Mammography: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture.

Dörthe Brüggmann, Matthias Grimstein, Christine Solbach, Doris Klingelhöfer, Michael H K Bendels, Jenny Jaque, David A Groneberg
Author Information
  1. Dörthe Brüggmann: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  2. Matthias Grimstein: Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
  3. Christine Solbach: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  4. Doris Klingelhöfer: Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
  5. Michael H K Bendels: Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. Jenny Jaque: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, California, USA.
  7. David A Groneberg: Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since mammography belongs to the most important preventive techniques in modern medicine, this study maps the related worldwide research output, which encompasses quantitative and qualitative aspects of the scientific activity and socio-economic features.
METHODS: The New Quality and Quantity Indices in Science (NewQIS) computing platform identified all mammography-specific articles in the Web of Science within two time periods, from 1900 to 2014 (P1) and from 2015 to 2020 (P2), a combination of density-equalizing mapping projections (DEMP) and socio-economic benchmarking was applied for analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 13,629 articles were retrieved. 8,744 articles were identified in P1 and 4,885 in P2. More than 100 articles were published annually since the 1980s. Regarding productivity and collaborative efforts, the United States was the leading nation in both evaluation periods. In our socioeconomic analysis, it was also ranked at the first place in P1 [72.68 mammography-related publications per GDP/capita (RGDP)]. The US was followed by the UK and Germany in P1 and by UK and India in P2. When population sizes were related to mammography research activities, Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands showed the highest research activity in P1 (e.g., Sweden: 31.89 publications per 1 million inhabitants). Gender analysis illustrated a relative dominance of female researchers in most countries with the exception of Japan.
CONCLUSIONS: The global mammography research activity over the last century is paralleled by strong international collaborative efforts and follows largely economic figures and prevalence rates but displays distinct differences in comparison to the research landscape of other biomedical entities.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer. 1971 Dec;28(6):1519-26 [PMID: 4331414]
  2. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86 [PMID: 25220842]
  3. JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2488-9 [PMID: 25058082]
  4. Cancer. 1969 Apr;23(4):855-73 [PMID: 5775976]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):1965-7 [PMID: 24738641]
  6. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Mar;9(3):465-476 [PMID: 31032193]
  7. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015 Jul;95(4):515-22 [PMID: 26032100]
  8. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):845-51 [PMID: 21399892]
  9. Scientometrics. 2019;121(1):451-478 [PMID: 32214551]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 28;11(6):5792-806 [PMID: 24879489]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 17;12(11):14690-708 [PMID: 26593932]
  12. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19(4):266-75 [PMID: 19639722]
  13. JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2499-507 [PMID: 25058084]
  14. BMC Womens Health. 2016 Sep 21;16(1):64 [PMID: 27653503]
  15. Parasit Vectors. 2015 Dec 21;8:646 [PMID: 26691532]
  16. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 4;12(1):e0169238 [PMID: 28052133]
  17. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):627-638 [PMID: 28372893]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jun;6(6):1856-69 [PMID: 19578464]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72 [PMID: 16275915]
  20. Ind Health. 2010;48(2):197-203 [PMID: 20424350]
  21. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 May-Jun;64(3):186-94 [PMID: 24647877]
  22. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2019 Jun 28;103(1):37 [PMID: 31276091]
  23. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 May 01;17:63 [PMID: 25928287]
  24. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Oct;34:e41-e43 [PMID: 27373580]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7499-504 [PMID: 15136719]
  26. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jun 13;6:6 [PMID: 18554379]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19193-8 [PMID: 18040045]
  28. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Dec;213(6):1204-1206 [PMID: 31414886]
  29. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96 [PMID: 26757170]
  30. Acta Radiol. 2019 Dec;60(12):1680-1686 [PMID: 31042069]
  31. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Feb;20(1):25-37 [PMID: 27678043]
  32. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112026 [PMID: 25409503]
  33. Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):S59 [PMID: 29565412]
  34. Int J Health Geogr. 2011 Oct 14;10:55 [PMID: 21999813]
  35. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2353-8 [PMID: 26039523]
  36. Nutr J. 2016 Apr 04;15:36 [PMID: 27044432]
  37. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2010 Feb 16;5:2 [PMID: 20925908]
  38. Int J Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2060-71 [PMID: 26135522]
  39. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30 [PMID: 28055103]
  40. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614 [PMID: 26501536]
  41. Cancer. 1975 Dec;36(6):2245-50 [PMID: 1203875]
  42. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R108 [PMID: 21176219]
  43. Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):3 [PMID: 28086974]
  44. Climacteric. 2016 Oct;19(5):463-70 [PMID: 27352827]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchP1mammographyarticlesanalysisactivityP2relatedsocio-economicScienceidentifiedperiodsmappingcollaborativeeffortspublicationsperUKcountriesglobalequalizingBACKGROUND:SincebelongsimportantpreventivetechniquesmodernmedicinestudymapsworldwideoutputencompassesquantitativequalitativeaspectsscientificfeaturesMETHODS:NewQualityQuantityIndicesNewQIScomputingplatformmammography-specificWebwithintwotime1900201420152020combinationdensity-equalizingprojectionsDEMPbenchmarkingappliedRESULTS:total13629retrieved87444885100publishedannuallysince1980sRegardingproductivityUnitedStatesleadingnationevaluationsocioeconomicalsorankedfirstplace[7268mammography-relatedGDP/capitaRGDP]USfollowedGermanyIndiapopulationsizesactivitiesScandinavianNetherlandsshowedhighestegSweden:31891millioninhabitantsGenderillustratedrelativedominancefemaleresearchersexceptionJapanCONCLUSIONS:lastcenturyparalleledstronginternationalfollowslargelyeconomicfiguresprevalenceratesdisplaysdistinctdifferencescomparisonlandscapebiomedicalentitiesMammography:densityarchitectureDensitymapspatiotemporal

Similar Articles

Cited By