Indoor tanning exposure in association with multiple primary melanoma.

Lilit Karapetyan, Xi Yang, Hong Wang, Cindy A Sander, Ashley Moyer, Melissa Wilson, Arivarasan Karunamurthy, John M Kirkwood
Author Information
  1. Lilit Karapetyan: Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. ORCID
  2. Xi Yang: Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  3. Hong Wang: Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  4. Cindy A Sander: Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  5. Ashley Moyer: Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  6. Melissa Wilson: Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  7. Arivarasan Karunamurthy: Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  8. John M Kirkwood: Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk for subsequent new primary melanomas. Indoor tanning is a recognized risk factor for melanoma. This study was aimed at determining the association between indoor tanning and the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of cases with multiple primary melanoma and sex-matched controls with single primary melanoma retrieved at a 1:2 ratio from the Biological Sample and Nevus Bank of the Melanoma Center of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between multiple primary melanoma and risk factors.
RESULTS: In total, 330 patients (39.1% men) with a median age of 51 years were enrolled. Compared with patients who had a single primary melanoma, patients with multiple melanomas were younger at the diagnosis of their first primary melanoma and were more likely to be discovered at stage 0 or I and to have had indoor tanning exposure, a family history of melanoma, atypical moles, dysplastic nevi, and a Breslow thickness less than 1 mm. Compared with patients' first melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more likely to be thinner or in situ. The estimated probability of the locus for the second primary being the same as that for the first primary melanoma was 34%. In a multivariate analysis after adjustments for age, a family history of melanoma, the presence of atypical and dysplastic nevi, and recreational sun exposure, indoor tanning remained significantly associated with the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.08; P = .0356).
CONCLUSIONS: Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of second primary melanoma. Subsequent melanomas are more likely to be thin or in situ and to occur in different anatomic locations.

Keywords

References

  1. J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Feb;131(2):461-7 [PMID: 20944647]
  2. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Mar;139(3):665-672 [PMID: 30367874]
  3. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Oct;73(4):630-6 [PMID: 26298295]
  4. Melanoma Res. 2017 Dec;27(6):638-640 [PMID: 29076952]
  5. BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 04;18(1):1096 [PMID: 30285702]
  6. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Jan 14;3:139-44 [PMID: 27419006]
  7. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S86-S94 [PMID: 28818251]
  8. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Jun;151(6):607-15 [PMID: 25671687]
  9. BMJ. 2012 Jul 24;345:e4757 [PMID: 22833605]
  10. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Feb 1;155(2):188-195 [PMID: 30566178]
  11. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):265-72 [PMID: 20231496]
  12. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 May;150(5):512-21 [PMID: 24500373]
  13. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1191-1193 [PMID: 28522044]
  14. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Mar;14(3):562-6 [PMID: 15767329]
  15. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May;72(5):794-800 [PMID: 25769192]
  16. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30 [PMID: 31912902]
  17. Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;118(17):4184-92 [PMID: 22246969]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546 [PMID: 31562797]
  19. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Dec;79(6):1101-1108 [PMID: 30009864]
  20. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jun;19(6):1557-68 [PMID: 20507845]
  21. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Aug;15(8):1520-5 [PMID: 16896043]
  22. Cancer Res. 1988 Feb 15;48(4):1016-8 [PMID: 3338073]
  23. Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1148-1157 [PMID: 31520533]
  24. Arch Dermatol. 2006 Apr;142(4):433-8 [PMID: 16618861]
  25. Int J Cancer. 2011 May 15;128(10):2425-35 [PMID: 20669232]
  26. JAMA. 2005 Oct 5;294(13):1647-54 [PMID: 16204664]
  27. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):472-492 [PMID: 29028110]
  28. Melanoma Res. 1998 Aug;8(4):361-6 [PMID: 9764812]

Grants

  1. P30 CA047904/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Case-Control Studies
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Melanoma
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced
Nevus, Pigmented
Risk Factors
Skin
Skin Neoplasms
Sunbathing
Tanning
Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0melanomaprimarytanningmultiplemelanomasriskindoorexposureIndoorassociationpatientsfirstlikelyincreasedsubsequentstudyoccurrencesingleratioageComparedfamilyhistoryatypicaldysplasticnevi1situsecondassociatedBACKGROUND:PatientscutaneousnewrecognizedfactoraimeddeterminingMETHODS:retrospectivecase-controlcasessex-matchedcontrolsretrieved1:2BiologicalSampleNevusBankMelanomaCenterUniversityPittsburghCancerInstituteLogisticregressionmodelsusedexaminefactorsRESULTS:total330391%menmedian51yearsenrolledyoungerdiagnosisdiscoveredstage0molesBreslowthicknesslessmmpatients'thinnerestimatedprobabilitylocus34%multivariateanalysisadjustmentspresencerecreationalsunremainedsignificantlyodds27595%confidenceinterval07-708P=0356CONCLUSIONS:Subsequentthinoccurdifferentanatomiclocations

Similar Articles

Cited By