Linear infrastructure habitats increase landscape-scale diversity of plants but not of flower-visiting insects.

Juliana Dániel-Ferreira, Riccardo Bommarco, Jörgen Wissman, Erik Öckinger
Author Information
  1. Juliana Dániel-Ferreira: Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. juliana.daniel.f@slu.se. ORCID
  2. Riccardo Bommarco: Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. ORCID
  3. Jörgen Wissman: Swedish Biodiversity Centre, CBM, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7016, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. ORCID
  4. Erik Öckinger: Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. ORCID

Abstract

Habitats along linear infrastructure, such as roads and electrical transmission lines, can have high local biodiversity. To determine whether these habitats also contribute to landscape-scale biodiversity, we estimated species richness, evenness and phylogenetic diversity of plant, butterfly and bumblebee communities in 32 km landscapes with or without power line corridors, and with contrasting areas of road verges. Landscapes with power line corridors had on average six more plant species than landscapes without power lines, but there was no such effect for butterflies and bumblebees. Plant communities displayed considerable evenness in species abundances both in landscapes with and without power lines and high and low road verge densities. We hypothesize that the higher number of plant species in landscapes with power line corridors is due to these landscapes having a higher extinction debt than the landscapes without power line corridors, such that plant diversity is declining slower in landscapes with power lines. This calls for targeted conservation actions in semi-natural grasslands within landscapes with power line corridors to maintain biodiversity and prevent imminent population extinctions.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.13286141

References

  1. Am Nat. 2003 Dec;162(6):734-43 [PMID: 14737711]
  2. R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Nov 23;3(11):160525 [PMID: 28018640]
  3. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Oct;24(10):564-71 [PMID: 19665254]
  4. Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):538-47 [PMID: 21352458]
  5. Ecol Lett. 2014 Sep;17(9):1168-77 [PMID: 25040328]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20142620 [PMID: 25567651]
  7. Ecology. 2006 Apr;87(4):942-51 [PMID: 16676538]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:409-419 [PMID: 27887833]
  9. Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S17-27 [PMID: 25576277]
  10. Science. 2019 Jan 18;363(6424):282-284 [PMID: 30655441]
  11. Ecol Lett. 2010 May;13(5):597-605 [PMID: 20337698]
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 22;279(1727):309-15 [PMID: 21676979]
  13. Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):216-8 [PMID: 27418487]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bees
Biodiversity
Butterflies
Ecosystem
Insecta
Plants

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0landscapespowerlinecorridorslinesspeciesplantwithoutbiodiversitydiversityinfrastructurehighhabitatslandscape-scaleevennesscommunitiesroadhigherHabitatsalonglinearroadselectricaltransmissioncanlocaldeterminewhetheralsocontributeestimatedrichnessphylogeneticbutterflybumblebee32 kmcontrastingareasvergesLandscapesaveragesixeffectbutterfliesbumblebeesPlantdisplayedconsiderableabundanceslowvergedensitieshypothesizenumberdueextinctiondebtdecliningslowercallstargetedconservationactionssemi-naturalgrasslandswithinmaintainpreventimminentpopulationextinctionsLinearincreaseplantsflower-visitinginsects

Similar Articles

Cited By