Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Injury Prevention Programs: A Qualitative Exploration and Model Development.

Anna B Newcomb, Mary Zadnik, Anthony R Carlini, Molly M Francis, Katherine P Frey, Sara E Heins, Leslie McNamara, Elena D Staguhn, Renan C Castillo
Author Information
  1. Anna B Newcomb: Trauma Services, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia (Dr Newcomb); Department of Occupational Therapy, University of St. Augustine, Austin, Texas (Dr Zadnik); Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Mr Carlini, Mss Francis and Staguhn, and Drs Frey and Castillo); RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Heins); and U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, District of Columbia (Ms McNamara).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma mandated implementation of injury prevention programs as a requirement for Level I and II trauma center designation. Little is known about the factors that facilitate or create barriers to establishing evidence-based injury prevention program implementation. The purpose of this research is to generate hypotheses regarding processes used to implement injury prevention programs at trauma centers, identify the factors that facilitate and serve as a barrier to implementation, and develop a model reflecting these factors and relationships.
METHODS: This is a qualitative study of injury prevention programs at trauma centers. Study participants were chosen from 24 sites representing trauma centers of different patient volumes, geographic regions, and settings in the United States. Subjects participated in phone interviews based on guides developed from pilot interviews with prevention coordinators. Transcribed interviews from eight subjects were analyzed using a system of member checking to code; analysis informed the identification of factors that influence the establishment of evidence-based injury prevention programs.
RESULTS: Five themes emerged from the data analysis: external factors, internal organizational factors, program capacity, program selection, and program success. Analysis revealed that successful program implementation was related to supportive leaders and collaborative, interdepartmental relationships. Additional themes indicated that while organizations were motivated primarily by verification requirements (external factor), strong institutional leadership (internal factor) was lacking. Employee readiness (program capacity) was hindered by limited training opportunities, and programs were often chosen (selection) based on implementation ease rather than evidence base or local data.
CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis reveals five emerging themes of program implementation; using these data, we suggest an initial model of barriers and facilitators for implementing evidence-based injury prevention programs that could serve as the springboard for additional research involving a larger representative sample.

References

  1. Aarons G. A., Horowitz J. D., Dlugosz L. R., Ehrhart M. G. (2012). The role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research. In Brownson R., Colditz G., Proctor E. (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 128–153). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. American Trauma Society. (2019). Trauma information exchange program. Retrieved October 17, 2019, from http://www.amtrauma.org/tiep/index.html
  3. American Trauma Society. (2014). Trauma Survivors Network. Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://www.traumasurvivorsnetwork.org/
  4. Berberoglu A. (2018). Impact of organizational climate on organizational commitment and perceived organizational performance: Empirical evidence from public hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 399. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3149-z
  5. Bradford A. N., Castillo R. C., Carlini A. R., Wegener S. T., Frattaroli S., Heins S. E., MacKenzie E. J. (2013). Barriers to implementation of a hospital-based program for survivors of traumatic injury. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 20(2), 89–99. doi:10.1097/JTN.0b013e3182960057
  6. Bradley E. H., Curry L. A., Devers K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1758–1772. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x
  7. Brockamp T., Koenen P., Mutschler M., Köhler M., Bouillon B., Schmucker U., Caspers M. (2018). Evaluating the impact of an injury prevention measure regarding different sociodemographic factors. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 10(1), 25–33. doi:10.5249/jivr.v10i1.952
  8. Brownson R. C., Colditz G. A., Proctor E. K. (2012). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Cirone J., Bendix P., An G. (2020). A system dynamics model of violent trauma and the role of violence intervention programs. Journal of Surgical Research, 247, 258–263. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.015
  10. Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. (2006). Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
  11. Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. (2014). Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2014. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons.
  12. Cornwell E. E., Chang D. C., Phillips J., Campbell K. A. (2003). Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: Effect on the process and outcome of care. Archives of Surgery, 138(8), 838–843. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.8.838
  13. Damschroder L. J., Lowery J. C. (2013). Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation Science, 8, 51. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-51
  14. Damschroder L. J., Aron D. C., Keith R. E., Kirsh S. R., Alexander J. A., Lowery J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  15. Eccles M. P., Mittman B. S. (2006). Welcome to Implementation Science. Implementation Science, 1, 1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
  16. Fixsen D. L., Naoom S. F., Blase K. A., Friedman R. M., Wallace F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature [PDF file]. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-MonographFull-01-2005.pdf
  17. Green L. W., Johnson J. L. (1996). Dissemination and utilization of health promotion and disease prevention knowledge: Theory, research and experience. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 87(Suppl. 2), S11–S17.
  18. Hasson H. (2010). Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Science, 5, 67. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-67
  19. Herie M., Martin G. W. (2002). Knowledge diffusion in social work: A new approach to bridging the gap. Social Work, 47(1), 85–95.
  20. Lezin N., McPhillips-Tangum C. (2017). Standards and indicators for model level I and II trauma center injury and violence prevention programs [PDF file]. Retrieved November 23, 2019, from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.safestates.org/resource/resmgr/Trauma_IVP/Trauma_IVP_Standards_&_Indic.pdf
  21. Martin G. W., Herie M. A., Turner B. J., Cunningham J. A. (1998). A social marketing model for disseminating research-based treatments to addictions treatment providers. Addiction, 93(11), 1703–1715.
  22. McDonald E. M., MacKenzie E. J., Teitelbaum S. D., Carlini A. R., Teter H., Valenziano C. P. (2007). Injury prevention activities in U.S. trauma centres: Are we doing enough? Injury, 38(5), 538–547. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.11.020
  23. Mesters I., Meertens R. M. (1999). Monitoring the dissemination of an educational protocol on pediatric asthma in family practice: A test of associations between dissemination variables. Health Education & Behavior, 26(1), 103–120. doi:10.1177/109019819902600109
  24. Moulding N. T., Silagy C. A., Weller D. P. (1999). A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Quality in Health Care, 8(3), 177–183. doi:10.1136/qshc.8.3.177
  25. National Center for Health Statistics. (2011). Health, United States, 2010: With Special feature on death and dying. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Information Design and Publishing.
  26. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2006). CDC injury fact book. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  27. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015). Baldridge excellence framework, criteria category and item commentary [PDF file]. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2017/04/28/2015_2016_Category_and_Item_Commentary_BNP.pdf
  28. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2019). The Baldridge performance excellence program. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.nist.gov/baldrige
  29. National Vital Statistics System, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. (2017). 10 leading causes of death by age group, United States [PDF file]. Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/leading_causes_of_death_by_age_group_2017-508.pdf
  30. Proctor E. K., Landsverk J., Aarons G., Chambers D., Glisson C., Mittman B. (2008). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24–34. doi:10.1007/s10488- 008-0197-4
  31. Richards L., Morse J. M. (2002). Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  32. Ritchie J., Lewis J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications.
  33. Rogers E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  34. Safe States Alliance. (2013). Building safer states: Core components of state public health injury and violence prevention programs. Retrieved October 13, 2019, from https://www.safestates.org/page/BuildingSaferStates
  35. Shackford S. R., Mackersie R. C., Hoyt D. B., Baxt W. G., Eastman A. B., Hammill F. N., Virgilio R. W. (1987). Impact of a trauma system on outcome of severely injured patients. Archives of Surgery, 122(5), 523–527. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400170029003
  36. Steckler A., Goodman R. M., McLeroy K. R., Davis S., Koch G. (1992). Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 6(3), 214–224. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-6.3.214
  37. Stewart B., Hollis S., Amato S. S., Bulger E., Mock C., Reynolds T. (2019). Trauma care and development assistance: Opportunities to reduce the burden of injury and strengthen health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97, 371–373. doi:10.2471/BLT.18.213074
  38. Tinkoff G. (2014, September). Trauma prevention coalition: Trauma Center Association of America Survey Summary. Philadelphia, PA: Inaugural Injury Prevention Coordinators Symposium and Summit.

MeSH Term

Humans
Preventive Health Services
Qualitative Research
Trauma Nursing
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0preventionprogramimplementationinjuryprogramsfactorstraumaevidence-basedcentersinterviewsthemesdatafacilitatebarriersresearchservemodelrelationshipschosenbasedusinganalysisexternalinternalcapacityselectionfactorBACKGROUND:2006AmericanCollegeSurgeonsCommitteeTraumamandatedrequirementLevelIIcenterdesignationLittleknowncreateestablishingpurposegeneratehypothesesregardingprocessesusedimplementidentifybarrierdevelopreflectingMETHODS:qualitativestudyStudyparticipants24sitesrepresentingdifferentpatientvolumesgeographicregionssettingsUnitedStatesSubjectsparticipatedphoneguidesdevelopedpilotcoordinatorsTranscribedeightsubjectsanalyzedsystemmembercheckingcodeinformedidentificationinfluenceestablishmentRESULTS:Fiveemergedanalysis:organizationalsuccessAnalysisrevealedsuccessfulrelatedsupportiveleaderscollaborativeinterdepartmentalAdditionalindicatedorganizationsmotivatedprimarilyverificationrequirementsstronginstitutionalleadershiplackingEmployeereadinesshinderedlimitedtrainingopportunitiesofteneaseratherevidencebaselocalCONCLUSIONS:DatarevealsfiveemergingsuggestinitialfacilitatorsimplementingspringboardadditionalinvolvinglargerrepresentativesampleBarriersFacilitatorsImplementationInjuryPreventionPrograms:QualitativeExplorationModelDevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By