Pantomime (Not Silent Gesture) in Multimodal Communication: Evidence From Children's Narratives.

Paula Marentette, Reyhan Furman, Marcus E Suvanto, Elena Nicoladis
Author Information
  1. Paula Marentette: Augustana Campus, University of Alberta, Camrose, AB, Canada.
  2. Reyhan Furman: School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
  3. Marcus E Suvanto: Center for Studies in Behavioral Neuroscience, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  4. Elena Nicoladis: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Abstract

Pantomime has long been considered distinct from co-speech gesture. It has therefore been argued that pantomime cannot be part of gesture-speech integration. We examine pantomime as distinct from silent gesture, focusing on non-co-speech gestures that occur in the midst of children's spoken narratives. We propose that gestures with features of pantomime are an infrequent but meaningful component of a multimodal communicative strategy. We examined spontaneous non-co-speech representational gesture production in the narratives of 30 monolingual English-speaking children between the ages of 8- and 11-years. We compared the use of co-speech and non-co-speech gestures in both autobiographical and fictional narratives and examined viewpoint and the use of non-manual articulators, as well as the length of responses and narrative quality. The use of non-co-speech gestures was associated with longer narratives of equal or higher quality than those using only co-speech gestures. Non-co-speech gestures were most likely to adopt character-viewpoint and use non-manual articulators. The present study supports a deeper understanding of the term pantomime and its multimodal use by children in the integration of speech and gesture.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):51-67 [PMID: 30788798]
  2. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):194-206 [PMID: 18448606]
  3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):652-665 [PMID: 27604493]
  4. Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):245-266 [PMID: 28240923]
  5. J Child Lang. 2015 May;42(3):662-81 [PMID: 25088361]
  6. Gesture (Amst). 2009;9(3):290-311 [PMID: 26740817]
  7. Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):95-123 [PMID: 25529989]
  8. Conscious Cogn. 2017 Nov;56:50-57 [PMID: 29065315]
  9. J Child Lang. 2015 Jan;42(1):122-45 [PMID: 24529301]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):34-55 [PMID: 8650298]
  11. Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;123(3):324-47 [PMID: 26855255]
  12. Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;42(3):1001-1014 [PMID: 28481418]
  13. Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):12-35 [PMID: 25348839]
  14. Cognition. 2016 Mar;148:10-8 [PMID: 26707427]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gesturegesturespantomimenon-co-speechuseco-speechnarrativesintegrationmultimodalchildrenPantomimedistinctgesture-speechsilentexaminednon-manualarticulatorsnarrativequalitylongconsideredthereforearguedpartexaminefocusingoccurmidstchildren'sspokenproposefeaturesinfrequentmeaningfulcomponentcommunicativestrategyspontaneousrepresentationalproduction30monolingualEnglish-speakingages8-11-yearscomparedautobiographicalfictionalviewpointwelllengthresponsesassociatedlongerequalhigherusingNon-co-speechlikelyadoptcharacter-viewpointpresentstudysupportsdeeperunderstandingtermspeechSilentGestureMultimodalCommunication:EvidenceChildren'sNarrativescommunication

Similar Articles

Cited By