The Psychometric Properties of the Prioritizing Positivity Scale.

Lahnna I Catalino, Aaron J Boulton
Author Information
  1. Lahnna I Catalino: Department of Psychology, Scripps College, Claremont, CA, USA.
  2. Aaron J Boulton: Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Abstract

The tendency to use pleasant states as a key criterion for how to structure daily life is called and has been measured with a 6-item scale. The Prioritizing Positivity Scale (PPS) is increasingly being used by researchers, but a comprehensive examination of its psychometric quality remains absent from the literature. Using three independent samples of adults (study 1:  = 176, study 2:  = 240, study 3:  = 226), we tested the scale's (1) factor structure, (2) reliability, (3) convergent and discriminant validity, and (4) measurement invariance. Results suggested that the 6th item was problematic (low factor loading, conceptually distinct from other items) and when removed, a single-factor structure was appropriate. The revised 5-item PPS demonstrated satisfactory reliability, construct validity and measurement invariance. The revised 5-item PPS offers a brief and valid way to measure a personality difference shown to predict well-being.

References

  1. J Pers. 2001 Apr;69(2):323-61 [PMID: 11339802]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1332-50 [PMID: 21843012]
  3. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  4. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):349-61 [PMID: 8636887]
  5. Trends Neurosci. 2003 Sep;26(9):507-13 [PMID: 12948663]
  6. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 [PMID: 11280420]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):365-76 [PMID: 12585810]
  8. Emotion. 2020 Dec;20(8):1332-1343 [PMID: 31613133]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 May;82(5):804-18 [PMID: 12003479]
  10. Qual Life Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):411-420 [PMID: 30255375]
  11. Emotion. 2014 Dec;14(6):1155-61 [PMID: 25401290]
  12. Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433 [PMID: 28557467]
  13. J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271-324 [PMID: 15016066]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35 [PMID: 8636885]
  15. Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):807-15 [PMID: 21517168]
  16. J Res Pers. 2016 Feb 1;60:46-50 [PMID: 26778865]
  17. Mindfulness (N Y). 2017 Dec;8(6):1623-1633 [PMID: 29201247]
  18. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;167(1):99-103 [PMID: 7551619]
  19. Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):708-728 [PMID: 29172611]
  20. Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248 [PMID: 20640194]

Grants

  1. R01 AT007884/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. R01 CA170128/NCI NIH HHS
  3. R01 NR012899/NINR NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Emotions
Humans
Personality Disorders
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0structurePPSstudyPrioritizingPositivityScalefactorreliabilityvaliditymeasurementinvariancerevised5-itemtendencyusepleasantstateskeycriteriondailylifecalledmeasured6-itemscaleincreasinglyusedresearcherscomprehensiveexaminationpsychometricqualityremainsabsentliteratureUsingthreeindependentsamplesadults1: = 1762: = 2403: = 226testedscale's123convergentdiscriminant4Resultssuggested6thitemproblematiclowloadingconceptuallydistinctitemsremovedsingle-factorappropriatedemonstratedsatisfactoryconstructoffersbriefvalidwaymeasurepersonalitydifferenceshownpredictwell-beingPsychometricProperties

Similar Articles

Cited By