Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Using Systems Archetypes to Understand Common and Recurring Issues in Sports Coaching.

Scott McLean, Gemma J M Read, Adam Hulme, Karl Dodd, Adam D Gorman, Colin Solomon, Paul M Salmon
Author Information
  1. Scott McLean: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
  2. Gemma J M Read: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
  3. Adam Hulme: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
  4. Karl Dodd: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
  5. Adam D Gorman: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  6. Colin Solomon: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
  7. Paul M Salmon: Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.

Abstract

Systems thinking, a fundamental approach for understanding complexity, is beginning to gain traction in sports science. Systems archetypes (SAs) describe common recurring patterns of system behaviors and have been used extensively in other domains to explain the system wide influences on behavior. SAs look at the deeper levels of systemic structure by identifying what creates system behaviors, which supports the development of interventions to identify and resolve problem sources. Four commonly used SAs were used to explain the dynamics underpinning recurring issues for coaching in football: (1) Fixes that fail, (2) Shifting the burden, (3) Drifting goals, and (4) Success to the successful. The SAs models were built, refined and validated by seven subject matter experts (SMEs) including experienced football researchers, systems thinking experts, an international football coach, a skill acquisition specialist, and an experienced exercise scientist. The findings show that the SAs fit well in the football coaching context, providing further evidence that a complex system thinking approach is required when considering football performance and its optimization. The developed SAs identify the factors that play a role in recurring issues in football coaching and highlight the systemic structures that contribute to the issues. The developed SAs identify the appropriate leverage points in the system where sustainable change can be made to improve coaching practice and subsequent performance of players. A common theme emerging across the analyses was that systemic problems often arise in football when quick fixes are attempted. Whereas, improvements to system behavior usually require a delay after the implementation of the appropriate corrective action. The SAs developed in the current study also provide practical templates of common problems in football that can be used to prompt discussions around how to avoid ineffective interventions and instead make sustainable improvements across multiple aspects of football performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Ergonomics. 2019 May;62(5):612-628 [PMID: 30460881]
  2. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;50(21):1309-1314 [PMID: 27445362]
  3. Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 06;10:201 [PMID: 30787902]
  4. J Sports Sci. 2010 Mar;28(5):483-95 [PMID: 20419591]
  5. Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):907-931 [PMID: 29299878]
  6. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0176322 [PMID: 28448586]
  7. J Sports Sci. 2005 Jun;23(6):629-36 [PMID: 16195011]
  8. Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:345-354 [PMID: 28802455]
  9. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172565 [PMID: 28212392]
  10. Sports Med. 2008;38(3):253-63 [PMID: 18278985]
  11. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jan;12(1):227-33 [PMID: 18083631]
  12. Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:214-225 [PMID: 29674008]
  13. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Jun;23(3):374-82 [PMID: 22092356]
  14. Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):505-14 [PMID: 16449579]
  15. Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:209-27 [PMID: 26518501]
  16. Int J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;34(10):897-903 [PMID: 23700327]
  17. Inj Epidemiol. 2015;2(1):31 [PMID: 26691678]
  18. J Sports Sci. 2017 May;35(9):852-857 [PMID: 27299705]
  19. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(24):1507-1510 [PMID: 30448782]
  20. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(14):1054-1055 [PMID: 28330847]
  21. Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):799-836 [PMID: 29243038]
  22. Ergonomics. 2017 Feb;60(2):194-205 [PMID: 26799501]
  23. Eval Program Plann. 2008 Aug;31(3):299-310 [PMID: 18272224]
  24. Sports Med. 2012 Aug 1;42(8):633-42 [PMID: 22715927]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SAssystemfootballcoachingthinkingusedperformanceSystemscommonrecurringsystemicidentifyissuesdevelopedapproacharchetypesbehaviorsexplainbehaviordevelopmentinterventionsexpertsexperiencedappropriatesustainablecanacrossproblemsimprovementsfundamentalunderstandingcomplexitybeginninggaintractionsportssciencedescribepatternsextensivelydomainswideinfluenceslookdeeperlevelsstructureidentifyingcreatessupportsresolveproblemsourcesFourcommonlydynamicsunderpinningfootball:1Fixesfail2Shiftingburden3Driftinggoals4SuccesssuccessfulmodelsbuiltrefinedvalidatedsevensubjectmatterSMEsincludingresearcherssystemsinternationalcoachskillacquisitionspecialistexercisescientistfindingsshowfitwellcontextprovidingevidencecomplexrequiredconsideringoptimizationfactorsplayrolehighlightstructurescontributeleveragepointschangemadeimprovepracticesubsequentplayersthemeemerginganalysesoftenarisequickfixesattemptedWhereasusuallyrequiredelayimplementationcorrectiveactioncurrentstudyalsoprovidepracticaltemplatespromptdiscussionsaroundavoidineffectiveinsteadmakemultipleaspectsBeyondTipIceberg:UsingArchetypesUnderstandCommonRecurringIssuesSportsCoachingtalent

Similar Articles

Cited By