Interaction and Emotional Connection with Pets: A Descriptive Analysis from Puerto Rico.

Ursula Aragunde-Kohl, José Gómez-Galán, Cristina Lázaro-Pérez, José Ángel Martínez-López
Author Information
  1. Ursula Aragunde-Kohl: Department of Psychology, Ana G. Méndez University, Gurabo Campus, Gurabo, PR 00777, USA.
  2. José Gómez-Galán: Department of Education, University of Extremadura, Avda, de Elvas, s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain. ORCID
  3. Cristina Lázaro-Pérez: Department of Sociology, University of Murcia, C/Campus Universitario, 11, 30100 Murcia, Spain. ORCID
  4. José Ángel Martínez-López: Department of Social Work and Social Services, University of Murcia, Avda, Teniente Flomesta, 5, 30003 Murcia, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

The study of human-animal interactions has become a prominent research field. The presence of pets in our daily lives has meant a change in the perception of our relationship with pets. One of the new lines of research that has opened up in this area analyzes the possible physical, emotional, and psychological benefits of a human-animal bond. In this context, two main objectives were pursued in this study, whose sample ( = 1436) was investigated in Puerto Rico: (PO1) determining the characteristics of the owners and the care of the pets within Puerto Rican society and (PO2) to analyzing the benefits of living with pets for health and personal well-being, especially at the psychological level. We sought to identify the feelings that arose in pet caretakers as a result of human-animal interactions. The methodology used, which was descriptive and not experimental, was based on a questionnaire of 86 questions with a Likert scale. After the descriptive analysis was undertaken through a frequency analysis, a binary logistic regression was carried out to establish whether the feelings and emotions of the subjects toward their companion pets were determined by sociodemographic variables and were related to the type of coexistence with their pets. The two main results from this study are as follows: for most owners, their pets are very important beings, and those who establish an emotional connection with their pets experience love, joy, and peace. Pets are part of human life through very intense relationships and interactions that, in most cases, increase personal welfare by providing improvements to the human-animal biopsychosocial system. In this sense, a relationship with a pet has a positive impact on the mental health of the owner. Pets are a part of our family lives and are regulators of the most elementary feelings and emotions in humans.

Keywords

References

  1. Animals (Basel). 2017 Feb 01;7(2): [PMID: 28157145]
  2. Behav Sci Law. 2018 Nov;36(6):717-729 [PMID: 30207616]
  3. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2009 Oct;21(4):307-24 [PMID: 20183137]
  4. Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 06;9(9): [PMID: 31500203]
  5. Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Jan;37(1):67-80 [PMID: 25601065]
  6. Headache. 1994 Oct;34(9):542-3 [PMID: 8002331]
  7. J Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul;73(7):761-784 [PMID: 27809353]
  8. Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 18;7:44 [PMID: 32133375]
  9. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2016 Jul-Aug;51(4):210-6 [PMID: 26857084]
  10. Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 29;9(9): [PMID: 31470656]
  11. Psychogeriatrics. 2012 Sep;12(3):143-50 [PMID: 22994611]
  12. Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Mar;38(3):533-43 [PMID: 24268376]
  13. Res Vet Sci. 2017 Oct;114:18-26 [PMID: 28279899]
  14. Psychogeriatrics. 2011 Jun;11(2):125-9 [PMID: 21707862]
  15. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014;2014:623203 [PMID: 25477957]
  16. Nursing. 2012 Oct;42(10):54-8 [PMID: 23014288]
  17. US Army Med Dep J. 2012 Apr-Jun;:38-45 [PMID: 22388679]
  18. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2011;47(4):397-408 [PMID: 22194075]
  19. Animals (Basel). 2015 Jun 12;5(2):426-41 [PMID: 26479243]
  20. Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1158-1161 [PMID: 32093954]
  21. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Feb;25(1):37-45 [PMID: 19075298]
  22. ILAR J. 2010;51(3):199-207 [PMID: 21131720]
  23. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):526-34 [PMID: 26152446]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 27;14(3): [PMID: 28264460]
  25. Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 29;10(5): [PMID: 32365588]
  26. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Jan;47(1):47-59 [PMID: 31456130]
  27. Hum Anim Interact Bull. 2013;1(1):20-37 [PMID: 25685855]
  28. Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 12;9(9): [PMID: 31547246]
  29. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 29;16(19): [PMID: 31569460]
  30. Occup Ther Health Care. 1998;11(2):27-43 [PMID: 23944219]
  31. Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 25;9(9): [PMID: 31450716]
  32. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):289-295 [PMID: 28443682]
  33. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0194731 [PMID: 29617398]
  34. Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 05;10(6): [PMID: 32517010]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0petshuman-animalstudyinteractionspsychologicalPuertohealthfeelingsresearchlivesrelationshipemotionalbenefitsbondtwomainownerspersonalpetdescriptiveanalysisestablishemotionscompanionPetspartwelfarehuman–animalbecomeprominentfieldpresencedailymeantchangeperceptionOnenewlinesopenedareaanalyzespossiblephysicalcontextobjectivespursuedwhosesample=1436investigatedRico:PO1determiningcharacteristicscarewithinRicansocietyPO2analyzinglivingwell-beingespeciallylevelsoughtidentifyarosecaretakersresultmethodologyusedexperimentalbasedquestionnaire86questionsLikertscaleundertakenfrequencybinarylogisticregressioncarriedwhethersubjectstowarddeterminedsociodemographicvariablesrelatedtypecoexistenceresultsfollows:importantbeingsconnectionexperiencelovejoypeacehumanlifeintenserelationshipscasesincreaseprovidingimprovementsbiopsychosocialsystemsensepositiveimpactmentalownerfamilyregulatorselementaryhumansInteractionEmotionalConnectionPets:DescriptiveAnalysisRicoanimalprotectionanimal-assistedinterventioneducationinteraction

Similar Articles

Cited By