Diphtheria Antitoxin Administration, Outcomes, and Safety: Response to a Diphtheria Outbreak in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.

Nell Eisenberg, Isabella Panunzi, Anja Wolz, Chiara Burzio, Anna Cilliers, Md Ariful Islam, Waqar Mohammad Noor, Oren Jalon, Deanna Jannat-Khah, Julita Gil Cuesta
Author Information
  1. Nell Eisenberg: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  2. Isabella Panunzi: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  3. Anja Wolz: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Chiara Burzio: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  5. Anna Cilliers: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  6. Md Ariful Islam: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  7. Waqar Mohammad Noor: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  8. Oren Jalon: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Deanna Jannat-Khah: Division of Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  10. Julita Gil Cuesta: Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Center Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diphtheria has re-emerged over the past several years. There is a paucity of data on the administration and safety of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT), the standard treatment for diphtheria. The 2017-2018 outbreak among Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh was the largest in decades. We determined the outcomes of DAT-treated patients and describe the occurrence and risk factors associated with adverse reactions to DAT.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at the Médecins Sans Frontières Rubber Garden Diphtheria Treatment Center from December 2017-September 2018. Diphtheria was diagnosed based on the World Health Organization clinical case criteria. High-acuity patients were eligible for DAT. Safety precautions were meticulously maintained. We calculated the presence of adverse events by age, duration of illness, and DAT dosage using bivariate comparisons.
RESULTS: We treated 709 patients with DAT; 98% (n = 696) recovered and were discharged. One-fourth (n = 170) had at least 1 adverse reaction. Common reactions included cough (n = 115, 16%), rash (n = 66, 9%), and itching (n = 37, 5%). Three percent (n = 18) had severe hypersensitivity reactions. Five patients died during their DAT infusion or soon afterwards, but no deaths were attributed to DAT.
CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for DAT-treated patients were excellent; mortality was <1%. Adverse reactions occurred in one-quarter of all patients, but most reactions were mild and resolved quickly. DAT can be safely administered in a setting with basic critical care, provided there is continuous patient monitoring during the infusion, staff training on management of adverse effects, and attention to safety precautions.

Keywords

References

  1. Toxicon. 1998 Jun;36(6):823-46 [PMID: 9663690]
  2. N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 12;326(11):773-7 [PMID: 1738395]
  3. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;68:39-43 [PMID: 29329951]
  4. Vaccine. 2016 Aug 5;34(36):4321-6 [PMID: 27422343]
  5. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;71:122-123 [PMID: 29871739]
  6. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;47(4):373-80 [PMID: 16546624]
  7. Euro Surveill. 2014 Jun 19;19(24): [PMID: 24970373]
  8. J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;181 Suppl 1:S130-7 [PMID: 10657204]
  9. J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;181 Suppl 1:S2-9 [PMID: 10657184]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(1):89-97 [PMID: 31425581]
  11. Infect Immun. 2013 Nov;81(11):3992-4000 [PMID: 23940209]
  12. Confl Health. 2019 May 22;13:19 [PMID: 31139250]
  13. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Oct;38(4):292-9 [PMID: 26758220]
  14. J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;181 Suppl 1:S110-5 [PMID: 10657201]
  15. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S161-81 [PMID: 20176258]
  16. Vaccine. 2009 Dec 10;28(1):14-20 [PMID: 19818425]

MeSH Term

Bangladesh
Diphtheria
Diphtheria Antitoxin
Disease Outbreaks
Humans
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Diphtheria Antitoxin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DATpatientsreactionsDiphtheriaadversediphtheriasafetyBangladeshDAT-treatedprecautionsinfusionOutcomeseffectsBACKGROUND:re-emergedpastseveralyearspaucitydataadministrationantitoxinstandardtreatment2017-2018outbreakamongRohingyarefugeeslargestdecadesdeterminedoutcomesdescribeoccurrenceriskfactorsassociatedMETHODS:conductedretrospectivestudyMédecinsSansFrontièresRubberGardenTreatmentCenterDecember2017-September2018diagnosedbasedWorldHealthOrganizationclinicalcasecriteriaHigh-acuityeligibleSafetymeticulouslymaintainedcalculatedpresenceeventsagedurationillnessdosageusingbivariatecomparisonsRESULTS:treated70998%n = 696recovereddischargedOne-fourthn = 170least1reactionCommonincludedcoughn = 11516%rashn = 669%itchingn = 375%Threepercentn = 18severehypersensitivityFivediedsoonafterwardsdeathsattributedCONCLUSIONS:excellentmortality<1%Adverseoccurredone-quartermildresolvedquicklycansafelyadministeredsettingbasiccriticalcareprovidedcontinuouspatientmonitoringstafftrainingmanagementattentionAntitoxinAdministrationSafety:ResponseOutbreakCox'sBazarangladeshantitoxinsdiseaseoutbreaksdrug-relatedside

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)