Recovery Responses of Central Hemodynamics in Basketball Athletes and Controls After the Bruce Test.

Yahui Zhang, Lin Qi, Frans van de Vosse, Chenglin Du, Yudong Yao, Jianhang Du, Guifu Wu, Lisheng Xu
Author Information
  1. Yahui Zhang: College of Medicine and Biomedical Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  2. Lin Qi: College of Medicine and Biomedical Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  3. Frans van de Vosse: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  4. Chenglin Du: Department of Physical Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  5. Yudong Yao: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States.
  6. Jianhang Du: Department of Cardiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  7. Guifu Wu: Department of Cardiology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  8. Lisheng Xu: College of Medicine and Biomedical Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is commonly believed that central hemodynamics is closely associated with the presence of cardiovascular events. However, controversial data exist on the acute response of competitive sports on central hemodynamics. Moreover, the central hemodynamic response to exercise is too transient to be investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the central hemodynamic response in young basketball athletes and controls after 1 h recovery after exercise.
METHODS: Fifteen young basketball athletes and fifteen aged-matched controls were recruited to perform the Bruce test. Central hemodynamics were measured and calculated, including heart rate (HR), aortic systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure (ASP, ADP, and APP), ejection duration (ED), sub-endocardial viability ratio (SEVR), central augmentation index (AIx), and AIx@HR75. Intra-group and inter-group differences were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA.
RESULTS: ASP significantly decreased at 10 min after exercise in athletes, while it markedly declined at 15 min after exercise in controls ( < 0.01). Additionally, only in the athlete group, ADP significantly decreased at 50 min and at 1 h after exercise. AIx was also significantly reduced at 1-2, 20, 30, and 40 min after exercise (all < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant differences in the changes of these parameters between the two groups at these measurement points ( < 0.05). SEVR significantly recovered to the baseline level after 30 min, while ED and HR returned to baseline levels at 40 min after exercise in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Sustained decrease of aortic BPs was sooner after the cessation of exercise in athletes than in controls, and changes of aortic stiffness were more evident in athletes than those in controls during the 1 h recovery period. Additionally, SEVR returned to the baseline sooner than ED and HR in athletes.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Hypertens. 2005 May;18(5 Pt 1):679-83 [PMID: 15882551]
  2. Am J Physiol. 1999 Jan;276(1):H27-32 [PMID: 9887013]
  3. Res Sports Med. 2010 Apr;18(2):97-114 [PMID: 20397113]
  4. Circulation. 2010 Sep 21;122(12):1221-38 [PMID: 20855669]
  5. Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 17;9:1468 [PMID: 30459633]
  6. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jul;63(1):270-6 [PMID: 3624130]
  7. Circulation. 1995 Jan 15;91(2):580-615 [PMID: 7805272]
  8. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Feb;38(2):318-22 [PMID: 16531901]
  9. J Hypertens. 2011 Mar;29(3):454-9 [PMID: 21252703]
  10. Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(15):1865-71 [PMID: 20197424]
  11. Hypertension. 1993 Nov;22(5):653-64 [PMID: 8225525]
  12. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Apr;115(4):739-46 [PMID: 25428726]
  13. Hypertension. 2005 May;45(5):980-5 [PMID: 15837821]
  14. Circulation. 1969 Apr;39(4):517-22 [PMID: 5778252]
  15. Am J Hypertens. 2010 Sep;23(9):974-9 [PMID: 20489686]
  16. J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Jul;11(4):390-5 [PMID: 17368101]
  17. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):154-60 [PMID: 17562972]
  18. J Physiol. 1993 Oct;470:231-41 [PMID: 8308728]
  19. Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 14;9:1590 [PMID: 30487751]
  20. Circulation. 2015 Jul 7;132(1):10-9 [PMID: 25977310]
  21. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Dec;32(6):1164-9 [PMID: 18059591]
  22. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:752570 [PMID: 25710022]
  23. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 24;51(25):2432-9 [PMID: 18565402]
  24. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009 Apr;36(4):413-8 [PMID: 19018798]
  25. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Aug;116(8):1537-44 [PMID: 27278522]
  26. J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Apr;16(4):225-36 [PMID: 11967715]
  27. Acta Cardiol. 2017 Dec 28;:1-7 [PMID: 29283315]
  28. N Engl J Med. 1999 Oct 28;341(18):1351-7 [PMID: 10536127]
  29. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14 Suppl 1:S17 [PMID: 25602805]
  30. J Hum Hypertens. 2012 Jan;26(1):64-70 [PMID: 21228823]
  31. Front Physiol. 2015 Oct 07;6:268 [PMID: 26500554]
  32. Physiol Meas. 2016 Apr;37(4):544-53 [PMID: 26999470]
  33. Circulation. 2003 Jan 7;107(1):e2-5 [PMID: 12515760]
  34. Physiol Rev. 2008 Jul;88(3):1009-86 [PMID: 18626066]
  35. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1977 Mar;17(1):17-24 [PMID: 895110]
  36. Am J Hypertens. 2007 Sep;20(9):967-73 [PMID: 17765138]
  37. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Mar-Apr;5(2):85-93 [PMID: 21414563]
  38. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 May;39(5):842-8 [PMID: 17468584]
  39. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Feb;114(2):235-41 [PMID: 24213884]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exerciseathletescentralmincontrolsresponsesignificantlyhemodynamicshemodynamicbasketball1hrecoveryHRaorticEDSEVR<0baselineacuteMoreoveryoungBrucetestCentralASPADPAIxdifferencesdecreasedAdditionally304005changesgroupsreturnedsoonerPURPOSE:commonlybelievedcloselyassociatedpresencecardiovasculareventsHowevercontroversialdataexistcompetitivesportstransientinvestigatedThereforestudyaimedinvestigateMETHODS:Fifteenfifteenaged-matchedrecruitedperformmeasuredcalculatedincludingheartratesystolicdiastolicpulsepressureAPPejectiondurationsub-endocardialviabilityratioaugmentationindexAIx@HR75Intra-groupinter-groupanalyzedtwo-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVARESULTS:10markedlydeclined1501athletegroup50alsoreduced1-220significantparameterstwomeasurementpointsrecoveredlevellevelsCONCLUSION:SustaineddecreaseBPscessationstiffnessevidentperiodRecoveryResponsesHemodynamicsBasketballAthletesControlsTest1-hbruce

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)