System-level barriers to personal recovery in mental health: qualitative analysis of co-productive narrative dialogues between users and professionals.

Miharu Nakanishi, George Kurokawa, Junko Niimura, Atsushi Nishida, Geoff Shepherd, Syudo Yamasaki
Author Information
  1. Miharu Nakanishi: Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan. ORCID
  2. George Kurokawa: Peer Staff Department, Sudachikai Social Welfare Corporation, Japan.
  3. Junko Niimura: Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan.
  4. Atsushi Nishida: Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan.
  5. Geoff Shepherd: Program Director, Implementing Recovery through Organisational Change (ImROC), UK.
  6. Syudo Yamasaki: Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No co-productive narrative synthesis of system-level facilitators and barriers to personal recovery in mental illness has been undertaken.
AIMS: To clarify system-level facilitators and barriers to personal recovery of people with mental illness.
METHOD: Qualitative study guided by thematic analysis. Data were collected through one focus group, which involved seven service users and three professionals. This group had 11 meetings, each lasting 2 h at a local research institute, between July 2016 to January 2018.
RESULTS: The analysis yielded three themes: barriers inhibiting positive interaction within personal relationship networks, roots of barriers from mental health systems and the social cultural context, and possible solutions to address the roots. Barriers were acknowledged as those related to sense of safety, locus of control within oneself and reunion with self. The roots of barriers were recognised within mental health services, including system without trauma sensitivity, lack of advocacy support and limited access to psychosocial approaches. Roots from social cultural context were also found. There were no narratives relating to facilitators. A possible solution was to address the roots from systems. Social cultural change was called for that makes personalised goals most valued, with an inclusive design that overcomes stigma, to achieve an open and accepting community.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis yielded system-level barriers specific to each recovery process. Roots of barriers that need transformation to facilitate personal recovery were identified within mental health services. Social interventions should be further explored to translate the suggested social cultural changes into action.

Keywords

References

  1. BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e10 [PMID: 30762505]
  2. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;207(6):544-50 [PMID: 26450586]
  3. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;64(2):145-155 [PMID: 29277105]
  4. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Feb;60(2):202-9 [PMID: 19176414]
  5. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;76:101815 [PMID: 32062302]
  6. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Jul;42(4):429-38 [PMID: 25134949]
  7. Community Ment Health J. 2018 Aug;54(6):793-804 [PMID: 29188393]
  8. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858 [PMID: 30496104]
  9. Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;214(3):130-132 [PMID: 30774058]
  10. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):576-584 [PMID: 27624838]
  11. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;2(6):503-14 [PMID: 26360446]
  12. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):91-102 [PMID: 27709376]
  13. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113241 [PMID: 32590231]
  14. World Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;11(2):123-8 [PMID: 22654945]
  15. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:295-298 [PMID: 28865718]
  16. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Sep;69(9):512-22 [PMID: 25801941]
  17. Community Ment Health J. 2020 Apr;56(3):568-580 [PMID: 31807994]
  18. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):174 [PMID: 31182058]
  19. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20 [PMID: 24497237]
  20. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Dec;52(12):1621-6 [PMID: 11726753]
  21. JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Oct 4;6(10):e14233 [PMID: 31588912]
  22. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52 [PMID: 22130746]
  23. Community Ment Health J. 2015 Jan;51(1):1-13 [PMID: 25344345]
  24. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Sep;67(6):405-11 [PMID: 23941159]
  25. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 May 11;11:36 [PMID: 28503194]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0barriersmentalrecoverypersonalanalysiswithinrootshealthculturalnarrativesystem-levelfacilitatorssocialco-productiveillnessgroupusersthreeprofessionalsresearchyieldedsystemscontextpossibleaddressservicesadvocacyRootsSocialqualitativeBACKGROUND:synthesisundertakenAIMS:clarifypeopleMETHOD:QualitativestudyguidedthematicDatacollectedonefocusinvolvedsevenservice11meetingslasting2hlocalinstituteJuly2016January2018RESULTS:themes:inhibitingpositiveinteractionrelationshipnetworkssolutionsBarriersacknowledgedrelatedsensesafetylocuscontroloneselfreunionselfrecognisedincludingsystemwithouttraumasensitivitylacksupportlimitedaccesspsychosocialapproachesalsofoundnarrativesrelatingsolutionchangecalledmakespersonalisedgoalsvaluedinclusivedesignovercomesstigmaachieveopenacceptingcommunityCONCLUSIONS:specificprocessneedtransformationfacilitateidentifiedinterventionsexploredtranslatesuggestedchangesactionSystem-levelhealth:dialoguesConsumerco-productionmedicine

Similar Articles

Cited By