Trends in Positioning for Robotic Prostatectomy: Results From a Survey of the Endourological Society.

George Wayne, Jeff Wei, Elias Atri, Vivian Wong, Maurilio Garcia-Gil, Jorge Pereira, Alan M Nieder, Akshay Bhandari
Author Information
  1. George Wayne: Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA.
  2. Jeff Wei: Urology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
  3. Elias Atri: Urology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
  4. Vivian Wong: Urology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
  5. Maurilio Garcia-Gil: Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA.
  6. Jorge Pereira: Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA.
  7. Alan M Nieder: Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA.
  8. Akshay Bhandari: Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: most robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALP) are performed with the patient in lithotomy, carrying risks of positioning-related complications. Newer robot models have allowed for supine positioning, potentially avoiding these pitfalls. We gauged the current sentiment on patient positioning among surgeons who perform robot-assisted surgery.
METHODS: we surveyed members of the Endourological Society regarding their practice settings and their opinions on positioning for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Summary statistics were reviewed and data were analyzed using chi-square tests and t-tests.
RESULTS: our survey had 92 eligible respondents. The majority were fellowship-trained, with 51% trained in robotics and 57% practicing in the U.S. with a mean of 13 years of practice. Most were working in an academic setting (69%) and performing at least 25 robotic prostatectomies yearly. 28 respondents used the Intuitive Surgical Inc. da Vinci® Xi™ exclusively (30%), and nearly two-thirds used it sometimes. Although 54% of respondents considered using supine positioning, less than half of these surgeons used it regularly, while 75% overall preferred lithotomy. A majority attributed this choice to surgical team familiarity with lithotomy positioning. Surgeons in the U.S. and those using the da Vinci® Xi™ were more likely to consider supine positioning.
CONCLUSIONS: lithotomy position is the standard for RALP procedures; nonetheless, it poses significant risks that might be avoided with supine positioning. Our survey suggests that, although supine positioning has been considered, it has not gained momentum in practice. Addressing factors of inertia in training practices and one's surgical team might allow for novel and safer approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):775-80 [PMID: 22818134]
  2. J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):360-3 [PMID: 10893585]
  3. Anesthesiology. 1994 Jul;81(1):6-12 [PMID: 8042811]
  4. Urology. 1994 May;43(5):746-7 [PMID: 8165780]
  5. Urology. 2002 Oct;60(4):569-72 [PMID: 12385908]
  6. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1300-3 [PMID: 24060229]
  7. JSLS. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):200-2 [PMID: 21902975]
  8. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(3-4):123-5 [PMID: 22229065]
  9. World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):239-246 [PMID: 30982099]
  10. J Robot Surg. 2015 Sep;9(3):243-7 [PMID: 26531205]
  11. J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):247-9 [PMID: 27638281]
  12. J Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;96(7):619-23 [PMID: 17786971]
  13. J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):660-7 [PMID: 24428586]
  14. Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):837-845 [PMID: 26874806]
  15. J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1269-1276 [PMID: 28967280]
  16. Can Med Assoc J. 1956 Feb 15;74(4):285-8 [PMID: 13293598]
  17. Surg Innov. 2011 Dec;18(4):379-86 [PMID: 21742665]
  18. Reg Anesth. 1992 Sep-Oct;17(5):306-8 [PMID: 1329929]
  19. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):938-42 [PMID: 11020742]
  20. Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):178-84 [PMID: 24659914]
  21. Can J Urol. 2013 Oct;20(5):6957-61 [PMID: 24128839]
  22. J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2087-92 [PMID: 22498227]
  23. JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1198-203 [PMID: 20841533]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0positioninglithotomysupinerobot-assistedpracticeusingrespondentsusedlaparoscopicprostatectomiesRALPpatientriskssurgeonsEndourologicalSocietysurveymajorityroboticsUSdaVinci®Xi™consideredsurgicalteammightPURPOSE:performedcarryingpositioning-relatedcomplicationsNewerrobotmodelsallowedpotentiallyavoidingpitfallsgaugedcurrentsentimentamongperformsurgeryMETHODS:surveyedmembersregardingsettingsopinionsprostatectomySummarystatisticsrevieweddataanalyzedchi-squaretestst-testsRESULTS:92eligiblefellowship-trained51%trained57%practicingmean13yearsworkingacademicsetting69%performingleast25roboticyearly28IntuitiveSurgicalIncexclusively30%nearlytwo-thirdssometimesAlthough54%lesshalfregularly75%overallpreferredattributedchoicefamiliaritySurgeonslikelyconsiderCONCLUSIONS:positionstandardproceduresnonethelessposessignificantavoidedsuggestsalthoughgainedmomentumAddressingfactorsinertiatrainingpracticesone'sallownovelsaferapproachesTrendsPositioningRoboticProstatectomy:ResultsSurveylaparoscopyprostatecancer

Similar Articles

Cited By