Lymph Node Staging with a Combined Protocol of F-FDG PET/MRI and Sentinel Node SPECT/CT: A Prospective Study in Patients with FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma.

Matthias Weissinger, Florin-Andrei Taran, Sergios Gatidis, Stefan Kommoss, Konstantin Nikolaou, Samine Sahbai, Christian la Foug��re, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Helmut Dittmann
Author Information
  1. Matthias Weissinger: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  2. Florin-Andrei Taran: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  3. Sergios Gatidis: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  4. Stefan Kommoss: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  5. Konstantin Nikolaou: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  6. Samine Sahbai: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  7. Christian la Foug��re: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; christian.lafougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
  8. Sara Yvonne Brucker: Department of Women's Health, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; christian.lafougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
  9. Helmut Dittmann: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; christian.lafougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is present in a minority of patients with early stages of cervical carcinomas. As conventional imaging including PET/CT has shown limited sensitivity, systematic lymphadenectomies are often conducted for staging purposes. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to analyze the impact of F-FDG PET/MRI in addition to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy on lymph node (LN) status. Forty-two women with an initial diagnosis of F��d��ration Internationale de Gyn��cologie et d'Obst��trique (FIGO) IA-IIB cervical carcinoma were included between March 2016 and April 2019. Each patient underwent preoperative whole-body F-FDG PET/MRI and SLN imaging with SPECT/CT after intracervical injection of Tc-labeled nanocolloid. Systematic lymphadenectomy and SLN biopsy served as the reference standard. Staging using PET/MRI was performed by nuclear medicine and radiology experts working in consensus. One patient was excluded from surgical staging because of liver metastases newly diagnosed on PET/MRI. The overall prevalence of LNM in the remaining 41 patients was 29.3% (12/41). Five of 12 patients with LNM had solely small metastases with a maximum diameter of 5 mm. The consensus interpretation showed PET/MRI to have a specificity of 100% (29/29; 95% CI, 88.3%-100%) for LNM staging but a low sensitivity, 33.3% (4/12; 95% CI, 12.8%-60.9%). LN size was the most important factor for the detectability of metastases, since only LNMs larger than 5 mm could be identified by PET/MRI (sensitivity, 57.1% for >5 mm and 0% for ���5 mm). Paraaortic LNM was evaluated accurately in 3 of the 4 patients with paraaortic LN metastasis. SLNs were detectable by SPECT/CT in 82.9% of the patients or 69.0% of the hemipelves. In cases with an undetectable SLN on SPECT/CT, the malignancy rate was considerably higher (31.2% vs. 19.3%). The combination of PET/MRI and SLN SPECT/CT improved the detection of pelvic LNM from 33.3% to 75%. F-FDG PET/MRI is a highly specific N-staging method and improves LNM detection. Because of the limited sensitivity in frequently occurring small LNMs, PET/MRI should be combined with SLN mapping. The proposed combined protocol helps to decide whether extensive surgical staging is necessary in patients with FIGO I/II cervical cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Aug;45(12):2103-9 [PMID: 19403303]
  2. Gynecol Oncol. 1980 Feb;9(1):90-8 [PMID: 7353805]
  3. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984;23(6):455-9 [PMID: 6099039]
  4. CMAJ. 2008 Mar 25;178(7):855-62 [PMID: 18362381]
  5. Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):537-45 [PMID: 27033474]
  6. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jan;45(1):67-76 [PMID: 28840302]
  7. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000 Jul;10(4):305-312 [PMID: 11240691]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):353-7 [PMID: 21215440]
  9. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Apr;93(1):107-11 [PMID: 15047221]
  10. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb;15(1):52-8 [PMID: 20087618]
  11. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):64-84 [PMID: 30659131]
  12. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):559-67 [PMID: 26416173]
  13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):413-22 [PMID: 22911367]
  14. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr;113:153-157 [PMID: 30927941]
  15. J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(10):1642-1649 [PMID: 27230933]
  16. Gynecol Oncol. 1989 Apr;33(1):34-9 [PMID: 2703164]
  17. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):1-20 [PMID: 25454828]
  18. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jun;41(6):1103-12 [PMID: 24562642]
  19. Cancer Sci. 2010 Jun;101(6):1471-9 [PMID: 20298252]
  20. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):93-99 [PMID: 31839343]
  21. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(12):1814-24 [PMID: 26199113]
  22. Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2338-45 [PMID: 12802611]
  23. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1204-10 [PMID: 15172853]
  24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):540-5 [PMID: 24407177]
  25. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jun;97(3):727-32 [PMID: 15943983]
  26. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv72-iv83 [PMID: 28881916]
  27. Eur Radiol. 2010 Aug;20(8):1803-11 [PMID: 20182732]
  28. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):46-50 [PMID: 19646741]
  29. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;33(2):216-21 [PMID: 17097845]
  30. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):128-35 [PMID: 18581404]
  31. Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):2005-18 [PMID: 23455762]
  32. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):604-13 [PMID: 17628644]
  33. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135 [PMID: 30656645]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Prospective Studies
Middle Aged
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neoplasm Staging
Adult
Aged
Sentinel Lymph Node
Lymphatic Metastasis
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Chemicals

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PET/MRILNMpatientsSLNSPECT/CTnodecervicalsensitivitystagingF-FDG3%mmLNFIGOmetastasescombinedLymphmetastasisimaginglimitedsentinellymphbiopsycarcinomapatientStagingconsensussurgical12small595%CI339%LNMs0%detectionprotocolI/IINodepresentminorityearlystagescarcinomasconventionalincludingPET/CTshownsystematiclymphadenectomiesoftenconductedpurposesThereforeaimprospectivestudyanalyzeimpactadditionstatusForty-twowomeninitialdiagnosisF��d��rationInternationaledeGyn��cologieetd'Obst��triqueIA-IIBincludedMarch2016April2019underwentpreoperativewhole-bodyintracervicalinjectionTc-labelednanocolloidSystematiclymphadenectomyservedreferencestandardusingperformednuclearmedicineradiologyexpertsworkingOneexcludedlivernewlydiagnosedoverallprevalenceremaining412912/41Fivesolelymaximumdiameterinterpretationshowedspecificity100%29/29883%-100%low4/128%-60sizeimportantfactordetectabilitysincelargeridentified571%>5���5Paraaorticevaluatedaccurately34paraaorticSLNsdetectable8269hemipelvescasesundetectablemalignancyrateconsiderablyhigher312%vs19combinationimprovedpelvic75%highlyspecificN-stagingmethodimprovesfrequentlyoccurringmappingproposedhelpsdecidewhetherextensivenecessarycancerCombinedProtocolSentinelSPECT/CT:ProspectiveStudyPatientsCervicalCarcinoma18F-FDG99mTc-nanocolloid

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)