The prevalence, reasons and attitudes for the practice of informal medicine.

Menashe Meni Amran, Avital Bilitzky Kopit, Hannan Ariel Kranc, Roni Peleg
Author Information
  1. Menashe Meni Amran: Maccabi Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel. Amran_m@mac.org.il.
  2. Avital Bilitzky Kopit: Maccabi Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  3. Hannan Ariel Kranc: Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
  4. Roni Peleg: Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informal medicine, entailing undocumented medical advice, has been described in diverse medical disciplines and geographical regions. We assessed the current prevalence and characteristics of informal medical consulting, the reasons physicians provide it, and their attitudes toward it.
METHODS: We conducted a survey among family physicians in Israel, a country with a national health insurance system. A questionnaire was emailed to all primary care physicians in the two largest HMOs in southern Israel. Fifteen questions addressed the prevalence, practice and attitudes to informal medical consulting. Ten questions assessed demographics and professional experience.
RESULTS: Of 143 respondents (mean age 41���years), 55% were women. Ninety-five percent of the respondents reported requesting informal medical consulting from other physicians. Fifty-four percent reported often providing informal consulting to family and friends; and an additional 27% reported doing so under exceptional circumstances. The main reasons given for informal consulting requests were availability and accessibility (81% of respondents), and not financial savings. Only 17.5% stated being in favor of informal consulting for family and friends. Only 11% expressed feeling satisfaction after providing such consultation; 49% expressed discomfort. Sixty-six percent thought a position paper on informal consulting to family and friends is needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our survey of primary care physicians shows very frequent informal medical consulting, despite high dissatisfaction with such, and an interest in receiving guidelines on this practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Jul;7(3):285-308 [PMID: 21554778]
  2. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2017 May-Jun;8(3):211-214 [PMID: 28584762]
  3. Obstet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):155-156 [PMID: 29225672]
  4. JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1253-5 [PMID: 9786376]
  5. Aust Prescr. 2016 Feb;39(1):11-3 [PMID: 27041799]
  6. Virtual Mentor. 2012 May 01;14(5):396-7 [PMID: 23351205]
  7. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):153-6 [PMID: 1586551]
  8. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;170(2_Suppl):S1-S32 [PMID: 30641552]
  9. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jan;16(1):45-51 [PMID: 29311174]
  10. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jul 21;6(2):e11 [PMID: 28733273]
  11. HEC Forum. 2012 Jun;24(2):127-37 [PMID: 22262264]
  12. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e031353 [PMID: 31542761]
  13. Isr Med Assoc J. 1999 Dec;1(4):241-4 [PMID: 10731352]
  14. BMC Med. 2005 Oct 21;3:16 [PMID: 16242034]
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 5;16(1):549 [PMID: 27716256]
  16. Acad Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;39(1):22-30 [PMID: 24923781]
  17. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):87 [PMID: 31862016]
  18. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 20;14:353-361 [PMID: 32110001]
  19. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 May;10(5):261-5 [PMID: 7616335]

MeSH Term

Attitude
Female
Humans
Medicine
Physicians, Family
Prevalence
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informalconsultingmedicalphysiciansmedicinefamilyInformalprevalencereasonsattitudescarepracticerespondentspercentreportedfriendsassessedsurveyIsraelprimaryquestionsprovidingexpressedBACKGROUND:entailingundocumentedadvicedescribeddiversedisciplinesgeographicalregionscurrentcharacteristicsprovidetowarditMETHODS:conductedamongcountrynationalhealthinsurancesystemquestionnaireemailedtwolargestHMOssouthernFifteenaddressedTendemographicsprofessionalexperienceRESULTS:143meanage41���years55%womenNinety-fiverequestingFifty-fouroftenadditional27%exceptionalcircumstancesmaingivenrequestsavailabilityaccessibility81%financialsavings175%statedfavor11%feelingsatisfactionconsultation49%discomfortSixty-sixthoughtpositionpaperneededCONCLUSIONS:showsfrequentdespitehighdissatisfactioninterestreceivingguidelinesFamilyPrimary

Similar Articles

Cited By