The effect of multiple exposures in scenario-based simulation-A mixed study systematic review.

Alette H Svellingen, Margrethe B Søvik, Kari Røykenes, Guttorm Brattebø
Author Information
  1. Alette H Svellingen: Centre of Diaconia and Professional Practice VID Specialized University Oslo Norway. ORCID
  2. Margrethe B Søvik: Faculty of Health Studies VID Specialized University Bergen Norway.
  3. Kari Røykenes: Faculty of Health Studies VID Specialized University Bergen Norway.
  4. Guttorm Brattebø: Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.

Abstract

Aims: To examine the use and effects of multiple simulations in nursing education.
Design: A mixed study systematic review. Databases (CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, ERIC, Education source and Science Direct) were searched for studies published until April 2020.
Method: Researchers analysed the articles. Bias risk was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Results: In total, 27 studies were included and four themes identified. Students participated in multiple simulation sessions, over weeks to years, which included 1-4 scenarios in various nursing contexts. Simulations were used to prepare for, or partly replace, students' clinical practice. Learning was described in terms of knowledge, competence and confidence.
Conclusion: Multiple scenario-based simulation is a positive intervention that can be implemented in various courses during every academic year to promote nursing students' learning. Further longitudinal research is required, including randomized studies, with transparency regarding study design and instruments.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Dec;20(23-24):3543-52 [PMID: 21917033]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:419-21 [PMID: 26599594]
  3. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):349-55 [PMID: 23706963]
  4. Nurs Outlook. 2009 Nov-Dec;57(6):332-7 [PMID: 19942034]
  5. J Nurs Educ. 2019 Oct 1;58(10):561-568 [PMID: 31573644]
  6. Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):434-440 [PMID: 31093991]
  7. Nursing. 2017 Jul;47(7):18-20 [PMID: 28640045]
  8. J Nurs Educ. 2017 Mar 1;56(3):139-144 [PMID: 28263351]
  9. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Apr;51(4):236-9 [PMID: 22356359]
  10. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e025306 [PMID: 30798316]
  11. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Dec;51(12):668-75 [PMID: 23061524]
  12. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Sep;32:108-114 [PMID: 29776744]
  13. Collegian. 2014;21(4):257-65 [PMID: 25632722]
  14. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:28-34 [PMID: 28987895]
  15. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Nov;27:45-62 [PMID: 28843948]
  16. Contemp Nurse. 2011 Apr-Jun;38(1-2):180-90 [PMID: 21854249]
  17. Comput Inform Nurs. 2020 Jul;38(7):367-372 [PMID: 32349024]
  18. Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 29;8(1):380-394 [PMID: 33318846]
  19. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2015 Mar 19;12: [PMID: 25803087]
  20. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Jan 13;43:102698 [PMID: 32004851]
  21. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 May 17;1:13 [PMID: 29449982]
  22. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):72-7 [PMID: 27209864]
  23. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):47-53 [PMID: 26223405]
  24. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:11-16 [PMID: 28505519]
  25. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Sep;26:33-38 [PMID: 28666183]
  26. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:112-121 [PMID: 28575708]
  27. Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):358-368 [PMID: 30852844]
  28. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):176-82 [PMID: 25459172]
  29. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29-45 [PMID: 24188053]
  30. Simul Healthc. 2011 Oct;6(5):269-77 [PMID: 21785388]
  31. Nurse Educ. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):231-235 [PMID: 28099372]
  32. Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Oct;28(7):790-7 [PMID: 18479785]
  33. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:298-303 [PMID: 26260522]
  34. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535 [PMID: 19622551]
  35. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:63-71 [PMID: 27902949]
  36. J Nurs Educ. 2010 Jan;49(1):43-7 [PMID: 19810668]
  37. Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):2275-80 [PMID: 24913639]
  38. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):820-830 [PMID: 32198825]
  39. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Nov;30(8):827-32 [PMID: 20483188]
  40. Nurse Educ. 2018 Mar/Apr;43(2):106-108 [PMID: 28817474]
  41. Med Educ. 2018 Feb;52(2):150-160 [PMID: 28949032]
  42. Nurse Educ. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):84-87 [PMID: 29912030]
  43. Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):61 [PMID: 28335799]
  44. Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):110-4 [PMID: 19088615]

MeSH Term

Clinical Competence
Education, Nursing
Humans
Learning
Students, Nursing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0multiplenursingstudysimulationmixedsystematicreviewstudieseducationBiasincludedvariousstudents'clinicalcompetencescenario-basedlearningAims:examineuseeffectssimulationsDesign:DatabasesCINAHLMedlinePubMedEMBASEERICEducationsourceScienceDirectsearchedpublishedApril2020Method:ResearchersanalysedarticlesriskevaluatedusingCriticalAppraisalSkillsProgrammeCochraneRisktoolResults:total27fourthemesidentifiedStudentsparticipatedsessionsweeksyears1-4scenarioscontextsSimulationsusedpreparepartlyreplacepracticeLearningdescribedtermsknowledgeconfidenceConclusion:Multiplepositiveinterventioncanimplementedcourseseveryacademicyearpromotelongitudinalresearchrequiredincludingrandomizedtransparencyregardingdesigninstrumentseffectexposuressimulation-Astudentsscenario‐based

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)