Opioid use, regulation, and harms in Brazil: a comprehensive narrative overview of available data and indicators.

Lucas O Maia, Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno, Benedikt Fischer
Author Information
  1. Lucas O Maia: Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, SFU Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 515 W. Hastings Street, V6B 5K3, Vancouver, BC, Canada. ORCID
  2. Dimitri Daldegan-Bueno: Schools of Population Health and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, 1023, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand. ORCID
  3. Benedikt Fischer: Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, SFU Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 515 W. Hastings Street, V6B 5K3, Vancouver, BC, Canada. bfischer@sfu.ca. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global opioid consumption increased multifold post-2000, disproportionately in high-income countries, with severe mortality/morbidity consequences. Latin America features comparatively low opioid availability; Brazil, the region's most populous country, makes an interesting case study concerning opioid use/harms. In this comprehensive overview, we aimed to identify and summarize medical and non-medical data and indicators of opioid availability and use, regulation/control, and harm outcomes in Brazil since 2000.
METHODS: We searched multiple scientific databases to identify relevant publications and conducted additional 'grey' literature searches to identify other pertinent information.
RESULTS: Despite some essential indicators, opioid-related data are limited for Brazil. Data indicate that population-level availability of prescription opioids represents only a small fraction of use in comparison to high-income countries. However, within Latin America, Brazil ranks mid-level for opioid consumption, indicating relatively moderate consumption compared to neighboring jurisdictions. Brazil has implemented restrictive regulations to opioid prescribing and is considered 'highly restricted' for opioid access. Codeine remains the major opioid analgesic utilized, but stronger opioids such as oxycodone are becoming more common. Professional knowledge regarding medical opioid use and effects appears limited. National surveys indicate increases in non-medical use of prescription opioids, albeit lower than observed in North America, while illicit opioids (e.g., heroin) are highly uncommon.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall population-level opioid availability and corresponding levels of opioid-related harms in Brazil remain substantially lower than rates reported for North America. However, the available surveillance and analytical data on opioid use, policy/practice, and harms in Brazil are limited and insufficient. Since existing and acute (e.g., pain-related) needs for improved opioid utilization and practice appear to be substantiated, improved indicators for and understanding of opioid use, practice, and harms in Brazil are required.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Aug;46:107-111 [PMID: 28735776]
  2. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 May-Jun;62(3):356-64 [PMID: 22656681]
  3. Glob Public Health. 2020 Feb;15(2):299-306 [PMID: 31190616]
  4. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Feb 17;15(1):14 [PMID: 32066470]
  5. Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:109-113 [PMID: 29126920]
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 07;66(26):697-704 [PMID: 28683056]
  7. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):662-9 [PMID: 25296151]
  8. Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Dec;41 Suppl 2:47-56 [PMID: 18094786]
  9. Pain Rep. 2019 May 21;4(3):e730 [PMID: 31583347]
  10. Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):219-228 [PMID: 29871366]
  11. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):677 [PMID: 32698815]
  12. PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e62270 [PMID: 23690934]
  13. J Pain Res. 2019 Jan 07;12:243-253 [PMID: 30662280]
  14. Braz J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;34(3):294-305 [PMID: 23429775]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):15078-83 [PMID: 26575631]
  16. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Jun;38(6):248-251 [PMID: 29911821]
  17. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102616 [PMID: 31855706]
  18. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0135059 [PMID: 26252517]
  19. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2005 May-Jun;51(3):139-43 [PMID: 16007298]
  20. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 May 09;13:928 [PMID: 31281425]
  21. Addiction. 2014 Feb;109(2):177-81 [PMID: 23692335]
  22. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:559-74 [PMID: 25581144]
  23. Addiction. 2018 Oct;113(10):1905-1926 [PMID: 29749059]
  24. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):143 [PMID: 32005211]
  25. Lancet. 2017 Jul 29;390(10093):437-439 [PMID: 28792397]
  26. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207921 [PMID: 30475871]
  27. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi41-50 [PMID: 24285228]
  28. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jan 24;1(1):32-38 [PMID: 36101564]
  29. Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Nov 13;51(suppl 2):18s [PMID: 29160464]
  30. Pain Manag. 2018 May;8(3):181-196 [PMID: 29774774]
  31. Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Mar;30(3):522-32 [PMID: 24714942]
  32. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Aug;44(2):239-51 [PMID: 22871508]
  33. Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1391-1454 [PMID: 29032993]
  34. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Aug 15;33:e076 [PMID: 31432927]
  35. Addict Behav. 2005 Mar;30(3):545-56 [PMID: 15718070]
  36. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 20;69(11):290-297 [PMID: 32191688]
  37. Pain Med. 2014 May;15(5):807-19 [PMID: 24401078]
  38. Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Jun;42 Suppl 1:109-17 [PMID: 18660930]
  39. Pain Manag. 2016;6(3):249-63 [PMID: 26988312]
  40. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov - Dec;69(6):529-536 [PMID: 31703816]
  41. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi7-13 [PMID: 24436961]
  42. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214329 [PMID: 30897156]
  43. Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Dec;50(suppl 2):13s [PMID: 27982373]
  44. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:183-188 [PMID: 30718120]
  45. Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Feb;25(2):761-772 [PMID: 32022215]
  46. Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S78-81 [PMID: 21839904]
  47. JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1468-78 [PMID: 26461997]
  48. Addiction. 2019 May;114(5):774-780 [PMID: 30512204]
  49. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21 Suppl:100-8 [PMID: 16463001]
  50. Braz J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;32(3):231-41 [PMID: 19918673]
  51. JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1065-1067 [PMID: 28975295]
  52. Pain. 2008 Oct 31;139(3):498-506 [PMID: 18672325]
  53. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Feb;39(1):4-6 [PMID: 24383938]
  54. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;29(3):157-65 [PMID: 24172159]
  55. J Public Health Dent. 2017 Sep;77(4):285-289 [PMID: 28670678]
  56. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jul;28(7):1221-9 [PMID: 22697274]
  57. Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1644-56 [PMID: 26852264]
  58. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):367-375 [PMID: 30167651]
  59. Lancet. 2019 Oct 26;394(10208):1560-1579 [PMID: 31657732]
  60. Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:112-118 [PMID: 30217407]
  61. NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Jan;(356):1-8 [PMID: 32487285]
  62. Am J Public Health. 2018 May;108(5):666-668 [PMID: 29565665]

Grants

  1. #SAF-94814/Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA)

MeSH Term

Analgesics, Opioid
Brazil
Humans
Opioid-Related Disorders
Pain
Practice Patterns, Physicians'

Chemicals

Analgesics, Opioid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0opioidBraziluseAmericaavailabilitydataindicatorsopioidsharmsconsumptionLatinidentifylimitedhigh-incomecountriescomprehensiveoverviewmedicalnon-medicalopioid-relatedindicatepopulation-levelprescriptionHoweverlowerNorthegavailableimprovedpracticeBACKGROUND:Globalincreasedmultifoldpost-2000disproportionatelyseveremortality/morbidityconsequencesfeaturescomparativelylowregion'spopulouscountrymakesinterestingcasestudyconcerninguse/harmsaimedsummarizeregulation/controlharmoutcomessince2000METHODS:searchedmultiplescientificdatabasesrelevantpublicationsconductedadditional'grey'literaturesearchespertinentinformationRESULTS:DespiteessentialDatarepresentssmallfractioncomparisonwithinranksmid-levelindicatingrelativelymoderatecomparedneighboringjurisdictionsimplementedrestrictiveregulationsprescribingconsidered'highlyrestricted'accessCodeineremainsmajoranalgesicutilizedstrongeroxycodonebecomingcommonProfessionalknowledgeregardingeffectsappearsNationalsurveysincreasesalbeitobservedillicitheroinhighlyuncommonCONCLUSIONS:Overallcorrespondinglevelsremainsubstantiallyratesreportedsurveillanceanalyticalpolicy/practiceinsufficientSinceexistingacutepain-relatedneedsutilizationappearsubstantiatedunderstandingrequiredOpioidregulationBrazil:narrativeHarmsNon‐medicalOpioidsPainPolicyPublichealthRegulation

Similar Articles

Cited By