Tips for Conducting Telesimulation-Based Medical Education.

Anita Thomas, Rebekah Burns, Elizabeth Sanseau, Marc Auerbach
Author Information
  1. Anita Thomas: Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital - Univeristy of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
  2. Rebekah Burns: Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital - University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
  3. Elizabeth Sanseau: General Pediatrics: Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
  4. Marc Auerbach: Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.

Abstract

Telesimulation utilizes communications technology, such as video conferencing platforms, to provide simulation-based medical education when participants and facilitators are geographically separated. Learners interact with each other, embedded participants, and a simulated patient and/or vital sign display on the computer screen. Facilitators observe the learners in real-time and provide immediate feedback during a remote debrief. Telesimulation obviates the need to have instructors, learners, and high fidelity patient simulators (HPS) in the same place, allowing simulation-based educational sessions to occur in institutions located remotely from simulation centers or when other barriers limit in-person education and/or training. For example, due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many medical education programs temporarily discontinued in-person simulations to adhere to physical distancing guidelines. The authors have reflected upon their experiences executing telesimulation sessions since the start of the pandemic and provide these 12 tips as practical suggestions on how to successfully implement telesimulations with medical trainees. These tips are intended to guide implementation and facilitation by staff and faculty trained in simulation.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88 [PMID: 21900138]
  2. AEM Educ Train. 2017 Feb 17;1(2):132-136 [PMID: 30051023]
  3. Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49 [PMID: 25188485]
  4. Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28 [PMID: 16147767]
  5. Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17 [PMID: 27254527]
  6. Simul Healthc. 2012 Feb;7(1):35-9 [PMID: 22228281]
  7. J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul - Aug;77(4):729-732 [PMID: 32253133]
  8. ATS Sch. 2020 Jun 3;1(2):87-100 [PMID: 33870273]
  9. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611 [PMID: 32503818]
  10. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Aug;76(4):330-43 [PMID: 19642147]
  11. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):1078-89 [PMID: 23595919]
  12. Cureus. 2020 Mar 31;12(3):e7492 [PMID: 32368424]
  13. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):144-147 [PMID: 28846175]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR001863/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0simulationmedicaleducationprovideTelesimulationsimulation-basedparticipantspatientand/orlearnersremotesessionsin-personpandemictipsutilizescommunicationstechnologyvideoconferencingplatformsfacilitatorsgeographicallyseparatedLearnersinteractembeddedsimulatedvitalsigndisplaycomputerscreenFacilitatorsobservereal-timeimmediatefeedbackdebriefobviatesneedinstructorshighfidelitysimulatorsHPSplaceallowingeducationaloccurinstitutionslocatedremotelycentersbarrierslimittrainingexampleduenovelcoronavirusCOVID-19manyprogramstemporarilydiscontinuedsimulationsadherephysicaldistancingguidelinesauthorsreflecteduponexperiencesexecuting telesimulationsincestart12practicalsuggestionssuccessfullyimplementtelesimulationstraineesintendedguideimplementationfacilitationstafffacultytrainedTipsConductingTelesimulation-BasedMedicalEducationdistancehealthcarelearningtelesimulation

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)