Keystone actors do not act alone: A business ecosystem perspective on sustainability in the global clothing industry.

Jacob Hileman, Ivan Kallstenius, Tiina Häyhä, Celinda Palm, Sarah Cornell
Author Information
  1. Jacob Hileman: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. ORCID
  2. Ivan Kallstenius: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. Tiina Häyhä: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  4. Celinda Palm: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  5. Sarah Cornell: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Global industries are typically dominated by a few disproportionately large and influential transnational corporations, or keystone actors. While concentration of economic production is not a new phenomenon, in an increasingly interconnected and globalized world, the scale of the impacts of keystone actors on diverse social-ecological systems continues to grow. In this article, we investigate how keystone actors in the global clothing industry engage in collaboration with a variety of other organizations to address nine interrelated biophysical and socioeconomic sustainability challenges. We expand on previous theoretical and empirical research by focusing on the larger business ecosystem in which keystone actors are embedded, and use network analysis to assess the contributions of different actor types to the architecture of the ecosystem. This systemic approach to the study of keystone actors and sustainability challenges highlights an important source of influence largely not addressed in previous research: the presence of organizations that occupy strategic positions around keystone actors. Such knowledge can help identify governance strategies for advancing industry-wide transformation towards sustainability.

References

  1. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 20;1(5):133 [PMID: 28812688]
  2. Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 02;5(10):eaax3324 [PMID: 31616789]
  3. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1138-43 [PMID: 26544141]
  4. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Oct;3(10):1396-1403 [PMID: 31527729]
  5. Nat Sustain. 2019 Jul 1;2(7):551-559 [PMID: 35342825]
  6. Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):1217 [PMID: 26068843]
  7. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;2(9):1352-1357 [PMID: 30104749]
  8. Harv Bus Rev. 2004 Mar;82(3):68-78, 126 [PMID: 15029791]
  9. Environ Res Lett. 2019 Aug 23;14(9):1-18 [PMID: 35340667]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):9038-9043 [PMID: 28784792]
  11. Harv Bus Rev. 1993 May-Jun;71(3):75-86 [PMID: 10126156]
  12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug;31(8):600-607 [PMID: 27312777]
  13. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25995 [PMID: 22046252]
  14. PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0127533 [PMID: 26017777]
  15. Sci Adv. 2018 Jun 06;4(6):eaar5237 [PMID: 29881777]

MeSH Term

Clothing
Commerce
Conservation of Natural Resources
Humans
Internationality
Socioeconomic Factors
Textile Industry

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0actorskeystonesustainabilityecosystemglobalclothingindustryorganizationschallengespreviousbusinessGlobalindustriestypicallydominateddisproportionatelylargeinfluentialtransnationalcorporationsconcentrationeconomicproductionnewphenomenonincreasinglyinterconnectedglobalizedworldscaleimpactsdiversesocial-ecologicalsystemscontinuesgrowarticleinvestigateengagecollaborationvarietyaddressnineinterrelatedbiophysicalsocioeconomicexpandtheoreticalempiricalresearchfocusinglargerembeddedusenetworkanalysisassesscontributionsdifferentactortypesarchitecturesystemicapproachstudyhighlightsimportantsourceinfluencelargelyaddressedresearch:presenceoccupystrategicpositionsaroundknowledgecanhelpidentifygovernancestrategiesadvancingindustry-widetransformationtowardsKeystoneactalone:perspective

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)