Development of a stepwise tool to aide primary health care professionals in the process of deprescribing in older persons.

Roxana De Las Salas, Javier Eslava-Schmalbach, Claudia Vaca-González, Dolores Rodríguez, Albert Figueras
Author Information
  1. Roxana De Las Salas: BSN, MSc. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia). rpdem@unal.edu.co. ORCID
  2. Javier Eslava-Schmalbach: MD, MSc, PhD. Professor. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia). jheslavas@unal.edu.co. ORCID
  3. Claudia Vaca-González: Pharm, MSc. Associate professor. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Colombia. Bogotá (Colombia). cpvacag@unal.edu.co. ORCID
  4. Dolores Rodríguez: MD, PhD. Assistant professor. Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Autonomous University of Barcelona. Barcelona (Spain). drficf@gmail.com. ORCID
  5. Albert Figueras: MD, PhD. Professor. Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Autonomous University of Barcelona. Barcelona (Spain). afs@icf.uab.cat. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a stepwise tool to aid primary health care professionals in the process of deprescribing potentially inappropriate medication in older persons.
METHODS: We carried out a systematic review to identify previously published tools. A composite proposal of algorithm was made by following the steps from clinical experience to deprescribe medications. A 2-round electronic Delphi method was conducted to establish consensus. Eighteen experts from different countries (Colombia, Spain and Argentina) accepted to be part of the panel representing geriatricians, internists, endocrinologist, general practitioners, pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists, family physicians and nurses. Panel members were asked to mark a Likert Scale from 1 to 9 points (1= strongly disagree, 9= strongly agree). The content validity ratio, item-level content validity, and Fleiss' Kappa statistics was measured to establish reliability. The same voting method was used for round 2.
RESULTS: A 7-question algorithm was proposed. Each question was part of a domain and conduct into a decision. In round 1, a consensus was not reached but statements were grouped and organized. In round 2, the tool met consensus. The inter-rater reliability was between substantial and almost perfect for questions with Kappa=0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.93), for domains with Kappa= 0.73 (95%CI 0.60-0.86) and for decisions with Kappa= 0.97 (95%CI 0.90-1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: This is a novel tool that captures and supports healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making for deprescribing potentially inappropriate medication. This includes patient's and caregiver's preferences about medication. This tool will help to standardize care and provide guidance on the prescribing/deprescribing process of older persons' medications. Also, it provides a holistic way to reduce polypharmacy and inappropriate medications in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125 [PMID: 27893129]
  2. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):857-64 [PMID: 24565882]
  3. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):273-86 [PMID: 22500543]
  4. Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):90-6 [PMID: 25313240]
  5. Acute Med Surg. 2015 Aug 27;3(2):107-113 [PMID: 29123761]
  6. Intern Med J. 2016 Jan;46(1):35-42 [PMID: 26387783]
  7. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Aug;30(2):239-45 [PMID: 7249508]
  8. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):473-82 [PMID: 26998708]
  9. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):217-36 [PMID: 22500540]
  10. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898 [PMID: 30422193]
  11. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Jun;9(6):430-4 [PMID: 17642388]
  12. Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Sep;10(4):430-9 [PMID: 21402176]
  13. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e016358 [PMID: 29042378]
  14. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jul;56(7):1306-11 [PMID: 18482301]
  15. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0161248 [PMID: 27517450]
  16. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e112133 [PMID: 25402452]
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD008165 [PMID: 22592727]
  18. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tool0clinicalcareprofessionalsprocessdeprescribinginappropriatemedicationoldermedicationsconsensusroundstepwiseprimaryhealthpotentiallypersonsalgorithmDelphimethodestablishColombiapart1stronglycontentvalidityreliability260-0Kappa=95%CIOBJECTIVE:aimstudydevelopvalidateaidMETHODS:carriedsystematicreviewidentifypreviouslypublishedtoolscompositeproposalmadefollowingstepsexperiencedeprescribe2-roundelectronicconductedEighteenexpertsdifferentcountriesSpainArgentinaacceptedpanelrepresentinggeriatriciansinternistsendocrinologistgeneralpractitionerspharmacologistspharmacistsfamilyphysiciansnursesPanelmembersaskedmarkLikertScale9points1=disagree9=agreeratioitem-levelFleiss'KappastatisticsmeasuredvotingusedRESULTS:7-questionproposedquestiondomainconductdecisionreachedstatementsgroupedorganizedmetinter-ratersubstantialalmostperfectquestionsKappa=07795%CI93domains7386decisions9790-100CONCLUSIONS:novelcapturessupportshealthcaredecision-makingincludespatient'scaregiver'spreferenceswillhelpstandardizeprovideguidanceprescribing/deprescribingpersons'AlsoprovidesholisticwayreducepolypharmacypracticeDevelopmentaideAlgorithmsClinicalDecision-MakingConsensusTechniqueDeprescriptionsGeneralPractitionersGeriatriciansInappropriatePrescribingPharmacistsPhysiciansFamilyPolypharmacyValidationStudiesTopic

Similar Articles

Cited By