Creation of a Novel Inflammation-Based Score for Operable Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Qian Huang, Yinghao Cao, Shouyi Wang, Rui Zhu
Author Information
  1. Qian Huang: Department of Pediatric, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
  2. Yinghao Cao: Department of Colorectal Surgery and Gastroenterology, Wuhan Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
  3. Shouyi Wang: Department of Pediatric, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
  4. Rui Zhu: Department of Pediatric, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

AIM: Systemic inflammation has been implicated in the progression of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated the prognostic ability of a comprehensive score based on several inflammatory indexes in operable CRC patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2013 and September 2017, this study retrospectively identified 1279 CRC patients receiving radical surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital and randomly assigned them into training (N=921) and validation (N=358) sets. A novel score, the CRC-specific inflammatory index (CSII), was developed from a series of inflammatory indexes significantly associated with survival in patients with CRC. This novel score was then divided into three categories and compared to the well-known systematic inflammatory index (SII) and TNM stage. Finally, a survival nomogram was generated by combining the CSII and other informative clinical features.
RESULTS: The CSII-OS was calculated as 1.110×lg ALRI + 1.082×CAR + 0.792×PI, while CSII-DFS was 1.709×lg ALRI + 1.033×CAR based on multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients with high CSII experienced a worse OS (HR=23.72, 95% CI, 11.30-49.78, P <0.001) and worse DFS (HR=15.62, 95% CI, 6.95-35.08, P <0.001) compared to those in CRC patients with low CSII. Moreover, ROC analyses showed that the CSII possessed excellent performance (AUC=0.859) in predicting OS and DFS. The AUC of the OS nomogram based on CSII, TNM stage, and chemotherapy was 0.897, while that of the DFS nomogram based on CSII, T stage, and TNM stage was 0.873. High-quality calibration curves in both OS and DFS nomograms were observed. Verification in the validation dataset showed results consistent with those in the training dataset.
CONCLUSION: The CSII is a CRC-specific prognostic score based on the combination of available inflammatory indexes. High CSII is a strong predictor of worse survival outcomes. The CSII also exhibits better predictive performance compared to SII or TNM stage in operable CRC patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Dis Markers. 2019 Jan 17;2019:6036979 [PMID: 30800188]
  2. Gastric Cancer. 2019 May;22(3):536-545 [PMID: 30377862]
  3. Gastric Cancer. 2020 May;23(3):540-549 [PMID: 32072387]
  4. Surgery. 2017 Oct;162(4):752-765 [PMID: 28688518]
  5. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164 [PMID: 32133645]
  6. J Transl Med. 2018 Oct 4;16(1):273 [PMID: 30286769]
  7. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16717 [PMID: 29196718]
  8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 06;13:33 [PMID: 23496923]
  9. Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8017 [PMID: 32415197]
  10. Clin Nutr. 2018 Aug;37(4):1279-1285 [PMID: 28566220]
  11. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:149185 [PMID: 24901008]
  12. Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1650-1659 [PMID: 29315503]
  13. Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:147-150 [PMID: 26836283]
  14. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Jun;86(6):309-13 [PMID: 24949322]
  15. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Apr;6(2):208-23 [PMID: 25830040]
  16. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):326-36 [PMID: 25575264]
  17. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(4):729-735 [PMID: 31290159]
  18. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 14;8(1):3044 [PMID: 29445100]
  19. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1067-1075 [PMID: 32179991]
  20. Cancer Lett. 2019 Feb 1;442:21-30 [PMID: 30392787]
  21. Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):436-44 [PMID: 18650914]
  22. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Aug 15;7(8):111-7 [PMID: 26306143]
  23. Hum Pathol. 2015 Feb;46(2):182-90 [PMID: 25522926]
  24. Immunity. 2019 Jul 16;51(1):15-26 [PMID: 31315033]
  25. Chin Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;8(5):46 [PMID: 31500429]
  26. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2101-2114.e5 [PMID: 20420949]
  27. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183115 [PMID: 30646224]
  28. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7252-9 [PMID: 15534099]
  29. World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 14;23(34):6261-6272 [PMID: 28974892]
  30. Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1292-1301 [PMID: 30303515]
  31. Br J Cancer. 2020 Aug;123(3):403-409 [PMID: 32424148]
  32. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jul;58:1-13 [PMID: 28602879]
  33. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Jun;42(6):1621-1626 [PMID: 28161825]
  34. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):e172319 [PMID: 28796857]
  35. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019 Apr;55:37-52 [PMID: 29775690]
  36. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Aug;35(8):1549-1555 [PMID: 32382837]
  37. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):6 [PMID: 32037496]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CSIIpatientsCRCinflammatorybasedstagescoresurvivalTNMnomogram1OSDFSindexesCRC-specificindexcompared+0worseinflammationcolorectalcancerprognosticoperabletrainingvalidationnovelSIIALRIPatients95%CIP<0001showedperformancedatasetAIM:SystemicimplicatedprogressionevaluatedabilitycomprehensiveseveralPATIENTSANDMETHODS:July2013September2017studyretrospectivelyidentified1279receivingradicalsurgeryWuhanUnionHospitalrandomlyassignedN=921N=358setsdevelopedseriessignificantlyassociateddividedthreecategorieswell-knownsystematicFinallygeneratedcombininginformativeclinicalfeaturesRESULTS:CSII-OScalculated110×lg082×CAR792×PICSII-DFS709×lg033×CARmultivariableCoxregressionanalysishighexperiencedHR=23721130-4978HR=1562695-3508lowMoreoverROCanalysespossessedexcellentAUC=0859predictingAUCchemotherapy897T873High-qualitycalibrationcurvesnomogramsobservedVerificationresultsconsistentCONCLUSION:combinationavailableHighstrongpredictoroutcomesalsoexhibitsbetterpredictiveCreationNovelInflammation-BasedScoreOperableColorectalCancerprognosissystemic

Similar Articles

Cited By