Impact of rifampicin dose in bone and joint prosthetic device infections due to Staphylococcus spp: a retrospective single-center study in France.

M Tonnelier, A Bouras, C Joseph, Y El Samad, B Brunschweiler, J-L Schmit, C Mabille, J-P Lanoix
Author Information
  1. M Tonnelier: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France. mathilde.tonnelier87@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. A Bouras: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
  3. C Joseph: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
  4. Y El Samad: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
  5. B Brunschweiler: Orthopedic department, CHU Amiens Sud, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France.
  6. J-L Schmit: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
  7. C Mabille: Pharmacy department, CHU Amiens Sud, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France.
  8. J-P Lanoix: Infectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality burden worldwide. While surgical management is well defined, rifampicin (RIF) dose remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine whether Rifampicin dose impact infection outcomes in PJI due to Staphylococcus spp.
METHODS: single-center retrospective study including 411 patients with PJI due to Rifampicin-sensitive Staphylococcus spp. Rifampicine dose was categorized as follow: < 10 mg/kg/day, 10-20 mg/kg/day or > 20 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was patient recovery, defined as being free of infection during 12 months after the end of the initial antibiotic course.
RESULTS: 321 (78%) received RIF for the full antibiotic course. RIF dose didn't affect patients recovery rate with 67, 76 and 69% in the < 10, 10-20 and > 20 mg/kg/day groups, respectively (p = 0.083). In univariate analysis, recovery rate was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.012) but not to RIF dose, or Staphylococcus phenotype (aureus or coagulase-negative). In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.01) and treatment duration (p <  0.01) were significantly associated with recovery rate.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that lower doses of RIF are as efficient and safe as the recommended high-dose French regimen in the treatment of PJI.

Keywords

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):2177-84 [PMID: 24352771]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14(6):1251-3 [PMID: 1623081]
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):1-10 [PMID: 23230301]
  4. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):103-7 [PMID: 20570103]
  5. J Hosp Infect. 2012 Sep;82(1):40-8 [PMID: 22738613]
  6. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213718 [PMID: 30870476]
  7. Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):755-65 [PMID: 18236181]
  8. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Aug;53(4):334-40 [PMID: 21810745]
  9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):746-55 [PMID: 24247130]
  10. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;5 Suppl 3:S440-50 [PMID: 6356277]
  11. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 May;83(5):1039-1047 [PMID: 27813241]
  12. Am J Med. 2006 Nov;119(11):993.e7-10 [PMID: 17071171]
  13. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Feb;39(2):235-40 [PMID: 9069545]
  14. JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1537-41 [PMID: 9605897]
  15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Mar;17(3):439-44 [PMID: 20412187]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54 [PMID: 15483283]
  17. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Oct;11(10):843-5 [PMID: 16153261]
  18. Drugs. 2014 Jun;74(8):839-54 [PMID: 24846578]
  19. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Sep;12(9):930-3 [PMID: 16882303]
  20. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 May;12(5):433-9 [PMID: 16643519]
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jun;37(6):1214-8 [PMID: 8328772]
  22. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Dec;54(6):1158; author reply 1159 [PMID: 15498877]
  23. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Sep;48(3):310-6 [PMID: 27524103]
  24. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;29(8):961-7 [PMID: 20505968]
  25. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Sep;53(9):3880-6 [PMID: 19564363]
  26. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Dec;70(12):3298-306 [PMID: 26342028]
  27. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 May;56(5):622-7 [PMID: 26387492]
  28. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jul;31(7):1422-6 [PMID: 26948176]
  29. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;34(8):1675-82 [PMID: 25987246]
  30. Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Jan;80(1):11-7 [PMID: 23332140]
  31. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Aug;21(4):363-9 [PMID: 17635174]
  32. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jan;50(1):55-61 [PMID: 16377667]
  33. Med Mal Infect. 2009 Oct;39(10):745-74 [PMID: 19877362]
  34. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 Mar;11(2):221-33 [PMID: 22074343]
  35. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Jun;13(6):586-91 [PMID: 17331125]

MeSH Term

Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Arthritis, Infectious
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
France
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Prosthesis-Related Infections
Retrospective Studies
Rifampin
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Rifampin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0doseRIFStaphylococcusPJIrecoveryinfectionsstudydueratejointdefinedrifampicinRifampicininfectionsppsingle-centerretrospectivepatientsantibioticcoursep = 0analysissignificantlyassociated01treatmentBACKGROUND:ProstheticmajorcausemorbiditymortalityburdenworldwidesurgicalmanagementwellremainscontroversialaimdeterminewhetherimpactoutcomesMETHODS:including411Rifampicin-sensitiveRifampicinecategorizedfollow:< 10 mg/kg/day10-20 mg/kg/dayor > 20 mg/kg/dayprimaryendpointpatientfree12 monthsendinitialRESULTS:32178%receivedfullaffect677669%< 1010-20and > 20 mg/kg/daygroupsrespectively083univariategender012phenotypeaureuscoagulase-negativemultivariateagep = 0durationp <  0CONCLUSION:datasuggestlowerdosesefficientsaferecommendedhigh-doseFrenchregimenImpactboneprostheticdevicespp:FranceAdverseeffectsProsthesis-relatedSafety

Similar Articles

Cited By