Revisited: Pigeons Have Much Cognitive Behavior in Common With Humans.

Thomas R Zentall
Author Information
  1. Thomas R Zentall: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Abstract

The hypothesis proposed by Macphail (1987) is that differences in intelligent behavior thought to distinguish different species were likely attributed to differences in the of the tasks being used. Once one corrects for differences in sensory input, motor output, and incentive, it is likely that all vertebrate animals have comparable intellectual abilities. In the present article I suggest a number of tests of this hypothesis with pigeons. In each case, the evidence suggests that either there is evidence for the cognitive behavior, or the pigeons suffer from biases similar to those of humans. Thus, Macphail's hypothesis offers a challenge to researchers to find the appropriate conditions to bring out in the animal the cognitive ability being tested.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Mar;7(1):100-6 [PMID: 10780022]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jan;83(1):1-13 [PMID: 15762377]
  3. J Comp Psychol. 2001 Mar;115(1):62-7 [PMID: 11334220]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Jul;11(3):453-69 [PMID: 4009126]
  5. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Jan;28(1):111-5 [PMID: 11868229]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1949 Jan;56(1):51-65 [PMID: 18124807]
  7. Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):337-42 [PMID: 16396080]
  8. Behav Processes. 2004 Nov 30;67(3):405-15 [PMID: 15518990]
  9. Science. 1974 Aug 30;185(4153):796-8 [PMID: 4843380]
  10. Behav Processes. 2004 Nov 30;67(3):395-403 [PMID: 15518989]
  11. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Nov;73(2):202-7 [PMID: 5493260]
  12. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):320-34 [PMID: 6886634]
  13. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):335-9 [PMID: 16082815]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2019 Jan;22(1):81-87 [PMID: 30430348]
  15. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Jul;6(3):278-99 [PMID: 7391753]
  16. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):113-7 [PMID: 15116995]
  17. Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):185-90 [PMID: 18325692]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):22-37 [PMID: 24893106]
  19. J Comp Psychol. 1996 Sep;110(3):316-20 [PMID: 8858851]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34 [PMID: 2324664]
  21. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-21 [PMID: 24893105]
  22. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):237-41 [PMID: 17695350]
  23. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20 [PMID: 26881902]
  24. Learn Behav. 2007 Nov;35(4):242-51 [PMID: 18047222]
  25. Learn Behav. 2008 Feb;36(1):55-61 [PMID: 18318426]
  26. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):673-7 [PMID: 18567273]
  27. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1203-8 [PMID: 20943686]
  28. Behav Processes. 2017 May;138:67-72 [PMID: 28216121]
  29. Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:320-326 [PMID: 30077654]
  30. J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):1-9 [PMID: 21574688]
  31. Science. 1976 Jan 30;191(4225):408-9 [PMID: 17782921]
  32. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):412-6 [PMID: 20551367]
  33. Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193-216 [PMID: 15440996]
  34. Learn Behav. 2010 May;38(2):169-76 [PMID: 20400736]
  35. Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1185-1189 [PMID: 29750594]
  36. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(3):247-54 [PMID: 26167775]
  37. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):889-95 [PMID: 15732699]