Social inequality in infant mortality in Angola: Evidence from a population based study.

Gebretsadik Shibre
Author Information
  1. Gebretsadik Shibre: Department of Reproductive, Family and Population Health, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Within country inequality in infant mortality poses a big challenge for countries moving towards the internationally agreed upon targets on child mortality by 2030. There is a lack of high-quality evidence on infant mortality measured through different dimensions of social inequality in Angola. Thus, this paper was carried out to address the knowledge gap by conducting in-depth examination of infant mortality rate (IMR) inequality among population subgroups to provide more nuanced evidence to help end IMR disparity in the country.
METHODS: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) was used to analyze IMR inequality. HEAT is a software application that facilitates examination of disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health indicators using the WHO Health Equity Monitor (HEM) database. Inequality of IMR was analyzed through disaggregation by five equity stratifiers: education, wealth, gender, subnational region and residence. These were analyzed through three inequality measures: Population Attributable Risk, Ratio and Slope Index of Inequality. A 95% confidence Interval (CI) was built around point estimates to determine statistical significance.
RESULTS: A notable disadvantage was found for children born to poor (Population Attributable Risk (PAR): -27.0; -28.4, -26.0) and uneducated (PAR: -17.0; -17.9, -16.0), women who live in rural areas (PAR: -7.3;-7.8, -6.7) and those residing in certain regions of the country (PAR: -43.0; 45.3, -4). Male infants had a higher risk of death than female infants (PAR: -6.8;-7.5, -6.2). The subnational regional variation of IMR had been the most evident when compared with the disparities in the other equity stratifers.
CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers and planners need to address the disproportionately higher clustering of IMR among infants born to disadvantaged subpopulations through interventions that benefit such subgroups.

References

  1. J Biosoc Sci. 2015 Mar;47(2):165-87 [PMID: 24411023]
  2. Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;45(5):1404-1405e [PMID: 27694569]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:36-46 [PMID: 24560222]
  4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):141 [PMID: 27760520]
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Apr;65(4):327-33 [PMID: 20724284]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(6):321-33 [PMID: 6344225]
  7. SSM Popul Health. 2018 May 09;5:201-209 [PMID: 30094315]
  8. Public Health Rev. 2017 Sep 15;38:21 [PMID: 29450093]
  9. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8736 [PMID: 28821800]
  10. J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):650-7 [PMID: 14709712]
  11. Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jun 1;92(6):405-12 [PMID: 24940014]
  12. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jul;97(4):F285-90 [PMID: 22247413]
  13. Aging Cell. 2015 Jun;14(3):309-21 [PMID: 25720438]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(6):815-22 [PMID: 7973877]
  15. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220076 [PMID: 31356599]
  16. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 09;10(10):e0139545 [PMID: 26452226]
  17. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Sep;95(9):1034-41 [PMID: 27216473]
  18. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):344-6 [PMID: 12700217]
  19. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008 Jan 30;5:3 [PMID: 18234082]

MeSH Term

Angola
Female
Global Health
Health Equity
Health Status Disparities
Health Surveys
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Infant
Infant Mortality
Male
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inequalityIMRmortality0infantPAR:countryHealth-7-6infantschildevidenceaddressexaminationamongpopulationsubgroupsWHOEquityHEATdisparitiesInequalityanalyzedequitysubnationalPopulationAttributableRiskborn-1738higherINTRODUCTION:Withinposesbigchallengecountriesmovingtowardsinternationallyagreedupontargets2030lackhigh-qualitymeasureddifferentdimensionssocialAngolaThuspapercarriedknowledgegapconductingin-depthrateprovidenuancedhelpenddisparityMETHODS:WorldOrganization'sAssessmentToolkitusedanalyzesoftwareapplicationfacilitatesreproductivematernalneonatalhealthindicatorsusingMonitorHEMdatabasedisaggregationfivestratifiers:educationwealthgenderregionresidencethreemeasures:RatioSlopeIndex95%confidenceIntervalCIbuiltaroundpointestimatesdeterminestatisticalsignificanceRESULTS:notabledisadvantagefoundchildrenpoorPAR:-27-284-26uneducated9-16womenliveruralareas7residingcertainregions-4345-4Maleriskdeathfemale52regionalvariationevidentcomparedstratifersCONCLUSIONS:PolicymakersplannersneeddisproportionatelyclusteringdisadvantagedsubpopulationsinterventionsbenefitSocialAngola:Evidencebasedstudy

Similar Articles

Cited By