A Sustainable Approach to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Meghan C McCullough, Emma Vartanian, James Andersen, Mark Tan
Author Information
  1. Meghan C McCullough: Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
  2. Emma Vartanian: Division of Plastic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
  3. James Andersen: Division of Plastic Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.
  4. Mark Tan: Division of Plastic Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction provides an alternative to submuscular reconstruction, but the increased acellular dermal matrix (ADM) required has the potential to lead to increased costs and decreased supply of this limited-resource material. We present a method for prepectoral reconstruction utilizing skin-graft meshing techniques to increase the surface area of usable ADM.
METHODS: Forty-four patients underwent this technique from February 2019 to February 2020. Patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes, including complications and patient satisfaction utilizing the BREAST-Q, were analyzed. Cost analysis relative to projected cost of nonmeshed techniques was performed.
RESULTS: There were 20 unilateral and 24 bilateral procedures, for a total of 68 breast reconstructions. Mean age was 45.9 years (32-71). Mean implant volume was 485 cm (265-800), and one sheet of ADM was used for each breast with an average surface area of 161 cm. Median follow-up was 350 days (212-576). Minor complications included an infection treated with oral antibiotics. Major complications included one axillary hematoma and one delayed implant loss. One patient underwent revision for asymmetry. Mean BREAST-Q score was 47.4/60. Cost ranged from $4113 to 5025 per breast, compared with the projected $9125-18250 per breast for other techniques in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously described uses of ADM in prepectoral reconstruction, meshing maximizes resource utilization by expanding the coverage of a single sheet. Early findings demonstrate minimal complications and high patient satisfaction, suggesting the approach has potential to provide the benefits of prepectoral reconstruction while responsibly preserving product availability and tempering healthcare costs.

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e574 [PMID: 26893999]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Nov 16;6(11):e2007 [PMID: 30881801]
  3. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Nov;81(5):609-614 [PMID: 30059383]
  4. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):139-143 [PMID: 31335468]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S [PMID: 29166344]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Jul 08;3(6):e412 [PMID: 26180713]
  7. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jun;143(6):1547-1556 [PMID: 31136464]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S [PMID: 29166346]
  9. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2899-2908 [PMID: 29978367]
  10. Gland Surg. 2019 Dec;8(6):748-757 [PMID: 32042683]
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 09;3(11):e569 [PMID: 26893994]
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Nov 23;4(11):e1139 [PMID: 27975034]
  13. Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;46(6):550-557 [PMID: 31775208]
  14. Breast J. 2017 Sep;23(5):545-553 [PMID: 28295975]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):43S-48S [PMID: 29166347]
  16. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 18;153(4):e176233 [PMID: 29490366]
  17. Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Dec;14(6):382-387 [PMID: 31933584]
  18. Microsurgery. 2010;30(2):91-6 [PMID: 19790185]
  19. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Jul;17(4):266-271 [PMID: 28190760]
  20. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37(11):599-604 [PMID: 25339795]
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1077-1084 [PMID: 29697602]
  22. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7 [PMID: 25455288]
  23. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e703-e711 [PMID: 29275104]
  24. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443 [PMID: 28574950]
  25. Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Apr 6;38(5):519-526 [PMID: 29365064]
  26. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;84(6S Suppl 5):S417-S423 [PMID: 32040000]
  27. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):67-74 [PMID: 30842930]
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1311-1319 [PMID: 31033812]
  29. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294 [PMID: 28121858]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 May 27;4(5):e708 [PMID: 27579232]
  31. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 22;4(7):e821 [PMID: 27536500]
  32. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3):263-270 [PMID: 31663934]
  33. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):415-421 [PMID: 26818275]
  34. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 4;6(4):e1712 [PMID: 29876165]
  35. ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):493-498 [PMID: 25266930]
  36. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):31S-38S [PMID: 29166345]
  37. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353 [PMID: 19644246]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0breastreconstructionADMcomplicationsprepectoraltechniquespatientMeanonePrepectoralincreasedpotentialcostsutilizingmeshingsurfaceareaunderwentFebruarysatisfactionBREAST-QCostprojectedimplantsheetincludedperBACKGROUND:implant-basedprovidesalternativesubmuscularacellulardermalmatrixrequiredleaddecreasedsupplylimited-resourcematerialpresentmethodskin-graftincreaseusableMETHODS:Forty-fourpatientstechnique20192020PatientcharacteristicsoperativedetailsoutcomesincludinganalyzedanalysisrelativecostnonmeshedperformedRESULTS:20unilateral24bilateralprocedurestotal68reconstructionsage459years32-71volume485 cm265-800usedaverage161 cmMedianfollow-up350days212-576MinorinfectiontreatedoralantibioticsMajoraxillaryhematomadelayedlossOnerevisionasymmetryscore474/60ranged$41135025compared$9125-18250literatureCONCLUSIONS:contrastpreviouslydescribedusesmaximizesresourceutilizationexpandingcoveragesingleEarlyfindingsdemonstrateminimalhighsuggestingapproachprovidebenefitsresponsiblypreservingproductavailabilitytemperinghealthcareSustainableApproachBreastReconstructionUsingMeshedAcellularDermalMatrix

Similar Articles

Cited By