Content Validation of an Instrument for the Assessment of School Teachers' Levels of Knowledge of Diabetes through Expert Judgment.

Trinidad Luque-Vara, Marta Linares-Manrique, Elisabet Fernández-Gómez, Adelina Martín-Salvador, María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda, Carmen Enrique-Mirón
Author Information
  1. Trinidad Luque-Vara: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain. ORCID
  2. Marta Linares-Manrique: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain.
  3. Elisabet Fernández-Gómez: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain. ORCID
  4. Adelina Martín-Salvador: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain. ORCID
  5. María Angustias Sánchez-Ojeda: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain. ORCID
  6. Carmen Enrique-Mirón: HUM-613 Research Group, Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Melilla Campus, University of Granada, Calle Santander s/n, 52001 Melilla, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the content validation, through expert judgment, of a questionnaire for determining the level of knowledge that school teachers have of diabetes in order to design relevant educational interventions to improve the health of school-aged children. This psychometric study involved 15 experts who assessed each of the items in the instrument. The results revealed that the strength of agreement shown by the questionnaire ranged from substantial to almost perfect in its four dimensions, with the characteristics of "sufficiency" and "relevance" having the highest scores (0.982 and 0.903, respectively) based on the judgments made by the participating experts. Regarding statistical significance, the characteristics "sufficiency", with < 0.001, and "relevance", with = 0.001, were particularly relevant. The overall degree of understandability for the new version of the instrument was high (91.54%). The psychometric results obtained from validation of the "grado de conocimientos sobre diabetes en docentes del ámbito escolar" (Spanish for "level of knowledge of diabetes in school teachers")-GCDDaE questionnaire through expert judgment and the pre-test indicate that it is recommended for use as it is both relevant and quick and easy to administer.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 18;12(4): [PMID: 32325669]
  2. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Sep;13(6):e6-13 [PMID: 21595805]
  3. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012 Dec;4(4):199-203 [PMID: 23032146]
  4. Reumatol Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;5(4):171-7 [PMID: 21794604]
  5. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843 [PMID: 31518657]
  6. An Pediatr (Barc). 2014 Sep;81(3):189.e1-189.e12 [PMID: 24467823]
  7. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jan;24(1):16-21 [PMID: 11194219]
  8. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;143:140-145 [PMID: 30006308]
  9. J Sch Health. 2017 May;87(5):363-375 [PMID: 28382666]
  10. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;159:107952 [PMID: 31805351]
  11. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Feb;12(1):63-70 [PMID: 20546162]
  12. Diabetes Educ. 1984 Winter;9(4):11-4 [PMID: 6559683]
  13. J Sch Nurs. 2011 Jun;27(3):171-84 [PMID: 21189306]
  14. J Nurs Res. 2013 Dec;21(4):235-43 [PMID: 24241272]
  15. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82 [PMID: 23092060]
  16. J Sch Nurs. 2006 Feb;22(1):53-8 [PMID: 16435931]
  17. J Sch Nurs. 2009 Feb;25(1):55-61 [PMID: 19197019]
  18. West J Nurs Res. 2003 Aug;25(5):508-18 [PMID: 12955968]
  19. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64 [PMID: 17535316]
  20. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Jan;70(1):45-52 [PMID: 19174119]
  21. Salud Publica Mex. 2002 Sep-Oct;44(5):448-63 [PMID: 12389489]
  22. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2011 Jan-Apr;34(1):63-72 [PMID: 21532647]
  23. J Sch Nurs. 2013 Feb;29(1):31-8 [PMID: 22554899]
  24. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2013;36(1-2):98-119 [PMID: 23597278]
  25. Rev Med Chil. 2008 Jan;136(1):125-30 [PMID: 18483663]
  26. Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct;38(10):1958-63 [PMID: 26404925]
  27. J Sch Nurs. 2008 Apr;24(2):95-102 [PMID: 18363445]
  28. Aten Primaria. 2001 Jul-Aug;28(3):201-9 [PMID: 11459528]
  29. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:126 [PMID: 28270777]
  30. Aten Primaria. 2013 Dec;45(10):514-21 [PMID: 23891031]
  31. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Feb 27;18:eAO5101 [PMID: 32130327]
  32. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  33. Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):1987-1995 [PMID: 27493134]
  34. School Nurse News. 2005 Nov;22(5):16-20 [PMID: 16381430]

MeSH Term

Adult
Child
Diabetes Mellitus
Educational Measurement
Humans
Judgment
Knowledge
Reproducibility of Results
School Teachers
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0questionnairediabetes0expertjudgmentrelevantstudycontentvalidationknowledgeschoolpsychometricexpertsinstrumentresultscharacteristics"sufficiency""relevance"001objectivedescribedetermininglevelteachersorderdesigneducationalinterventionsimprovehealthschool-agedchildreninvolved15assesseditemsrevealedstrengthagreementshownrangedsubstantialalmostperfectfourdimensionshighestscores982903respectivelybasedjudgmentsmadeparticipatingRegardingstatisticalsignificance<=particularlyoveralldegreeunderstandabilitynewversionhigh9154%obtained"gradodeconocimientossobreendocentesdelámbitoescolar"Spanish"levelteachers"-GCDDaEpre-testindicaterecommendedusequickeasyadministerContentValidationInstrumentAssessmentSchoolTeachers'LevelsKnowledgeDiabetesExpertJudgmentFleiss’κvalidityschoolstype1

Similar Articles

Cited By