Randomization-based inference in the presence of selection bias.

Diane Uschner
Author Information
  1. Diane Uschner: The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland, USA. ORCID

Abstract

For the analysis of clinical trials, the study participants are usually assumed to be representative sample of a target population. This assumption is rarely fulfilled in clinical trials, and particularly not if the sample size is small. In addition, covariate imbalances may affect the trial. Randomization tests provide a nonparametric analysis method of the treatment effect that does not rely on population-based assumptions. We propose a nonparametric statistical model that yields a formal basis for randomization tests. We adapt the model for the presence of covariate imbalance in the form of selection bias and investigate the effects of bias on the rejection probability of the randomization test using Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, we show that ancillary statistics can be used to control for the influence of bias. We show that covariate imbalance leads to an inflation of the type I error probability. The proposed nonparametric model allows for the use of ancillary statistics that yield an unbiased adjusted randomization test.

Keywords

References

  1. Armitage P. Fisher, Bradford Hill, and randomization. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:925-928.
  2. Blackwell D, Hodges J. Design for the control of selection bias. Ann Math Stat. 1957;25:449-460.
  3. Berger VW. Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials. Biom J. 2005;47:119-127.
  4. Proschan M. Influence of selection bias on type 1 error rate under random permuted block designs. Stat Sin. 1994;4:219-231.
  5. Uschner D, Hilgers R-D, Heussen N. The impact of selection bias in randomized multi-arm parallel group clinical trials. PLoS One. 2018;13:1-18.
  6. Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in Clinical Trials - Theory and Practice. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2016.
  7. Rosenberger WF, Uschner D, Wang Y. Randomization: the forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial. Stat Med. 2019;38:1-12.
  8. Kempthorne O. The randomization theory of experimental inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:946-967.
  9. Edgington E. Randomization Tests. Statistics: A Series of Textbooks and Monographs. 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 1995.
  10. Pitman EJG. Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Suppl J R Stat Soc. 1937;4:119-130.
  11. Cox DR. A remark on randomization in clinical trials. Utilitas Mathematica. 1982;21A:245-252.
  12. Zhang L, Rosenberger WF. Adaptive randomization in clinical trials. In: Hinkelmann K, ed. Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume. 3: Special Designs and Applications. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011.
  13. Plamadeala V, Rosenberger WF. Sequential monitoring with conditional randomization tests. Ann Stat. 2012;40:30-44.
  14. Zheng L, Zelen M. Multi-center clinical trials: randomization and ancillary statistics. Ann Appl Stat. 2008;2:582-600.
  15. Berger V, Ivanova A, Knoll D. Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures. Stat Med. 2003;22(19):3017-3028.
  16. Salama I, Ivanova A, Qaqish B. Efficient generation of constrained block allocation sequences. Stat Med. 2007;27(9):1421-1428.
  17. Uschner D, Schindler D, Hilgers R-D, Heussen N. randomizeR: an R package for the assessment and implementation of randomization in clinical trials. J Stat Softw. 2018;85:1-22.
  18. Uschner D. infeR: randomization based inference in clinical trials; 2020.
  19. Cox DR, Hinkley DV. Theoretical Statistics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 1974.
  20. Kennes LN, Cramer E, Hilgers RD, Heussen N. The impact of selection bias on test decision in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 2011;30:2573-2581.
  21. Kennes LN, Rosenberger WF, Hilgers R-D. Inference for blocked randomization under a selection bias model. Biometrics. 2015;71:979-984.
  22. Gail MH, Tan WY, Piantadosi S. Tests for no treatment effect in randomized clinical trials. Biometrika. 1988;75:57-64.
  23. Fisher RA. The Design of Experiments. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company; 1971.
  24. Feller W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 2 in Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 1971.

MeSH Term

Bias
Humans
Models, Statistical
Random Allocation
Sample Size
Selection Bias

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0randomizationbiasclinicaltrialscovariatenonparametricmodelancillaryanalysissampletestspresenceimbalanceselectionprobabilitytestshowstatisticscontroltypeerrorstatisticstudyparticipantsusuallyassumedrepresentativetargetpopulationassumptionrarelyfulfilledparticularlysizesmalladditionimbalancesmayaffecttrialRandomizationprovidemethodtreatmenteffectrelypopulation-basedassumptionsproposestatisticalyieldsformalbasisadaptforminvestigateeffectsrejectionusingMonteCarlosimulationsFinallycanusedinfluenceleadsinflationproposedallowsuseyieldunbiasedadjustedRandomization-basedinferencesufficient

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.