Perceived Value of Electronic Medical Records in Community Health Services: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Workers in Mainland China.

Zining Xia, WenJuan Gao, Xuejuan Wei, Yingchun Peng, Hongjun Ran, Hao Wu, Chaojie Liu
Author Information
  1. Zining Xia: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  2. WenJuan Gao: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  3. Xuejuan Wei: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  4. Yingchun Peng: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  5. Hongjun Ran: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  6. Hao Wu: Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China.
  7. Chaojie Liu: School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree to which electronic medical records (EMRs) were used in primary care and the value of EMRs as perceived by primary care workers in China.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 2719 physicians ( = 2213) and nurses ( = 506) selected from 462 community health centres across all regions of mainland China except for Tibet. Regional differences in the responses regarding the functionality of existing EMR systems and the perceived value of EMRs were examined using Chi-square tests and ordinal regression analyses.
RESULTS: Less than 59% of the community health centres had adopted EMRs. More than 89% of the respondents believed that it was necessary to adopt EMRs in primary care. Of the existing EMR systems, 50% had access to telehealth support for laboratory, imaging or patient consultation services. Only 38.4% captured data that met all task needs and 35.4% supported referral arrangements. "Management of chronic conditions" was voted (66%) as the top preferred feature of EMRs. Higher levels of recognition of the value of EMRs were found in the relatively more developed eastern region compared with their counterparts in other regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid EMR adoption in primary care is evident in mainland China. The low level of functionality in data acquisition and referral arrangements runs counter to the requirements for "management of chronic conditions", the most preferred feature of EMRs in primary care. Regional disparities in the realised value of EMRs in primary care deserve policy attention.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):857-67 [PMID: 26238705]
  2. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Aug;92:8-14 [PMID: 27318067]
  3. N C Med J. 2015 Nov-Dec;76(5):280-5 [PMID: 26946855]
  4. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):91-8 [PMID: 21134976]
  5. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:763-771 [PMID: 28269872]
  6. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):587-90 [PMID: 24821739]
  7. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:246-54 [PMID: 27573333]
  8. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2104-12 [PMID: 26643631]
  9. Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 28;9:105 [PMID: 25163794]
  10. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):341-8 [PMID: 19130148]
  11. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 16;16:1 [PMID: 29371833]
  12. Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Oct;26(5):402-409 [PMID: 32513381]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60 [PMID: 18565855]
  14. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1019-24 [PMID: 26659415]
  15. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 May;26(1):0 [PMID: 31142493]
  16. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):821 [PMID: 30373577]
  17. Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12):1037-41 [PMID: 25304020]
  18. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):125-30 [PMID: 21292704]
  19. Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jan;78(1):22-31 [PMID: 18644745]
  20. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;26(2):245-51, ix [PMID: 25771280]
  21. Health Informatics J. 2017 Apr 1;:1460458217704244 [PMID: 28434279]
  22. JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Sep 18;3(3):e30 [PMID: 26385598]
  23. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):15-33 [PMID: 29320797]
  24. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55 [PMID: 22312227]
  25. Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1 Pt 2):392-404 [PMID: 24359580]
  26. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014 Jan;39(1):15-32 [PMID: 24131449]
  27. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2805-16 [PMID: 23154997]
  28. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;114(1):1-2 [PMID: 25455262]
  29. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):101 [PMID: 30424758]
  30. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Nov 01;12:1f [PMID: 26604875]
  31. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):28-36 [PMID: 20011805]
  32. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010 [PMID: 23687482]
  33. CMAJ. 2015 Jan 6;187(1):E17-E18 [PMID: 25487665]
  34. Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Sep;23(4):i-ii [PMID: 29229032]
  35. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):764-71 [PMID: 24431335]
  36. CMAJ. 2019 Jan 14;191(2):E28-E29 [PMID: 30642821]
  37. Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):683-9 [PMID: 22727614]
  38. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1478-85 [PMID: 23840052]
  39. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 04;14:370 [PMID: 25190184]
  40. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):992-995 [PMID: 28419267]
  41. Health Justice. 2019 Dec 12;7(1):18 [PMID: 31832790]
  42. Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210 Suppl 6:S12-S16 [PMID: 30927466]

MeSH Term

China
Community Health Services
Community Health Workers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electronic Health Records
Female
Humans
Male
Perception
Primary Health Care
Tibet

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EMRsprimarycareChinavalueEMRelectronicmedicalperceived=communityhealthcentresregionsmainlandRegionalfunctionalityexistingsystems4%datareferralarrangementschronicconditions"preferredfeatureOBJECTIVE:evaluatedegreerecordsusedworkersMETHODS:cross-sectionalsurveyconducted2719physicians2213nurses506selected462acrossexceptTibetdifferencesresponsesregardingexaminedusingChi-squaretestsordinalregressionanalysesRESULTS:Less59%adopted89%respondentsbelievednecessaryadopt50%accesstelehealthsupportlaboratoryimagingpatientconsultationservices38capturedmettaskneeds35supported"Managementvoted66%topHigherlevelsrecognitionfoundrelativelydevelopedeasternregioncomparedcounterpartsCONCLUSIONS:Rapidadoptionevidentlowlevelacquisitionrunscounterrequirements"managementdisparitiesrealiseddeservepolicyattentionPerceivedValueElectronicMedicalRecordsCommunityHealthServices:NationalCross-SectionalSurveyPrimaryCareWorkersMainlandrecord

Similar Articles

Cited By