The Dark Triad of personality and attitudes toward cognitive enhancement.

Eric Mayor, Maxime Daehne, Renzo Bianchi
Author Information
  1. Eric Mayor: Department of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, University of Basel, 4055, Basel, Switzerland. ericmarcel.mayor@unibas.ch. ORCID
  2. Maxime Daehne: Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
  3. Renzo Bianchi: Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive enhancement (CE) refers to the voluntary improvement of human cognitive capabilities. Few studies have examined the general attitude of the public towards CE. Such studies have suggested that the use of CE is considered largely unacceptable by the public. In parallel, past research indicates that individuals scoring high on the Dark Triad of personality (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) and competitiveness have atypical views of ethical questions. In this study, we examined (a) whether attitudes towards CE are associated with individual differences in the Dark Triad of personality as well as in trait and contextual competitiveness and (b) whether the Dark Triad moderates the effect of trait and contextual competitiveness on attitudes towards CE.
METHOD: US employees (N = 326) were recruited using Mechanical Turk. Participants completed a web survey. Data were analyzed by means of (robust) hierarchical regression and (robust) ANCOVAs.
RESULTS: The Dark Triad of personality and one of its subscales, Machiavellianism, predicted positive attitudes towards CE. Neither trait competitiveness nor contextual competitiveness were linked to general attitudes towards CE, but the DT was a positive moderator of the association between contextual competitiveness and positive attitudes.
CONCLUSION: Our findings extend the incipient knowledge about the factors relating to favourable views of CE by highlighting the role of dark personality traits in shaping such views. Our study further shows contextual factors can play a differentiated role with respect to such attitudes depending upon dark personality traits. Implications for policy-making are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Rep. 2004 Jun;94(3 Pt 1):883-7 [PMID: 15217044]
  2. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Nov;264 Suppl 1:S83-90 [PMID: 25214391]
  3. Addiction. 2010 Dec;105(12):2041-3 [PMID: 21054609]
  4. J Pers Assess. 2015;97(1):81-9 [PMID: 25157581]
  5. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32 [PMID: 20528068]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):1-31 [PMID: 20085404]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):28-36 [PMID: 21146447]
  8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):311-41 [PMID: 19543814]
  9. Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jul;25(5):588-602 [PMID: 25605749]
  10. Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1035-70 [PMID: 23088570]
  11. AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):54-56 [PMID: 31070558]
  12. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129805 [PMID: 26107846]
  13. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213619 [PMID: 30870469]
  14. Pharmacol Res. 2010 Sep;62(3):187-206 [PMID: 20416377]
  15. AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):35-47 [PMID: 31070552]
  16. Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Aug;58:104-112 [PMID: 29902691]
  17. Account Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):323-41 [PMID: 21916740]
  18. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Apr 17;8:53 [PMID: 24860438]
  19. Sci Technol Human Values. 2015 Sep;40(5):712-743 [PMID: 26336326]
  20. Ethics Behav. 2005;15(1):81-94 [PMID: 16127858]
  21. Scand J Public Health. 2008 Jul;36(5):532-7 [PMID: 18635734]
  22. AJOB Neurosci. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):51-53 [PMID: 31070563]
  23. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Mar 29;17:18 [PMID: 27025299]
  24. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0227818 [PMID: 32023288]
  25. Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:588-95 [PMID: 22732441]
  26. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Oct;15(10):1204-1211 [PMID: 30448283]
  27. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):3-24 [PMID: 26542339]
  28. Acad Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 24;: [PMID: 32974792]
  29. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e68821 [PMID: 23874778]
  30. Psychol Psychother. 2009 Jun;82(Pt 2):123-36 [PMID: 19040794]
  31. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):760-76 [PMID: 18295885]
  32. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5 [PMID: 26162106]
  33. Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;137(1):68-96 [PMID: 21219057]
  34. Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:529-43 [PMID: 22828638]
  35. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28416 [PMID: 22140584]
  36. Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):717-41 [PMID: 21859174]
  37. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Sep;38:40-62 [PMID: 32709551]
  38. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e71452 [PMID: 23940757]
  39. Eur J Psychol. 2018 Mar 12;14(1):28-43 [PMID: 29899796]

MeSH Term

Antisocial Personality Disorder
Attitude
Cognition
Competitive Behavior
Humans
Machiavellianism
Narcissism
Nootropic Agents

Chemicals

Nootropic Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CEattitudespersonalityDarkcompetitivenesstowardsTriadcontextualviewsenhancementtraitpositiveCognitivecognitivestudiesexaminedgeneralpublicMachiavellianismstudywhetherrobustfactorsroledarktraitsBACKGROUND:refersvoluntaryimprovementhumancapabilitiesattitudesuggesteduseconsideredlargelyunacceptableparallelpastresearchindicatesindividualsscoringhighnarcissismpsychopathyatypicalethicalquestionsassociatedindividualdifferenceswellbmoderateseffectMETHOD:USemployeesN = 326recruitedusingMechanicalTurkParticipantscompletedwebsurveyDataanalyzedmeanshierarchicalregressionANCOVAsRESULTS:onesubscalespredictedNeitherlinkedDTmoderatorassociationCONCLUSION:findingsextendincipientknowledgerelatingfavourablehighlightingshapingshowscanplaydifferentiatedrespectdependinguponImplicationspolicy-makingdiscussedtowardCompetitivenesstriadEthicalPublic

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)