Greater Focus on Strengths is Associated with Successful Discharge in Youth Public Mental Health Treatment.

Emilee H Turner, Charles W Mueller
Author Information
  1. Emilee H Turner: Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 2530 Dole Street, Sakamaki C400, Honolulu, Hawai‛i, 96822, USA. eturner@hawaii.edu. ORCID
  2. Charles W Mueller: Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 2530 Dole Street, Sakamaki C400, Honolulu, Hawai‛i, 96822, USA.

Abstract

The positive psychology literature suggests focusing on strengths in mental health treatment improves well-being, reduces symptomology, and is linked to positive outcomes. However, there is little research on the use of strengths in treatment and their association with outcomes in youth clinical populations. The present study used multi-level modeling to examine the association between the proportional targeting of strengths and treatment outcomes for 1,841 youth ages 3-19 receiving intensive in-home services through a public mental health system. A greater percentage of targets endorsed during treatment that were strength-focused was associated with increased likelihood of successful treatment discharge, even after accounting for other predictors, including episode length, youth age, and level of impairment at treatment start. Specifically, as the percentage of strengths targeted increased from 46 to 64% of total targets endorsed, the odds of successful discharge increased by 21%. Such practice-based findings derived from aggregated data regarding services to multiethnic low-income families extend the strength-based intervention literature to include youth with significant life challenges. Study findings point to the need to develop structured interventions suitable for examination via clinical efficacy and effectiveness trials. Clinical practice, dissemination, implementation, and future research implications are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Accomazzo, S., Shapiro, V. B., Israel, N., & Kim, B. K. (2017). The strengths of youth in a public behavioral health system: Measurement choices, prevalence rates, and group differences. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 44(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9547-2 . [DOI: 10.1007/s11414-016-9547-2]
  2. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 . [DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119]
  3. Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2004). The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00058-8 . [DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00058-8]
  4. Center for Mental Health Services (2007). Promotion and prevention in mental health: Strengthening parenting and enhancing child resilience. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/Strengthening-Parenting-Enhancing-Child-Resilience/SVP07-0186
  5. Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers-Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2018). The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2 . [DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2]
  6. Cheavens, J. S., Strunk, D. R., Lazarus, S. A., & Goldstein, L. A. (2012). The compensation and capitalization models: A test of two approaches to individualizing the treatment of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(11), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.002 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.002]
  7. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division, Hawaiʻi Department of Health (2008). Service provider monthly treatment and progress summary. https://health.hawaii.gov/camhd/files/2017/11/MTPS-form.pdf
  8. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division, Hawai’i Department of Health (2012). Instructions and codebook for provider monthly summaries. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Health Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division. https://health.hawaii.gov/camhd/files/2017/11/MTPS-codebook.pdf
  9. Chorpita, B. F., & Donkervoet, C. M. (2005). Implementation of the Felix Consent Decree in Hawaii: The impact of policy and practice development efforts on service delivery. In R. G. Steele & M. C. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of mental health services for children, adolescents, and families (pp. 317–332). New York, NY: Kluwer. [DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23864-6_21]
  10. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 . [DOI: 10.1177/001316446002000104]
  11. Cowen, E. L., & Kilmer, R. P. (2002). “Positive psychology”: Some plusses and some open issues. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10014 . [DOI: 10.1002/jcop.10014]
  12. Cox, K. F. (2006). Investigating the impact of strength-based assessment on youth with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9021-5 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10826-006-9021-5]
  13. Daleiden, E. L., Lee, J., & Tolman, R. (2004). Annual Report. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Health, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division. https://health.hawaii.gov/camhd/annual-reports/
  14. Donaldson, S. I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M. A. (2014). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.943801 . [DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2014.943801]
  15. Duckworth, A., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144154 . [DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144154]
  16. Garland, A. F., Bickman, L., & Chorpita, B. F. (2010). Change what? Identifying quality improvement targets by investigating usual mental health care. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(1–2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0279-y . [DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0279-y]
  17. Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164 . [DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164]
  18. Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2013). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS: Quantitative methodology series (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. [DOI: 10.4324/9780203701249]
  19. Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., de Jong, J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2019). The efficacy of multi-component positive psychology interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 357–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00082-1 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10902-019-00082-1]
  20. Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The child and adolescent functional assessment scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5(4), 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02233865 . [DOI: 10.1007/BF02233865]
  21. Hodges, K. (2005). CAFAS manual for training coordinators, clinical administrators, and data managers (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Kay Hodges.
  22. Jackson, D. S., Hill, K. A., Sender, M., & Mueller (2017). Youth outcome patterns across levels of care in CAMHD services. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division. https://health.hawaii.gov/camhd/files/2017/06/Youth-Outcome-Patterns-in-CAMHD-Services.pdf
  23. Kazdin, A. (2018). Expanding mental health services through novel models of intervention delivery. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12937 . [DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12937]
  24. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Love, A. R., Okado, I., Orimoto, T. E., & Mueller, C. W. (2016). Factor analysis of therapist-identified treatment targets in community-based children’s mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 45(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0770-1 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10488-016-0770-1]
  26. McCammon, S. L. (2012). Systems of care as asset-building communities: Implementing strengths-based planning and positive youth development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3–4), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9514-x . [DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9514-x]
  27. Milette-Winfree, M., & Mueller, . (2018). Treatment-as-usual therapy targets for comorbid youth disproportionately focus on externalizing problems. Psychological Services, 15(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000162 . [DOI: 10.1037/ser0000162]
  28. Nezu, C. M., Nezu, A. M., & Houts, P. S. (1993). Multiple applications of problem-solving principles in clinical practice. In K. T. Kuehlwein & H. Rosen (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. Cognitive therapies in action: Evolving innovative practice (pp. 353–378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  29. Nakamura, B. J., Daleiden, E. L., & Mueller, . (2007). Validity of treatment target progress ratings as indicators of youth improvement. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(5), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9119-9 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10826-006-9119-9]
  30. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Values in action (VIA) inventory of character strengths for youth. Adolescent & Family Health, 4(1), 35–40.
  31. Pires, S. A. (2002). Building systems of care: A primer. Washington, DC: National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health, Georgetown University Child Development Center. https://gucchd.georgetown.edu/products/PRIMER_ChildWelfare.pdf
  32. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths-vs. A lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/2Ffpsyg.2015.00456 . [DOI: 10.3389/2Ffpsyg.2015.00456]
  33. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5]
  34. Rashid, T., Anjum, A., & Lennox, C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy for middle school children. Unpublished manuscript, Toronto District School Board. Results presented in: Rashid, T., & Anjum, A. (2008). Positive psychotherapy for young adults and children. In J.R.Z. Abela & B.L. Hankin (Eds), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press, (pp. 250–287).
  35. Ruini, C., Belaise, C., Brombin, C., Caffo, E., & Fava, G. A. (2006). Well-being therapy in school settings: A pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75, 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095438 . [DOI: 10.1159/000095438]
  36. Sabalauskas, K., Ortolani, M. K., & McCall, M. J. (2014). Moving from pathology to possibility: Integrating strengths-based interventions in child welfare provision. Child Care in Practice, 20(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2013.847053 . [DOI: 10.1080/13575279.2013.847053]
  37. Schuetz, N., Mendenhall, A. N., & Grube, W. (2020). Strengths model for youth case management: Impact on the provider and agency. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00668-2 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10560-020-00668-2]
  38. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20593 . [DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20593]
  39. Staudt, M., Howard, M. O., & Drake, B. (2001). The operationalization, implementation, and effectiveness of the strengths perspective: A review of empirical studies. Journal of Social Service Research, 27(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v27n03_01 . [DOI: 10.1300/J079v27n03_01]
  40. Stroul, B. & Friedman, R. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbance (Rev. Ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health. https://gucchd.georgetown.edu/products/SOCIssueBrief.pdf
  41. Tedeschi, R. G., & Kilmer, R. P. (2005). Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.3.230 . [DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.36.3.230]
  42. Viola, W. E., Mankowski, E. S., & Gray, M. E. (2015). The moderating effect of within-group similarity on change in a strengths-based programme for incarcerated young men. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 95–109. [DOI: 10.1002/casp.2196]
  43. Wiener, S. J., Friedman, F. S., Rahman, S., London, S., Riley, A., Deirmenjian, C., et al. (2020). Enhancing resiliency ofjuvenile justice-involved youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(2), S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.152 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.152]
  44. World Health Organization (2014). Definition of mental health. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Mental Health
Patient Discharge
Psychotherapy
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentstrengthsyouthmentalhealthoutcomesincreasedpositivepsychologyliteratureresearchassociationclinicalservicespercentagetargetsendorsedsuccessfuldischargefindingsStrengthsYouthPublicTreatmentsuggestsfocusingimproveswell-beingreducessymptomologylinked Howeverlittleusepopulationspresentstudyusedmulti-levelmodelingexamineproportionaltargeting1841ages3-19receivingintensivein-homepublicsystemgreaterstrength-focusedassociatedlikelihoodevenaccountingpredictorsincludingepisodelengthagelevelimpairmentstartSpecificallytargeted4664%totalodds21%practice-basedderivedaggregateddataregardingmultiethniclow-incomefamiliesextendstrength-basedinterventionincludesignificantlifechallengesStudypointneeddevelopstructuredinterventionssuitableexaminationviaefficacyeffectivenesstrials ClinicalpracticedisseminationimplementationfutureimplicationsdiscussedGreaterFocusAssociatedSuccessfulDischargeMentalHealthPositivetargetUsualcare

Similar Articles

Cited By