Moral reasoning, moral decision-making, and empathy in Korsakoff's syndrome.

Erik Oudman, Sioux van Stigt Thans, Estrella R Montoya, Albert Postma
Author Information
  1. Erik Oudman: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Sioux van Stigt Thans: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  3. Estrella R Montoya: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  4. Albert Postma: Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Korsakoff's syndrome (KS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder, caused by a vitamin B1 deficiency. Although it is known that patients with KS display diminished theory of mind functioning and frequently exhibit marked antisocial interactions little attention has so far focused on the integrity of moral decision-making abilities, moral reasoning, and empathy. In an experimental cross-sectional design, 20 patients diagnosed with KS, and twenty age-, education-, and gender-equivalent healthy participants performed tests assessing moral decision-making, moral reasoning maturity, empathy, and executive functioning. Participants were administered the Moral Behaviour Inventory (MBI) for everyday moral dilemmas, and ten cartoons of abstract moral dilemmas. Responses were scored according to the Kohlberg stages of moral reasoning. Empathy and executive functioning were assessed with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). In contrast to frontal traumatic brain injury patients, KS patients did not display a utilitarian bias, suggesting preserved moral decision-making abilities. Of interest, KS patients had significantly lower levels of moral reasoning maturity on everyday moral dilemmas, and abstract moral dilemmas. In patients, empathy was moderately related to the level of moral maturity on both tasks, while executive functioning was not. In conclusion, KS patients have preserved moral decision-making abilities, but their moral reasoning abilities are poorer in everyday and abstract situations. Lower moral reasoning abilities and lower levels of empathy together may be responsible for adverse social functioning in KS.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8 [PMID: 11557895]
  2. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39882 [PMID: 22761922]
  3. Soc Neurosci. 2014 Feb;9(1):94-107 [PMID: 24359489]
  4. Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400 [PMID: 15473975]
  5. Nature. 2007 Apr 19;446(7138):908-11 [PMID: 17377536]
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164374 [PMID: 27723826]
  7. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(5):501-8 [PMID: 23656524]
  8. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):148-54 [PMID: 19151162]
  9. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2011 Dec;23(6):302-8 [PMID: 25380042]
  10. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Mar;5(1):59-67 [PMID: 20053752]
  11. Brain Inj. 2019;33(1):32-39 [PMID: 30325212]
  12. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Mar;19(3):240-247 [PMID: 29079031]
  13. Alcohol Alcohol. 2019 Jan 1;54(1):23-29 [PMID: 30407502]
  14. AJOB Neurosci. 2015;6(3):3-14 [PMID: 26877887]
  15. J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 9;35(36):12593-605 [PMID: 26354924]
  16. Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):423-7 [PMID: 22553044]
  17. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Mar;38(3):464-73 [PMID: 17990089]
  18. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Jul;36(5):623-36 [PMID: 16755332]
  19. Cognition. 2011 Oct;121(1):154-61 [PMID: 21757191]
  20. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2019 Jun;31(3):128-134 [PMID: 30558689]
  21. Cortex. 2006 Jul;42(5):705-10 [PMID: 16909630]
  22. Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):1144-54 [PMID: 18158145]
  23. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 16;9:565 [PMID: 26528169]
  24. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6 [PMID: 11113214]
  25. Brain Inj. 2013;27(7-8):896-902 [PMID: 23789866]
  26. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2005 Dec;18(4):193-7 [PMID: 16340391]
  27. Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Jun;22(2):154-69 [PMID: 22538385]
  28. Child Dev. 2004 Jul-Aug;75(4):987-1002 [PMID: 15260859]
  29. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 May;10(3):427-41 [PMID: 15147600]
  30. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Feb;104(2):216-35 [PMID: 23276267]
  31. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jan;38(1):179-85 [PMID: 24447115]
  32. Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1084-1093 [PMID: 29741993]
  33. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Apr;7(4):393-402 [PMID: 21421730]
  34. J Neuropsychol. 2018 Jun;12(2):200-215 [PMID: 28168820]
  35. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 04;8(4):e60418 [PMID: 23593213]
  36. Brain. 2002 Oct;125(Pt 10):2152-90 [PMID: 12244076]
  37. J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;34(13):4741-9 [PMID: 24672018]
  38. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2018 Sep;23(5):307-320 [PMID: 30096993]

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Empathy
Humans
Morals
Problem Solving

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0moralreasoningKSpatientsfunctioningdecision-makingabilitiesempathyexecutivedilemmassyndromematurityeverydayabstractKorsakoff'sdisplayMoralpreservedlowerlevelssocialneuropsychiatricdisordercausedvitaminB1deficiencyAlthoughknowndiminishedtheorymindfrequentlyexhibitmarkedantisocialinteractionslittleattentionfarfocusedintegrityexperimentalcross-sectionaldesign20diagnosedtwentyage-education-gender-equivalenthealthyparticipantsperformedtestsassessingParticipantsadministeredBehaviourInventoryMBItencartoonsResponsesscoredaccordingKohlbergstagesEmpathyassessedInterpersonalReactivityIndexIRIFrontalAssessmentBatteryFABcontrastfrontaltraumaticbraininjuryutilitarianbiassuggestinginterestsignificantlymoderatelyrelatedleveltasksconclusionpoorersituationsLowertogethermayresponsibleadverseKorsakoffskills

Similar Articles

Cited By