basedsedation:Cataract

Similar Articles

Cited By