Examination of an averaging method for estimating repulsion and attraction interactions in moving groups.

Rajnesh K Mudaliar, Timothy M Schaerf
Author Information
  1. Rajnesh K Mudaliar: School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
  2. Timothy M Schaerf: School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

Groups of animals coordinate remarkable, coherent, movement patterns during periods of collective motion. Such movement patterns include the toroidal mills seen in fish shoals, highly aligned parallel motion like that of flocks of migrating birds, and the swarming of insects. Since the 1970's a wide range of collective motion models have been studied that prescribe rules of interaction between individuals, and that are capable of generating emergent patterns that are visually similar to those seen in real animal group. This does not necessarily mean that real animals apply exactly the same interactions as those prescribed in models. In more recent work, researchers have sought to infer the rules of interaction of real animals directly from tracking data, by using a number of techniques, including averaging methods. In one of the simplest formulations, the averaging methods determine the mean changes in the components of the velocity of an individual over time as a function of the relative coordinates of group mates. The averaging methods can also be used to estimate other closely related quantities including the mean relative direction of motion of group mates as a function of their relative coordinates. Since these methods for extracting interaction rules and related quantities from trajectory data are relatively new, the accuracy of these methods has had limited inspection. In this paper, we examine the ability of an averaging method to reveal prescribed rules of interaction from data generated by two individual based models for collective motion. Our work suggests that an averaging method can capture the qualitative features of underlying interactions from trajectory data alone, including repulsion and attraction effects evident in changes in speed and direction of motion, and the presence of a blind zone. However, our work also illustrates that the output from a simple averaging method can be affected by emergent group level patterns of movement, and the sizes of the regions over which repulsion and attraction effects are apparent can be distorted depending on how individuals combine interactions with multiple group mates.

References

  1. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2):e1002915 [PMID: 23468605]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11865-70 [PMID: 20547832]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12576-80 [PMID: 20616032]
  4. Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):743-8 [PMID: 24880877]
  5. Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Mar 17;96(10):104302 [PMID: 16605738]
  6. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31711 [PMID: 22359617]
  7. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jan 11;14(1):e1005933 [PMID: 29324853]
  8. J R Soc Interface. 2021 Mar;18(176):20200925 [PMID: 33784885]
  9. Sci Adv. 2017 Jun 23;3(6):e1603201 [PMID: 28691088]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 14;375(1807):20190380 [PMID: 32713309]
  11. Nature. 2000 Sep 28;407(6803):487-90 [PMID: 11028994]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18726-31 [PMID: 22065759]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18720-5 [PMID: 21795604]
  14. Phys Rev E. 2016 Apr;93:043112 [PMID: 27176395]
  15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):5-22 [PMID: 16553306]
  16. Bull Math Biol. 2012 Nov;74(11):2600-21 [PMID: 22890574]
  17. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Sep 13;15(9):e1007354 [PMID: 31518357]
  18. J Theor Biol. 2011 Aug 21;283(1):145-51 [PMID: 21620861]
  19. J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 7;218(1):1-11 [PMID: 12297066]
  20. Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):890-3 [PMID: 20376149]
  21. Chaos. 2019 Dec;29(12):123125 [PMID: 31893635]
  22. R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jul 12;4(7):170043 [PMID: 28791135]
  23. Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Aug 7;75(6):1226-1229 [PMID: 10060237]
  24. Bull Math Biol. 2012 Mar;74(3):536-61 [PMID: 21800229]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16172-7 [PMID: 20713700]
  26. Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6 [PMID: 15690039]
  27. Nat Methods. 2009 Jun;6(6):451-7 [PMID: 19412169]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1232-7 [PMID: 18227508]
  29. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jul 24;10(7):e1003697 [PMID: 25057853]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Computer Simulation
Models, Biological
Movement
Social Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0averagingmotiongroupmethodspatternsrulesinteractioninteractionsdatacanmethodanimalsmovementcollectivemodelsrealmeanworkincludingrelativematesrepulsionattractionseenSinceindividualsemergentprescribedchangesindividualfunctioncoordinatesalsorelatedquantitiesdirectiontrajectoryeffectsGroupscoordinateremarkablecoherentperiodsincludetoroidalmillsfishshoalshighlyalignedparallellikeflocksmigratingbirdsswarminginsects1970'swiderangestudiedprescribecapablegeneratingvisuallysimilaranimalnecessarilyapplyexactlyrecentresearcherssoughtinferdirectlytrackingusingnumbertechniquesonesimplestformulationsdeterminecomponentsvelocitytimeusedestimatecloselyextractingrelativelynewaccuracylimitedinspectionpaperexamineabilityrevealgeneratedtwobasedsuggestscapturequalitativefeaturesunderlyingaloneevidentspeedpresenceblindzoneHoweverillustratesoutputsimpleaffectedlevelsizesregionsapparentdistorteddependingcombinemultipleExaminationestimatingmovinggroups

Similar Articles

Cited By