Between Conspiracy Beliefs, Ingroup Bias, and System Justification: How People Use Defense Strategies to Cope With the Threat of COVID-19.

Chiara A Jutzi, Robin Willardt, Petra C Schmid, Eva Jonas
Author Information
  1. Chiara A Jutzi: Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  2. Robin Willardt: Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  3. Petra C Schmid: Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Z��rich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Eva Jonas: Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Abstract

The current situation around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) portrays a threat to us in several ways: It imposes uncertainty and a lack of control and reminds us of our own mortality. People around the world have reacted to these threats in seemingly unrelated ways: From stockpiling yeast and toilet paper to favoring nationalist ideas or endorsing conspiratorial beliefs. According to the , the confrontation with a threat - a discrepant experience - makes humans react with both proximal and distal threat responses. While the proximal response manifests in behavioral inhibition that leads to heightened anxious arousal and vigilance, distal responses seek to lower behavioral inhibition and the associated state of anxiety and vigilance through engaging in distal defenses. In the present research, we propose that the reactions to COVID-19 may represent distal defense strategies to the pandemic and, therefore, can be explained and forecasted by the model. Thus, we hypothesized increased perceived COVID-19 threat to lead to a proximal threat response in the form of heightened behavioral inhibition. This, in return, should enhance the use of distal defenses (i.e., several ingroup biases, system justification, and conspiratorial beliefs) overlapping with the reactions observed as a response to COVID-19. This hypothesized mediated effect of increased perceived COVID-19 threat on distal defenses was tested in two preregistered studies: In Study 1 ( = 358), results showed perceived COVID-19 threat to be related to behavioral inhibition and, in turn, to be associated with increased distal defenses (i.e., higher entitativity, control restoration motivation, passive party support). In Study 2 ( = 348), we manipulated COVID-19 threat salience and found results suggesting the distal defenses of ingroup entitativity, system justification, and conspiratorial beliefs to be mediated by the proximal threat response. The results of the present research hint toward a common mechanism through which the seemingly unrelated reactions to COVID-19 can be explained. The results might help to predict future behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic and to design measures to counteract the detrimental effects of the pandemic.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):823-37 [PMID: 14599247]
  3. Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 25;7:1583 [PMID: 27826261]
  4. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1239-51 [PMID: 19025281]
  5. Cogn Behav Therap. 2020 Jun 11;13:e19 [PMID: 34191938]
  6. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):720-729 [PMID: 33821088]
  7. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 May;14(2):155-95 [PMID: 20097885]
  8. Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):251-263 [PMID: 32436485]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):524-41 [PMID: 18729692]
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1291-301 [PMID: 22103578]
  11. Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):115-7 [PMID: 18832647]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):627-37 [PMID: 7965609]
  13. J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):279-317 [PMID: 33134595]
  14. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):525-37 [PMID: 16513804]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):133-47 [PMID: 20565191]
  16. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118 [PMID: 38602949]
  17. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;37(1):82-93 [PMID: 20956355]
  18. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Jun;186:1-11 [PMID: 36540059]

Grants

  1. W 1233/Austrian Science Fund FWF

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19threatdistaldefensesproximalresponsebehavioralinhibitionresultsconspiratorialbeliefsreactionsdefensepandemicincreasedperceivedsystemjustificationaroundusseveralways:controlPeopleseeminglyunrelated-responsesheightenedvigilanceassociatedpresentresearchstrategiescanexplainedhypothesizedieingroupmediatedStudy=entitativitycurrentsituationcoronavirusdisease2019portraysimposesuncertaintylackremindsmortalityworldreactedthreatsstockpilingyeasttoiletpaperfavoringnationalistideasendorsingAccordingconfrontationdiscrepantexperiencemakeshumansreactmanifestsleadsanxiousarousalseeklowerstateanxietyengagingproposemayrepresentthereforeforecastedmodelThusleadformreturnenhanceusebiasesoverlappingobservedeffecttestedtwopreregisteredstudies:1358showedrelatedturnhigherrestorationmotivationpassivepartysupport2348manipulatedsaliencefoundsuggestinghinttowardcommonmechanismmighthelppredictfuturebehaviordesignmeasurescounteractdetrimentaleffectsConspiracyBeliefsIngroupBiasSystemJustification:UseDefenseStrategiesCopeThreatBASBISconspiracyworldview

Similar Articles

Cited By (19)