The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: Reality or speculations?

Gulzhanat Aimagambetova, Alpamys Issanov, Sanja Terzic, Gauri Bapayeva, Talshyn Ukybassova, Saltanat Baikoshkarova, Aidana Aldiyarova, Fariza Shauyen, Milan Terzic
Author Information
  1. Gulzhanat Aimagambetova: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. ORCID
  2. Alpamys Issanov: Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  3. Sanja Terzic: Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  4. Gauri Bapayeva: Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, National Research Center of Mother and Child Health, University Medical Center, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  5. Talshyn Ukybassova: Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, National Research Center of Mother and Child Health, University Medical Center, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  6. Saltanat Baikoshkarova: IVF Clinic "Ecomed", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  7. Aidana Aldiyarova: Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, National Research Center of Mother and Child Health, University Medical Center, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  8. Fariza Shauyen: Clinical Academic Department of Women's Health, National Research Center of Mother and Child Health, University Medical Center, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
  9. Milan Terzic: Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Infertility is a problem that affects millions of people worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of stress, depression and anxiety on the IVF outcomes in Kazakhstan.
METHODS: The prospective cohort study was performed using questionnaires to assess psychological distress in 304 infertile female in three different cities in Kazakhstan.
RESULTS: The average age of participants was 33.7 years with infertility duration of 5.9 years. Regarding stress, depression and anxiety we found that more than 80% of all respondents had CES-D score higher than 16, indicating that they are at risk of developing clinical depression. On average, FPI subscales' scores, global stress score and anxiety scale (STAI-S and STAI-T) scores were statistically significantly higher among not pregnant women than pregnant women. Similarly, in simple logistic regression analysis all FPI subscales scores, global stress scale score and anxiety scales' scores were negatively associated with clinical pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: Rates of stress, anxiety and depression among IVF patients are higher than in general population. If the level of infertility-related stress is higher, IVF success rate is lower. Findings of our study indicate the need for the specific psychological interventions for all infertility women, to improve IVF success rate.

References

  1. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020 Feb;80(2):200-210 [PMID: 32109972]
  2. Psychol Aging. 1997 Jun;12(2):277-87 [PMID: 9189988]
  3. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:131-135 [PMID: 28813283]
  4. Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2763-76 [PMID: 21807816]
  5. Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2969-75 [PMID: 16123098]
  6. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Nov;14(11):1954-60 [PMID: 17135611]
  7. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):447-54 [PMID: 19171335]
  8. Urologiia. 2016 Feb;(1):75-81 [PMID: 28247708]
  9. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):41-47 [PMID: 29946210]
  10. Fertil Steril. 2018 Dec;110(7):1194-1202 [PMID: 30503105]
  11. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):84-9 [PMID: 16412735]
  12. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1344-6 [PMID: 26404708]
  13. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jun 12;7:347-56 [PMID: 26109873]
  14. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):605-21 [PMID: 18820005]
  15. Med Sci Monit. 2016 Nov 16;22:4386-4392 [PMID: 27847382]
  16. J Affect Disord. 2018 Jul;234:270-275 [PMID: 29554615]
  17. Fertil Steril. 2001 Oct;76(4):675-87 [PMID: 11591398]
  18. Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1237-1246 [PMID: 29796614]
  19. Clin Biochem. 2018 Dec;62:2-10 [PMID: 29555319]
  20. Fertil Res Pract. 2016 Oct 12;2:11 [PMID: 28620538]
  21. Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):404-8 [PMID: 21722893]
  22. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Jul 24;17(1):48 [PMID: 28738833]
  23. J Biosoc Sci. 2017 Nov;49(S1):S62-S73 [PMID: 29160189]
  24. Fertil Steril. 2020 Mar;113(3):533-535 [PMID: 32115183]
  25. BMC Res Notes. 2019 May 9;12(1):256 [PMID: 31072342]
  26. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Jan;30(1):35-41 [PMID: 23212833]
  27. Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):459-64 [PMID: 22698636]
  28. Iran J Public Health. 2018 Jan;47(1):135-137 [PMID: 29318130]
  29. Asian J Androl. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):597-601 [PMID: 24625883]
  30. Psychosom Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;59(4):447-57 [PMID: 9251165]
  31. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):54-62 [PMID: 10428148]
  32. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):e377-e384 [PMID: 31135764]
  33. Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2173-82 [PMID: 19465459]
  34. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Sep-Oct;13(5):433-44 [PMID: 17584821]
  35. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2618-20 [PMID: 21601850]
  36. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Dec;7(6):683-90 [PMID: 14748968]

MeSH Term

Adult
Anxiety
Depression
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Infertility, Female
Kazakhstan
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Prospective Studies
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychological Distress
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stressanxietyIVFdepressionhigherscoresstudypsychologicalscorewomenassesseffectKazakhstandistressaverageyearsinfertilityclinicalFPIglobalscaleamongpregnantsuccessrateINTRODUCTION:InfertilityproblemaffectsmillionspeopleworldwideaimoutcomesMETHODS:prospectivecohortperformedusingquestionnaires304infertilefemalethreedifferentcitiesRESULTS:ageparticipants337duration59Regardingfound80%respondentsCES-D16indicatingriskdevelopingsubscales'STAI-SSTAI-TstatisticallysignificantlySimilarlysimplelogisticregressionanalysissubscalesscales'negativelyassociatedpregnancyCONCLUSION:Ratespatientsgeneralpopulationlevelinfertility-relatedlowerFindingsindicateneedspecificinterventionsimproveoutcomes:Realityspeculations?

Similar Articles

Cited By