Plant Health and Rhizosphere Microbiome: Effects of the Bionematicide in Tomato Plants Infested by .

Claudia Leoni, Elisabetta Piancone, Nicola Sasanelli, Giovanni Luigi Bruno, Caterina Manzari, Graziano Pesole, Luigi R Ceci, Mariateresa Volpicella
Author Information
  1. Claudia Leoni: Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  2. Elisabetta Piancone: Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy.
  3. Nicola Sasanelli: Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Via G. Amendola 122/D, 70126 Bari, Italy.
  4. Giovanni Luigi Bruno: Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  5. Caterina Manzari: Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy.
  6. Graziano Pesole: Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  7. Luigi R Ceci: Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. ORCID
  8. Mariateresa Volpicella: Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, CNR, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

The artificial introduction in the soil of antagonistic microorganisms can be a successful strategy, alternative to agrochemicals, for the control of the root-knot nematodes ( spp.) and for preserving plant health. On the other hand, plant roots and the associated rhizosphere constitute a complex system in which the contribution of microbial community is fundamental to plant health and development, since microbes may convert organic and inorganic substances into available plant nutrients. In the present study, the potential nematicidal activity of the biopesticide ( strain MX-95) against the root-knot nematode in infected tomato plants was investigated. Specifically, the effect of the treatment on plant fitness was evaluated observing the plant morphological traits and also considering the nematode propagation parameters, the MX-95 vitality and population density. In addition, the treatment effects on the rhizosphere microbiome were analysed by a metabarcoding procedure. Treatments with isolate MX-95 significantly decreased root gall severity index and soil nematode population. The treatment also resulted in increased rhizosphere microbial populations. can be favourably considered as a new bionematicide to control infestation.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Aug;38:188-196 [PMID: 28732267]
  2. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217 [PMID: 23630581]
  3. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:53-77 [PMID: 11701859]
  4. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jan;16(1):170-1 [PMID: 5636462]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 18;117(7):3874-3883 [PMID: 32015118]
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6 [PMID: 23193283]
  7. Microb Ecol. 2019 Aug;78(2):470-481 [PMID: 30666369]
  8. Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1097-100 [PMID: 21551032]
  9. PLoS One. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9490 [PMID: 20224823]
  10. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 25;12:118 [PMID: 21518444]
  11. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Nov;18(11):607-621 [PMID: 32788714]
  12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W180-W188 [PMID: 28449106]
  13. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857 [PMID: 31341288]
  14. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80 [PMID: 23329690]
  15. Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3 [PMID: 27214047]
  16. Microorganisms. 2020 Jun 22;8(6): [PMID: 32580393]
  17. Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 28;11:313 [PMID: 32184773]
  18. J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Aug 26;68(34):9100-9109 [PMID: 32786872]
  19. Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86 [PMID: 22564542]
  20. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 May;100(9):3799-812 [PMID: 26715220]
  21. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Mar;100:64-74 [PMID: 26774866]
  22. Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60 [PMID: 21702898]
  23. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 08;: [PMID: 30295674]
  24. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:67-95 [PMID: 25938277]
  25. Genes (Basel). 2019 Nov 26;10(12): [PMID: 31779234]
  26. Front Microbiol. 2017 Sep 04;8:1561 [PMID: 28928718]
  27. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 03;10(4):e1003531 [PMID: 24699258]
  28. F1000Res. 2018 Nov 1;7:1734 [PMID: 30613396]
  29. Biology (Basel). 2012 Oct 01;1(3):495-507 [PMID: 24832505]
  30. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 04;9:1133 [PMID: 29915566]
  31. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014 Dec;361(1):8-9 [PMID: 25288103]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plantrhizosphereMX-95nematodetreatmentsoilcancontrolroot-knothealthmicrobialalsopopulationmicrobiomeartificialintroductionantagonisticmicroorganismssuccessfulstrategyalternativeagrochemicalsnematodesspppreservinghandrootsassociatedconstitutecomplexsystemcontributioncommunityfundamentaldevelopmentsincemicrobesmayconvertorganicinorganicsubstancesavailablenutrientspresentstudypotentialnematicidalactivitybiopesticidestraininfectedtomatoplantsinvestigatedSpecificallyeffectfitnessevaluatedobservingmorphologicaltraitsconsideringpropagationparametersvitalitydensityadditioneffectsanalysedmetabarcodingprocedureTreatmentsisolatesignificantlydecreasedrootgallseverityindexresultedincreasedpopulationsfavourablyconsiderednewbionematicideinfestationPlantHealthRhizosphereMicrobiome:EffectsBionematicideTomatoPlantsInfestedAphanocladiumalbumMeloidogynejavanicabiocontrolagent

Similar Articles

Cited By