Redundant trials can be prevented, if the EU clinical trial regulation is applied duly.

Daria Kim, Joerg Hasford
Author Information
  1. Daria Kim: Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Marstallplatz 1, 81545, Munich, Germany. daria.kim@ip.mpg.de. ORCID
  2. Joerg Hasford: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, The Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, and Chairman of the Permanent Working Party of Research Ethics Committees in Germany, Scharnitzerstaße 7, 82166, Gräfelfing, Germany.

Abstract

The problem of wasteful clinical trials has been debated relentlessly in the medical community. To a significant extent, it is attributed to redundant trials - studies that are carried out to address questions, which can be answered satisfactorily on the basis of existing knowledge and accessible evidence from prior research. This article presents the first evaluation of the potential of the EU Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, which entered into force in 2014 but is expected to become applicable at the end of 2021, to prevent such trials. Having reviewed provisions related to the trial authorisation, we propose how certain regulatory requirements for the assessment of trial applications can and should be interpreted and applied by national research ethics committees and other relevant authorities in order to avoid redundant trials and, most importantly, preclude the unnecessary recruitment of trial participants and their unjustified exposure to health risks.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65 [PMID: 24411644]
  2. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2005 Jul-Dec;(23):227-37 [PMID: 16628884]
  3. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Apr 25;4:161-164 [PMID: 29955660]
  4. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66 [PMID: 24411650]
  5. Stat Med. 2007 May 30;26(12):2479-500 [PMID: 16981184]
  6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:185-187 [PMID: 28188899]
  7. Int J Stroke. 2009 Feb;4(1):23-7 [PMID: 19236494]
  8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 25;13:50 [PMID: 23530582]
  9. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 30;6(6):e011666 [PMID: 27363818]
  10. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):154 [PMID: 30497417]
  11. Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):260-4 [PMID: 16279149]
  12. BMJ. 2018 Sep 12;362:k3218 [PMID: 30209058]
  13. Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):218-29; discussion 229-32 [PMID: 16279145]
  14. Reprod Health. 2018 May 15;15(1):79 [PMID: 29764443]
  15. JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32 [PMID: 14506122]
  16. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76 [PMID: 24411647]
  17. BMJ. 1997 Mar 1;314(7081):676 [PMID: 9066489]
  18. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141-5 [PMID: 3600702]
  19. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Jun;62(6):682-689 [PMID: 31049626]
  20. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):830-835 [PMID: 28638934]
  21. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;63(9):983-91 [PMID: 20573483]
  22. Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514 [PMID: 27620683]
  23. BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1390-3 [PMID: 8956711]
  24. Lancet. 2015 Oct 17;386(10003):1536 [PMID: 26530621]
  25. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91 [PMID: 25558501]
  26. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 12;295(6599):654-6 [PMID: 3117277]
  27. BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1215-8 [PMID: 8634569]
  28. Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:2 [PMID: 29062491]
  29. PLoS Med. 2010 Sep 21;7(9):e1000326 [PMID: 20877712]
  30. Trials. 2014 Jul 16;15:286 [PMID: 25027292]
  31. Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):193-6 [PMID: 23732270]
  32. Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2037-40 [PMID: 10885355]
  33. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75 [PMID: 24411645]
  34. J Med Ethics. 1993 Dec;19(4):211, 218 [PMID: 8308875]
  35. Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 27;7(1):176 [PMID: 30368251]
  36. BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1189 [PMID: 11645050]
  37. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:61-70 [PMID: 27865900]
  38. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 24;5(8):e009460 [PMID: 26303335]
  39. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):50-5 [PMID: 21200038]
  40. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e102670 [PMID: 25068257]
  41. Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):20-1 [PMID: 20609983]
  42. BMJ. 2012 May 17;344:e3054 [PMID: 22611164]
  43. BMJ. 2013 Oct 29;347:f6104 [PMID: 24169943]
  44. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:20-25 [PMID: 29306063]
  45. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92 [PMID: 10861325]
  46. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;75(12):1659-1667 [PMID: 31435707]
  47. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):248-54 [PMID: 1614465]
  48. Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9 [PMID: 19525005]
  49. BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586 [PMID: 23303884]
  50. BMC Med. 2016 Jan 20;14:8 [PMID: 26792360]
  51. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):176-85 [PMID: 24411646]
  52. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017411 [PMID: 28827269]
  53. Lancet. 1993 Jul 24;342(8865):221-3 [PMID: 8100935]
  54. Biom J. 2014 Nov;56(6):973-90 [PMID: 25225031]
  55. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2 Suppl 2):1-14 [PMID: 15660473]
  56. PLoS Med. 2004 Nov;1(2):e35 [PMID: 15578106]
  57. Trials. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):365 [PMID: 29996869]
  58. PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 21;13(6):e1002049 [PMID: 27328301]
  59. BMJ. 2014 Aug 26;348:g5219 [PMID: 25161280]
  60. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1325-35 [PMID: 26186982]
  61. J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Oct;136(10):1930-1933 [PMID: 27664708]
  62. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4 [PMID: 24411643]
  63. BMJ. 2015 Mar 24;350:h809 [PMID: 25804210]
  64. J Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;13(3):181-182 [PMID: 32615030]
  65. BMC Med. 2015 Apr 14;13:82 [PMID: 25889502]
  66. Trials. 2017 May 15;18(1):219 [PMID: 28506284]
  67. JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2457-65 [PMID: 15161896]
  68. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1573-1586 [PMID: 26423180]
  69. BMC Med. 2016 Mar 29;14:59 [PMID: 27025849]
  70. Trials. 2015 Jun 05;16:261 [PMID: 26044814]
  71. BMC Med. 2015 Aug 12;13:187 [PMID: 26265226]
  72. Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):12-9 [PMID: 16276663]

MeSH Term

Ethics Committees, Research
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trialstrialclinicalcanEUethicsResearchredundantresearchClinicalauthorisationappliedcommitteesregulationTrialproblemwastefuldebatedrelentlesslymedicalcommunitysignificantextentattributed-studiescarriedaddressquestionsansweredsatisfactorilybasisexistingknowledgeaccessibleevidencepriorarticlepresentsfirstevaluationpotentialTrialsRegulation536/2014enteredforce2014expectedbecomeapplicableend2021preventreviewedprovisionsrelatedproposecertainregulatoryrequirementsassessmentapplicationsinterpretednationalrelevantauthoritiesorderavoidimportantlyprecludeunnecessaryrecruitmentparticipantsunjustifiedexposurehealthrisksRedundantpreventeddulyredundancySystematicreviewmethodology

Similar Articles

Cited By